Sunday, November 8, 2026

"No-one stores cotton candy like this"

 And spooooooky season has once again just ended so once again so has my horror binge...

This year I was a little more sane and only got to 32 films (well I'm adding a 33rd)- much better for the brain than the other 40 last year. So what did I watch this year...

Film 1- Resident Evil (2026)

What is scary- mutated zombie type creatures

General or non horror people content warning- buckets of gore (and then some), animal death, child death, and if you don't like abortion plot lines there is one.

Plot- A medical courier, in a attempt to delay a conversation with his girlfriend about the fact she has just discovered she is pregnant, accepts a last minute urgent delivery to Raccoon City despite the fact his car is not equipped for the snowy mountain landscape on the way there. He hits a woman on the road in the middle of the woods and though possibly alive, she is very injured, non verbal, and tried to bite him.

Short review- this third Zach Cregger written and directed horror film is a hoot. I have never played the Resident Evil games or seen the previous films of them, but I have seen both Barbarian and Weapons so I came to this more as a person who likes Cregger films and zombies than a fan of the games. I think the earlier Cregger films are smarter but this is just a lot of fun. It plays with the comic energy of end of the Weapons and though it doesn't reach those heights (the Gladys and the kids scene was one of my favourite scenes in any film in 2025), it carries the humour for a longer window. Its visuals perfectly echo the vibe of first person shooter- I think it is the most effective take on that in a film. Everyone should also want an audience like mine when I saw this as it was clear everyone knew what they were in for and was there for it, and that made the film even better and this an even better start to October. That said if you don't do horror, this ain't for you as it is buckets of gore.

New to me or a rewatch- This is still at the cinema so obviously new to me (I will say very few rewatches this year)- I think it maybe just landed for rent or purchase on streaming.

Where did I watch it- the cinema

Film 2-  Vivarium (2019)

What is scary- unescapable suburbia and sudden cuckoo child

General or non horror people content warning- the housing crisis, creepy child who watches you at all times (ALL times), and some trippy creepy pasta vibes for a bit

Plot- A couple (Jesse Eisenberg and Imogen Poots) are looking to buy their first home. A creepy real estate agent takes them to a housing development and then abandons them and when they try to leave, they find they cannot. As they are trapped in the housing estate, mysterious deliveries of food and essentials arrive, and then one day, the deliveries include a baby who ages fast.

Short review- this film was at times heavy handed- for example Poots' character who is a teacher talks to a kid about cuckoos in the opening scene- and at other times just shows wasted potential. There is something here about the housing crisis, commitment struggles, and possibly even fertility struggles, but all of it is not developed. Also the two leads don't have enough chemistry to carry this as the two hander it is for many scenes. It wasn't good enough to be good, or bad/dumb enough to be good bad. It was just dull.

New to me or a rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 3- Totally Killer (2023)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- some gore, though this is definitely on the comedy end of comedy horror

Plot- In the 1980s, a killer killed three girls on their 16th birthday but then disappeared and was never caught. In 2023, Jamie (Kiernan Shipka) is the teenage daughter of a woman who was friends with all of the original victims. On Halloween when handing out candy, her mother is killed by what seems to be the killer returned. Jamie is later chased by the killer and she hides in the time machine her friend has been making and it activates and sends Jamie back to the time of the killer's original spree. 

Short review- this definitely leans more comedy than horror for a lot of its run time with an emphasis on the ways society has changed since the 1980s. It wasn't an amazing film but I had a fun time with it as it had a lot of nods to cheesy 80s horror. I think if you were someone looking to gradually get into horror this (and the film Final Girls which has some similar vibes) would be a good place to start as the horror is there but it is fairly tame. I would watch it again as it was a bit of fun, and also I want to support the director as she created one of my fave sitcoms (Don't Trust the B*tch in Apartment 23).

New to me or a rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 4- Hungry (2026)

What is scary- hippos

General or non horror people content warning- some blood and sigh racism 

Plot- two young women on a trip to Louisiana opt to go on a gator tour. Before the tour starts, they are at the starting point and the people on the tour are told about an old plan to bring hippos to Louisiana and farm them. On the tour, a wealthy woman pays the tour guide to go off course to find the biggest gator but then they find they are under attack by something bigger.

