So I am opting in 2026 to try and catch up on some old “must see” films in part inspired by the fact I needed to watch Breathless before I saw Nouvelle Vague (maybe I need one of my favourite directors to make films about the making of old films more often). The plan was to watch at least four “must see” older films a month. I also added to that in January maybe watching one campier cult film in the mix- mainly inspired by a film I saw was expiring soon on SBS on Demand that falls in this group in January. Now things like get chaotic with this plan as we are about to have some major nerd IP releases that might result in rewatches of those things (I suspect I won’t rewatch any Star Wars prior The Madalorian and Gorgu but I already started long haul prep for Avengers: Doomsday - I’m rewatching Agents of SHIELD (not that my hopes of it coming up in Doomsday are likely to be realised) and later in the year there will be many film rewatches coming). Anyhow , here is what I watched in January through April and my thoughts on them…
Breathless (or A bout de Souffle) (1960 France dir Jean-Luc Goddard)
Michael, a small time con man, accidentally shots a cop whilst fleeing from his latest con. He decides to flee the country and returns to Paris to get the funds for this and to convince his American journalism student girlfriend, Patricia, to come with him.
This was an interesting film to watch in 2026 for the first time. Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg are outstanding and so charismatic as Michael and Patricia. The film is beautifully shot and comes together seamlessly which is shocking when you see the backstory of how Goddard shot it (which is chronicled in Nouvelle Vague). I would deeply love someone to make me or point me in direction of where to buy the dress Seberg wears in the final scenes. This sounds like a rave but I will own that when I rated this on Letterboxd, I only gave it a 4.5 as I had to knock 0.5 off for the fact that the presentation of women is a mess and more than a wee bit sexist.
Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars
The Terminator (1984 US, dir James Cameron)
A young woman finds herself the target of a murderous cyborg sent from the dystopian future to kill her. She finds help from a young man who also travelled from the future who tells her that the cyborg is targeting her as her son will take down the robots in the future- the son she is yet to have.
Until this January, this was one of the two films I most often got lectured on not having seen (honestly it is second to the other film as every white man my age appears to be obsessed with the other one, Shawshank- I might get to it this year but TBH also might not just to be petty). The Terminator of the two was the one I felt worse about not having seen as it does seem very much my jam with its cheesy 80s sci fi with a strong female protagonist vibes. I did love it and I will definitely make time for the sequel this year too. Great action, cheesy 80s effects, and quality synth music- yes to all of that. I also was lucky enough that a cinema near me did a screening of the 8mm of it in January so I even got to see it on the big screen. Also knew it was coming as a line in the movie, as like others I’ve heard it quoted even without seeing the film, but I think “come with me if you want to live” might be a better pick up line than any line in any rom com ever.
Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars (testament more to the vibes than the quality of the film)
Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989 Japan, dir Hayao Miyazaki)
When a young witch comes of age, she is required to send a year living independently. Kiki, therefore, leaves her village and goes with her cat to a larger town. She finds a home above a bakery and sets up a delivery business.
People are often surprised that there are Miyazaki films I’ve not seen and well now there are two less- I’m about to get to the second. I really enjoyed this. I thought it was a delightful coming of age story with kinds of questioning of identity that happens in adolescence occurring in the middle part of the film. Kiki as a heroine is one of the earliest of Miyazaki’s super independent young women (since many of his later films are marked by strong women especially one of my fave films of all time, Princess Mononoke) and she isn’t the only strong female character in the film, and it is delightful to see this presentation of a young woman coming in a film from the 1980s written and directed by man. I would definitely say if you have kids in your worlds that you should show them this especially young girls.
Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars
But I’m a Cheerleader… (1999 US dir Jamie Babbit)
Everyone in Megan’s life suspected she might be a lesbian even though she is a popular cheerleader at her school. Her parents and friends send her off to conversion therapy.
This was the film that made me add a more cult film to my mix of films each month. It has an opposite flavour to the only other film I’ve seen about conversion therapy, The Miseducation of Cameron Post (which remains one of the toughest films to watch that I’ve ever seen- really good film but also very tough watch and a much more realistic portrayal of the practice). I’m a huge fan of many people in this film and it has always been one I have considered watched. It is a camp ol’ time which gave a slight echo of John Waters at times. Ru Paul attempting to play straight- hilarious even if he really isn’t a great actor. I will say that as conversion therapy of this type did claim many young lives not 100% sure how I feel about making light of it. On another point, first film I have watched that is directed by a woman- sadly I have so far mainly watched male directed films.
Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars
My Neighbour Totoro (1988 Japan, dir Hayao Miyazaki)
Two young girls move to a rundown house in the country with their father whilst their mother is in hospital ill. Soon they discover the surrounding forrest is full of spirits and in particular they befriend the totoros.
Second Miyazaki and the Miyazaki I’ve most been told off for not having seen in the past. Straight up adorable and the first film I’ve watched in this run that I gave five stars on Letterboxd. The animation is beautiful and there is something just delightfully wholesome about the whole thing. Again as with Kiki this is a great film for kids if you want them to get into anime.
Clare’s ranking- 5 stars
Ten Canoes (2006 Australia, dir Rolf de Heer and Peter Djigirr)
In a world removed from western influence, a narrator tells the story of a group of indigenous men preparing canoes for the hunting season. A young man is in love with one of his brother’s wives and an older men tells him the story of similar young man in the past.
I watched this film on 26 January and it was the perfect day to spend that day with a film that removes western impact from Australia’s indigenous community and instead telling its own indigenous morality tale. This is a beautiful film with the two timelines marked out by the colour palate- the past is in black and white, and the present in colour. It is also great to see a film that is in indigenous dialects- it is the Yolngu Matha language is Wikipedia is to be believed but various dialects of it (it was submitted for Best Foreign Language at the Oscars but didn’t get a nomination which is bonkers to be- should have been nominated- oddly also watched the film that won I also watched in this quarter). I have to say that the narration on this is one of the best I’ve ever heard-exceptional work by David Gulpilil.
Clare’s ranking- 4 stars
The Red Shoes (1948 England, dir Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger)
A young ballerina finds herself caught between her relationship with a ballet composer and her passion for the dance that is also driven by the controlling director of her company.
It is weird to say that I’m not watched any Pressburger and Powell films because this run of films- now I have watched two and this was the first. This film is often cited by many directors as one of the best films ever made (Scorsese, Coppola (the older one), and Spielberg all say it is one of their favourites) and is given as an example of film that should have won best picture and didn’t (Olivier’s Hamlet bet it). This is a very close second favourite for me of the films I watched this quarter and I can say both feature amazing eye make up. It is an excellent basically perfect film about the arts ,and about women being told that they cannot choose a career and a relationship, and about men being controlling as all get out. The performance by Moira Shearer is amazing especially considering that this is her first film and also that she is a ballerina so all the dancing is her. Also me being me and loving a dance sequence, the 17 minute ballet sequence in this film AMAZING.
Clare ranking- 5 stars
The Witches of Eastwick (1987 US, dir George Miller)
Three women, whose husbands aren’t in the picture (one divorced, one widowed, and one deserted by her husband but not divorced), don’t know that they are witches and don’t know that them meeting on the regularly has unknowingly made them a coven. A mysterious man arrives in town and tries to seduce all three women.
This had some camp appeal but it is the weakest film I’ve watched so far in my opinion. It is so 80s with the giant hair on women and so horny. The horniness is what tips it from campy to cringe at times. It is a bit disappointing that it isn’t better as the cast is stacked and George Miller is a capable director. Jack Nicholson does get to do some OTT scenery chomping which is fun and I particularly enjoyed Cher’s performance. The music is also good as it is John Williams- so odd that he did the music for a film like this. The big thing here is that the passing of 40 years have not been friendly to films of this type.
Clare’s ranking- 3 stars
All the President’s Men (1976 US, dir Alan J Pakula)
In the lead up to the 1972 election, two investigative reporters start to work on minor stories that link them to start to uncover a huge scandal for the Nixon administration.
This film was exceptional. I do love a fast paced script driven drama and that is what this is. There is a some controversy about the script which makes me surprised at how good it ultimately is- the legend that William Goldman is listed as the writer but supposedly some involved didn’t love the original script and Carl Bernstein punched it up with help of then girlfriend, Nora Ephron (yes the rom com writer/director) making Goldman not happy. The performances by Redford as Woodward and Hoffman as Bernstein are great. The film might completely fail the Bechdel test but otherwise great.