Short review- whilst not the worst film as a film that I watched all month, this was the one I enjoyed the least. The script and acting were both awful, and there were not enough hippos. The title on its own should have been a warning as in the film they point out several times that hippos are vegetarian, which means by definition if they are going for humans, they ain't hungry and no just the reference to the game didn't make it work. Also I just need to call out the fact that for a lot of the run time the biggest villain is the black woman who the film points out cannot swim which sigh is some straight racism which in 2026 you have no excuse for. Having just seen hippos in the wild in Africa, seeing their canine teeth and seeing one try and charge on that trip as it was protecting a baby was basically scarier than anything here. 

New to me or a rewatch- New and I definitely would not rewatch

Where did I watch it - Disney+

Film 5- Hellraiser (1987)

What is scary- pain loving alien types OR reanimated creepy dude

General or non horror people content warning- If you don't do horror, don't watch this basically. Buckets of gore, blood, and goo, and some S&M vibes

Plot- A man, Frank, buys a puzzle box which he uses to summon the pain loving cenobites who pull him into their pain dimension where they torture him. This man's brother and sister-in-law move into his old house in London, and when a drop of blood falls on the floor of the attic (where Frank went to pain dimension), Frank starts to reanimate piece by piece and he enlists his sister-in-law (with whom he previously had an affair) to help him fully restore himself. 

Short review- this is definitely not for the faint hearted. I really did enjoy it as for all the sex and pain vibes, it does try and lay over that some 80s morality using Frank's niece, Kirsty. I definitely found Frank (even pre pain dimension that we see in flashback) more of a villain than Pinhead and their cenobite pals. The man says "come to daddy" more than once and yuck to that always. There are things that didn't make sense like the fact they never cleaned up that attic, that they were mostly American but were in London for some reason, and that ending (I mean what happens with the unhoused guy which was also great). The film does have something to say about the quest for new experiences above all else and also about 80s capitalism.

New to me or a rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 6- Forte (2025)

What is scary- mysterious cult like film music recording retreat

General or non horror people content warning- blood and attempted sexual assault

Plot- a young composer arrives at studio to record for an upcoming film to work her dream job but something isn't quite right.

Short review- first film not in English this October (one of three K horrors) and the second shortest (only 78 mins). The film is in segments and I found it not the easiest to follow the plot as it at times shows dreams as if they are reality. There was something here about artistic ownership especially when it comes to work by young women and the film was well made, but just don't ask me the plot details.

New to me or a rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- SBS on Demand

Film 7- Drag me to Hell (2009)

What is scary- Romani curse

General or non horror people content warning- gore including not a small amount of both blood and vomit

Plot- a woman, Christine, working as a loan officer in a bank is told by her boss that if she wants to the promotion she is up for she needs to be tougher and more decisive. Then an older Romani woman comes in asking for an extension on a loan and Christine denies it leading to the woman cursing her. 

Short review- this was the first Sam Raimi horror I ever saw and it is still a film I love. There is a lot of gore and goo so this isn't for everyone, but if you like horror, this is an easy film to love. It is a lot of fun and at times very funny (the exorcism scene is amazing- that goat should get all the acting awards). It plays from the established Raimi playbook and it also is definitely really doing an interesting job reflecting the sub prime mortgage crisis in a really effective and definitely intended way. I would flag it does use the now outmoded term for the Romani people- in 2026 I question the plot of Romani curse being used at all but we have to keep previous iterations of it as I still need this film and Buffy in my life. 

New to me or a rewatch- as is clear from the above, it is a rewatch (one of two this October)

Where did I watch it- SBS on Demand

Film 8- Killer Klowns from Outer Space (1988)

What is scary- alien clowns

General or non horror people content warning- clowns

Plot- alien clowns unleash mayhem on a small American town

Short review- this film is dumb fun. No-one can act but a lot of them are doing the most. The plot makes no sense but I just don't care. The montage of clown killings is amazing, the janky special effects are great, and the music cues are next level. Also this film has a theme song that is next level. It does what it says on the tin and even if it does it poorly, it was the type of rubbish film I'm OK with. Oh and yes the title of this post is a quote from this film.

New to me or rewatch- New

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 9- Demons (1985)

What is scary- demons

General or non horror people content warning- gore especially of the green goo variety

Plot- a woman is given a ticket to a free film screening and gets her friend to come along. As they watch the film, something starts going awry and the demons being summoned on the screen appear to be being summoned in the real world too.

Short review- I should have said with the last film, this started a run of bonkers 1980s horror. Again here nothing makes sense. The film is clearly filmed in West Berlin (you can tell if you have been to Berlin) but it is in Italian because it is technically an Italian film (one of four Italian films I watched this October). The 2026 part of my brain was also like "why would any woman accept free film tickets from a creepy guy on the train" so was trying to reject the premise but I fought to overcome that and had a great time. There is a lot of goo at play and some violent deaths. I do think it missed the opportunity to make the usher with great resting bitch face in on the whole demon thing.

New to me or rewatch- New

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 10- Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- lots of violent death

Plot- two months after the events of Friday the 13th, Alice, the final girl from that film, is attacked in her house.  Five years later, around the lake from Camp Crystal Lake (aka Camp Blood) a new training site for camp counsellors has opened and the first group of trainees have rocked up for training there... but is someone watching them.

Short review- it is a very long time since I watched Friday the 13th and thinking of the big 70s/80s horror franchises, I found it weaker than A Nightmare on Elm Street and, now that I've seen in, Hellraiser, and significantly weaker than the film that it was made to rip off, Halloween (by far the best of these). I have never previously gone past film one of these franchises except Elm Street as they are known to be weak.  This watch was in part inspired by the just released Crystal Lake series. I don't have any qualms about spoiling Friday the 13th as Scream does it in its opening scene (I def saw Scream first so it was spoilt for me) but it was time to finally spend some time with Jason Voorhees after his mommy in the first film. That said I was not ready for the fact that this is proto Jason without his signature hockey mask (he is rocking a sack or a pillow case or similar) and he alternates the machete with other weapons. The film packs in way too much cannon fodder for its runtime so get prepped for zero character development for most people. Pros for the film- Ginny has the makings of a great final girl even if she needed more character development, the classic Friday the 13th score, and the film is open to having a wheelchair user just a normal part of the counsellor group (he gets zero character development but just him being there was more progressive than I expected from this). Cons- mommy Vorhees is more interesting than Jason as she talks, lack of character development, and creepy 80s male gaze vibes at times (could have been worse I hear as like the first entry in this franchise this was heavily cut for violence but unlike it, it was also cut for nudity as they discovered after filming that an actress was underage and had to cut her nudity (the film's main sex scene features this actress and even before I knew about the edit, I was like something is odd here as this is 80s horror and there are no boobs in this sex scene).  I will warn that in a bit, I'm going to say parts of this film were plagiarised which they definitely were. 

New to me or rewatch- obviously from above, new

Where did I watch it- Stan

Film 11- Sleepaway Camp (1983)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- violent murders, adults who should not be around children, bullying, homophobia, and transphobia 

Plot- Two children are boating with their father when one of the children and their father die have their boat collides with other one. Cut forward a few years and the surviving child who now lives with their aunt is headed off to camp with their cousin. They get to camp and people start dying.

Short review- I said the last film was inspired by its prequel series, I will also say watching that and this were inspired by one of my favourite 2026 films to date, Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma, which draws heavily on 1980s horror especially this film and the Friday the 13th films. I have never been more on a killer's side than here as the older teens and adults are the worst- one of them is definitely a sex offender on my read- and deserve their fates. I will say for that and the character development, this film is better than Friday the 13th Part 2 but only just and that is before I get to the ending. I also say I appreciated that the teens were largely teens and not 30 somethings, and that this was an 80s slasher with no boobs (sigh that I bookended it with two films that went the other way) and which seems to be keener on getting men naked or less clothed than women (odd considering the ending and that this was directed by a straight man). It is also well camp which I always appreciate in a slasher. That said, I have say, though I know some LGBT+ folks do appreciate this film for its camp elements, the ending just hard no. It is notorious for a reason and well problematic- that said without it we wouldn't have Camp Miasma so something good to come from it.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Youtube for free- it isn't available in a non dodgy way in Australia

Film 12- The Slumber Party Massacre (1982)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- violent murders, a film that could have been feminist being ruined by men in development

Plot- one of the night after the driller killer escapes from prison, a group of teen girls gathers for a slumber party. Valerie, a new student at their school and the neighbour of the girl throwing the party, is invited but declines the invite as she heard the host bitching about her and also she has to babysit her younger sister. 

Short review- my first experience of the Slumber Party franchise was an odd one and it wasn't watching this film. When I was 19, someone put on the second film in the franchise in the early hours of morning at a party, and everyone fell asleep, only for me to wake up during the film's most infamous scene- spoiler but not really as I believe it is on the poster, the killer attaches his drill to a guitar in the second film and there is a guitar solo- which was a deeply confusing experience at about 3am. So my previous experience was about five very confusing minutes of the sequel that I saw over 20 years ago. This film is a giant missed opportunity. The writer and director were both women, and the script was originally a dark feminist comedy parodying the cliched 80s slasher. Unfortunately for everyone, then Hollywood got involved. There are occasional flashes of the original script- there was a Koolaid that I really liked- but otherwise it was morphed into the slasher it was meant to parody. There are a bunch of unnecessary boob shots and most of the characters are watered down to bitchy 80s cliches. The kills are fun and it is super short (shortest film I watched at 76 mins) but it just hints at a better film that could have been. 