Clare’s ranking- 5 stars
Cabaret (1972 US, dir Bob Fosse)
In Weimar era Berlin, a young English man meets a free spirted young American cabaret performer, and the two form a friendship.
This film… what to say… it is EVERYTHING. I read the short stories it is partly based on years ago and even that didn’t prepare me for how much I would enjoy this. As someone who loves musicals, who loves strong female characters, who loves complex characters, and who loves diversity on screen, this is absolute perfection. This is my favourite film so far of everything I’ve watched and not just that but as soon as I saw it, I was like this might shoot up there to be one of my favourite films full stop. The swirling camp of the cabaret headed with the exception performances of Joel Grey as the emcee, expertly balanced with the personal drama for Sally and Brian and the broader societal drama that is present throughout as the film hints at the looming threats to their life style that is the emergence of the Nazi party (some of which are quite confronting). This film is so progressive for the early 70s in that multiple characters are queer and there is a plot line about abortion, and it is wild that it even got made at that time. Much like Terminator, I lucked out with Cabaret and got to see it on the big screen due to a retrospective screening, and so happy again to get that chance.
Clare’s ranking- 5 stars and if I could give it more than 5/5 I would
The Talented Mr Ripley (1999 US, dir Anthony Minghella)
A wealthy older man plays a young man he believes was at college with his son to go to Italy and retrieve his son who is living there with his girlfriend.
I knew the plot of this going in as I had been told and also I saw a play based partly on the book but also partly inspired by this film last year. I was unsure that I would buy Matt Damon as Ripley but somehow he makes it work and comes across as the right balance of at times naive and at others manipulative. Jude Law oozes charisma as Dicky even if his American accent does flatter at times. I also completely forgot Cate Blanchett was in this and always nice to have an Aussie pop up. The film looks beautiful which considering the setting of coastal Italy would be hard not to be. This is very well made so it does have some flaws.
Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars
In Bruges (2008 Ireland, dir Martin McDonagh)
Two hitmen are sent by their boss to spend downtime in Bruges after one of them makes an error on a job.
Many people told me to watch this as they think Irish black comedies with some violence are very much my vibe it seems. I definitely made a note to watch it after I saw McDonagh’s brilliant follow up with the same stars that was The Banshees of Inishireen (OK there are two other McDonagh films I’ve seen that came out between those two but I just really love Banshees- I prefer it to this even). This was so fun and I loved both Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson in it- whilst Gleeson is great in basically everything he is in, I do think there is something in Farrell that shines even brighter when he pairs with McDonagh. Also two films in a row that just make a part of Europe look great- even if in this case one of the characters is constantly complaining about how boring said part of Europe is.
Clare’s ranking- 4 stars
Das Leben der Andern (or The Lives of Others) (2006 Germany, dir Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck)
In East Berlin in the mid 80s, a dedicated Stasi agent is tasked with surveilling a popular playwright and his actress partner even though there is no evidence initially that either is actively working against the Soviet leadership.
This is an interesting film to watch in 2026 when the scent of authoritarianism is again in the wind in many countries and innocent citizens are again victim to this. It is interesting to balance out the fact that neither of the people being surveilled may have leant into support for the West if their fellow artists weren’t targeted- especially as the actress is sleeping with a politician to help her career even though she does love the playwright. The centre of the film though is the Stasi agent who is the ultimate company man until he starts for the sympathise with those he is observing. Ulrich Mühe is just exceptional as the Stasi agent and the film really belongs to him. I mentioned earlier that I watched Ten Canoes didn’t get nominated for Best Foreign Language film in its release year even though it submitted, this is the film that won that year.
Clare’s ranking- 4 stars
Misery (1990 US, dir Rob Reiner)
A famous romance writer has a car accident on a country road and is rescued by a local nurse who is his self-declared biggest fan.
I have been trying to avoid horror so as I will certainly watch some classic horror films in October but I failed at avoiding them just a tad. Second William Goldman script of the quarter and as my last October viewings showed I don’t hate a film based on a Stephen King novel (unless it is the most recent version of Salem’s Lot and yes I know my not having seen Shawshank also is contrary to that statement but I’m definitely more of a horror person than a prison film person). I did know what to expect going in as if you like horror at all, people tend to spoil the plot of King content. It is interesting as a reflection of King’s personal experience as he wrote this in response to his real life experiences in the late 80s- not the buckets of cocaine he was on, but more the fact that he started trying his hand at not horror and his fans came for him (though not as violent as happens here). Kathy Bates is perfectly unhinged as Annie Wilkes and the film belongs to her even though she was the less known of the leads- James Caan is solid, but Bates just steals the show.
Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars
Black Narcissus (1947 UK, dir Emeric Pressburger and Michael Powell)
A group of nuns are sent to a remote village in the Himalayas, and seek to run the local school and hospital even though the locals only welcome them as they have been told to by the local general.
As I said I watched two Pressburger and Powell films this quarter and this was the second. Whilst a good film, this is also an interesting relic of the 1940s as you would never see a film about the English occupation of India played this way nowadays. The film itself is beautifully made especially the exceptional painted backgrounds which are lovely- it was completely filmed in Pinewood Studios in the UK and the backgrounds are used to convey depth as well as location. Deborah Kerr is outstanding as the young woman who is suddenly put in the position of leading this group of nuns. The ways the nuns start to question their beliefs as they interact with the locals and with a government agent in the region really starts to show or at least to hint towards the idea that colonialism might not be a wise idea. The film is also very horny for a film about nuns- well 1940s horny when it comes to two of the nuns (Kerry’s character and a second who becomes completely obsessed with him) interact with the government agent. I enjoyed it especially as the nuns unravel as the film goes on but there are many elements that have not aged well- is that a hint of the “exotic” East corrupting the “pure” West? Yes it is. Is that a cultural stereotype that isn’t flattering? Yes it is. Worst of all, is that brown face casting? Yes with the exception of one character all the featured Indian characters are played by white people.
Clare’s ranking- 4 stars (though with the strong warnings about the poorly aged cultural representation)
Predator (1987 US, dir John McTiernan)
A team of commandos is sent into the jungle of somewhere in Central or South America to investigate a possible arms deal only to find there is something more dangerous hunting them.
That is right I have watched two Arnie classics since the beginning of the year and yes again did tip into the world of horror (since this has horror elements even if it is mainly sci fi action). John McTiernan directed what I believe to be the best action film ever made, Die Hard, so I had high hopes for the action sequences in this and boy did they deliver. Is a lot of this film very silly especially when compared to how smart the other Arnie action film I watched this year was? Damn right it is. At the same time, is this film a good time? Damn right it is. Arnie def should be dead in a world where science works but a lot of fun regardless. Also did love as an Arrested Development fan to see where the Carl Weathers clips in it came from. I want to see some of the more recent Predator content eventually as it ties in with the Alien world- I mean the super recent stuff not Alien vs Predator as I’ve already seen the first of those and it is bad- so I might need to keep going with these but I do hear that this films generally are more dumb, bad fun than actually good. To confirm this was my more cult thing for April having skipped doing one of those in March.
Clare’s ranking- 3 stars
The Lady Vanishes (1938 UK, dir Alfred Hitchcock)
A young woman is on a train travelling back to England to reunite with her fiancé after a trip to Europe. She meets an older woman on the train but then the older woman disappears and everyone else on the train claims she never existed except one guy who offers to help her out.
Got to love some gaslighting- so much gaslighting. It is worrying how many old films that is the premise of. I do like a story set on a train as you are moving but at the same time stuck so for something like this, you have a set group of people to interview about this disappearing woman but you are still travelling. You know you are in safe hands with anything Hitchcock directed- he was a not great human but he was talented director and no getting around that- and I will even fight for some of the ones that others aren’t fans of. The film is very tense and it is excellent that even though there is a lot of gaslighting that there is one person who sides with the protagonist so she isn’t just treated as if she is going crazy. It is also at times a lot of fun with the some comedy from the supporting characters including what is a barely coded gay couple who are obsessed with cricket (they legit share a bed and a pair of PJs- good thing Hitchcock was in the UK at this point as no way this would have got through in the code era US). I do love a bit of early Hitchcock and when he dips his toes into something not thriller or horror as he does with the supporting characters here.
Clare’s ranking- 4 stars
So that is my older films to date this year- well until April, I just watched my first one for May. I’m going to keep powering through looking for more films I have managed to miss this year and continue to hope for more random big screen viewings as I got for a couple of these.