New to me or rewatch- as mentioned, new

Where did I watch it- Youtube for free- again not available in a non dodgy way in Australia, and even the version I found blurred boobs (which I didn't care so much about) and some violence (which I wasn't happy about)

Film 13- Soulm8te (2026)

What is scary- killer sex bot

General or non horror people content warning- squashed penises (legit two of them), a lot of blood and violence, also not a small amount of sex starting in the opening credits

Plot- A lonely widowed programmer works at a company that is bought out by a bigger robotics and AI firm. The new firm has developed a chat bot that is very successful and they are using that chat bot to inform a companion bot they have developed, and they ask him to beta test the bot.

Short review- I said companion bot above but that is sugar coating it, the bot is always just a sex bot and the credits make that clear. This film is by the makers of M3gan which I have not seen but hear is fun, so even though this was direct to streaming I gave it a chance. It ain't great and it really suffers from comparison to two other films- one from 2025 that I won't spoil as the thing in it that links to this film is a twist, and Obsession which is one of my favourite films so far this year. It is also unclear here which point the film is going for. If it was meant to be more feminist, the sex bot needed to be more sympathetic, the control of her will by a man more condemned, and the film needed to make this more clear than squashed penises. If the bot is just a villain, well that is a story told to many times. I want to support female written and directed horror but I definitely would not rewatch this.

New to me or rewatch- New to me

Where did I watch it- Disney+

Film 14- A Bay of Blood (1971)

What is scary- mysterious killer

General or non horror people content warning- much blood and gore

Plot- an old woman is killed by her husband only for him to then be killed afterwards. Cut forward a bit and you meet the residents of the area around the bay next to which they lived, some tourists, and the relatives of the dead man.

Short review- oh Italian horror, I do love you. Though not the best film as a film, this was one of my two favourites this October. The director of this film, Mario Bava, is actually the father of the director of Demons. Though not my first Italian horror (even of this October), it is my first time with a film that is technically classed as a giallo film- the Italian horror/crime film genre that was most popular in the 70s. This film is beautiful on every level- the cinematography, the glamour make up, and the horror make up are perfection (much like Suspiria all the blood is orange paint). The film, despite being Italian, will normally be found in English in most English speaking countries as it was filmed in both languages and released in the appropriate one for the country. The film builds a bridge between soap opera and horror that I would love more of- the back story here, I would love as a soap opera. The film on release was controversial for its violence and was shown at drive ins and late night screenings under a collection of names- it was even paired so often with Last House on the Left that at times it was shown as Last House on the Left 2 which is interesting considering that Last House on the Left was infamously banned in a lot of places, this has no plot cross over, and I've not seen Last House on the Left but there is no chance this gets anywhere near its violence or controversy as violence here is again orange paint. Finally the ending of this film is just perfection.

I mentioned that Friday the 13th Part 2 plagiarised something and this is it. There are two murders that films takes nearly shoot for shoot from this film, and this film does both better.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime 

Film 15- Slumber Party Massacre (2021)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- violence and blood

Plot- in 1993, a group of teens at a slumber party are attacked by the driller killer and only one survives. Cut to 2021 and the teen daughter of the survivor is off on a weekend away with her friends (also crashed by younger sister of one of the friends). Their car breaks down in Jolly Springs, the renamed town that was where the original killings happened.

Short review- Remakes are often not something I jump to watch but this one I gave a chance and I found it better than the original. The writer and director of this film (like the original one both women) wanted to make the film that the original one was meant to be, and though the script isn't super strong and on occasion says the quiet part aloud, it gets at what the original could have been had 1980s Hollywood not got involved. It has feminist themes throughout, it subverts the horror genre especially as it existed at the time of the original film, and it reclaims the gaze- it is all women looking at men here. The actors seem to be having a good time and it has some great kill scenes (one of my faves all October is in this). Aside from the at times weak script, I wanted it to push the jokes and subversion more- for example, the names of the male characters are Guy, Guy, John, Sean, and Matthew, and I really wish they had gone with Jack, Juan, or Ioan instead of Matthew, as two guys names Guy, and three versions of John would have been hilarious.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 16- The Amityville Horror (1979)

What is scary- haunted, murdery house

General or non horror people content warning- house that yells at you, insects, creepy child, small amounts of violence, and in the last five minutes blood and a storm

Plot- a newly wed couple (James Brolin and Margot Kidder) buy a large house in which a murder previously happened. When they move in along with her kids from a previous relationship, she invites their local priest over and the house tells him to "GET OUT". Her daughter also has acquired a new friend who no one else can see, and she is being super creepy.

Short review- yawn! Nothing happens for most of this film and it is too long. There was potentially something interesting here as like now, the late 1970s were a big time for housing insecurity. The house is very cheap in 2026 money but in 1979 money it is bonkers that they pay $80,000 for a slightly run down house that had a murder occur in it. Housing insecurity is legitimately scary but instead this film just goes hard for about ten minutes at the end with a small amount of blood and a storm as its "big" scare. I will give the film this, it has two very attractive leads (both are peak 70s hot) and without we would not have had the comedy sketch that led to the creation of one of my favourite films, Get Out.

New to me or rewatch- New and unlikely to watch again 

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 17- Child's Play (1988)

What is scary- murder doll

General or non horror people content warning- creepy doll, and violence.. Also slightly annoying child

Plot- Karen is a widower who is struggling to make ends meet, and it is her son's birthday and he desperately wants a particular doll. Her friend finds someone selling the doll for cheap behind the department store they work at. Karen gives the doll to her son, and doll introduces itself as Chucky. 

Short review- This poor mother, she has to deal with her slightly annoying child making her the worst breakfast available even you get the whole murder doll vibe. This film is a lot of fun and well camp. Brad Dourif's voice acting as Chucky is excellent. It has great 80s effects especially the first murder by Chucky. Definitely planning to watch more in the series even if I found Andy (the kid) annoying. Even I hadn't enjoyed this film as much I did, I would be giving it flowers now after the creator of Chucky clapped back at Nikki Minaj about the US midterms.

New to me or rewatch- New and would 100% rewatch

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

"Film" 19- Over the Garden Wall (2014)

What is scary- being children lost in the mysterious place

General or non horror people content warning- none. This is a cartoon for that I think most kids could watch.

Plot- two brothers, Wirt and Greg, are lost in the Unknown, a mysterious fantasy land. Accompanied by a sassy bluebird, Beatrice, they try to travel through this place to get home. They are immediately warned about the Beast, an evil entity lurking in the woods of the Unknown.

Short review- this is a bit of a cheat as it isn't a film but a TV miniseries. That said the episodes are 12 minutes long and there are only 10 of them, so at two hours total it is shorter than some films I watched. I have heard a lot of people watch this adorable series every October and I can see why. The animation is great and the characters adorable. The whole plot of Greg naming his frog about three different things in every episode is hilarious, and Beatrice definitely brings an energy I relate to. The voice cast is stacked with Elijah Wood voicing Wirt, Melanie Lynskey Beatrice, Christopher Lloyd the character of the Woodsman, and John Cleese and Tim Curry popping up across the series too. Now it isn't very scary for an adult but there are definitely episodes that give Halloween vibes- the second episode has jack o lantern people for example, and has creepy themes if you were a kid. It was one of the best things I watched all October.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- HBO Max

Film 20- The Pit and the Pendulum (1961)

What is scary- creepy brother in law and the inquisition

General or non horror people content warning- some scares are a bit jumpy, and lots of torture themes

Plot- In the 16th century, an English nobleman travels to Spain after the death of his sister to investigate what happened to her. He arrives at the castle of his brother in law (played by Vincent Price) and discovers his brother in law is slightly unhinged and his suspicions are peaked.

Short review- mandatory Vincent Price film for this October and as a plus, one of his many appearances in a Richard Corman adaptation of a Poe story. Until its final act, the film isn't really the Poe story which is more about the inquisition and the torture, but as an expansion of what Poe was going for, it works. Price is perfect camp in the dual role of the protagonist's brother in law and that character's inquisitor father. Did I care that this was meant to be Spain and no-one was Spanish?  If it was made this year, I would have been but it is from the 60s so all I wanted was the camp and this definitely was that. What ends up revealed as the fate of the protagonist's sister, iconic.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 21- Clayface (2026)

What is scary- body horror

General or non horror people content warning- body horror (tonnes of it), blood, gore, and some intense violence for a comic book film.

Plot- Matt Hagen is a rising actor who returns to Gotham for a film premiere. At a club, he locks eyes with the girlfriend of one of Gotham's many mobsters, and after Matt sleeps with her, the mobster and his goons slice Matt to pieces especially his face. In the quest to get his life back and fix his face, Matt links up with a scientist who is working with a AI driven artificial flesh.

Short review- I do love me a comic book film and this film was the perfect intersection of comic book film and horror. It has some of the most intense violence and gore of anything I watched all October, and didn't miss the fact that I didn't a Cronenberg this October as this brought the body horror. The scene in the airplane bathroom where Matt's eyes start to glue over is one of the most intense horror scenes I've seen in a while. It makes me excited that the Batman corner of the DCU might be ready to go as hard as the comics hint it should. The performances were great, the body horror was the right amount of gross, and this delivered a successful film version of Clayface which I didn't think was doable. I really liked it.

New to me or rewatch- obviously new 

Where did I watch it- the cinema (it only came out at end of October)

Film 22- The Cat o' Nine Tails (1971)

What is scary- serial killer

General or non horror people content warning- violence but not much gore, and the best train death since Anna Karenina.

Plot- A journalist is investigating a murder in Rome, and the murder soon turns into a series of murders that appear to be linked with a genetics company. The journalist ends up teaming up with a blind former journalist to dig into what happened.

Short review- back to the Italian horror and one of two Dario Argento giallos for this October. This was the two in Argetto's three animal based giallos, and though there were elements I like, this one was a bit heavier on the crime than the horror and the biologist in me (the one who never uses her biology degree) hated the ending. That said it was a solid crime procedural and I'm not writing it off. It just wasn't horror enough for an October. I will give it a lot of points for two things, the somersault train death and the scene in a gay bar which was pretty progressive for the 1970s (well in other parts of the world it would be, it might be the norm in Italy for all I know). 

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 23- Brightburn (2019)

What is scary- evil teen superman

General or non horror people content warning- blood, gore, violence, and stalking

Plot- a couple who are struggling to conceive adopt a child but where did they get said child to adopt? In his early teens, the boy starts to show signs of having superpowers but he also seems to want to use them for evil.

Short review- normally I'm here for anything James Gunn associated and I like an evil Superman story, but this one was a bit meh. There was much more it could have done and sadly for it, The Boys was one of my favourite shows of recent years and it did the more and I saw it first. The film is not particularly scary most of the time and the violence would have been over the top if the kid had these powers. The creepiest element of the film was the way the boy interacts with a girl in his class that he has a crush on, and sits in that slightly too real (in the manosphere corrupted world of 2026) space for a beat too long.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Stan

Film 24- The Parenting (2025)

What is scary- a homophobic haunted house

General or non horror people content warning- some blood and gore but this is more on the comedy end of comedy horror

Plot- a gay couple have booked a vacation house for a weekend away where they are going to introduce their parents to each other, and one half of the couple is planning to propose over the weekend. The parents show up and one couple is a wealthier couple who adopted their son from overseas as a child, and the other is a more cliched middle class American family. Though they should have been thrown by the odd woman who meets them when they show up, they ignore that and settle in and soon enough odd things start happening.

Short review- The cast here is bonkers. The wealthier parents are Edie Falco and Brian Cox, the middle class ones Lisa Kudrow and Dean Norris, and the weird neighbour is Parker Posey. I will watch anything with Parker Posey in it and this came out the same year as she owned it on The White Lotus, and once again she doing her classic the most here. That all said, the script here is very weak and cliched. I wanted so much better for it but it wasn't doing anything new nor was it scary.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- Foxtel

Film 25- Poltergeist (1982)

What is scary- what the title says... a poltergeist

General or non horror people content warning- most of this is pretty tame but there is lot of pink goo, and one face peeling scene

Plot- a family living in housing estate (the suburban middle class US version, not the UK lower class version) find their youngest daughter sitting in front of the TV when it is static late at night. Soon after chaos starts to reign and the house is getting super haunted.

Short review- though I think most people could watch this, it is also well creepy. The point where Carol Anne sing song voices "They're here" pretty chilling even though I knew it was coming. Sadly for the film, time has not been kind to this film and it takes a lot of translating in 2026. Not as it has aged poorly, but more that technology has changed so rapidly. I remember back when the TV went to the off air pattern at night- in Australia it more likely went to that with classical music in the background than just static but I did know that static was often the option in other countries. However folks born after the mid 1990s would likely not remember this and though this is the biggest change from the 1980s, it isn't the only one and definitely if someone was born after 2000, I think they would need someone next to them telling them what things are.  All that aside as someone who was alive in the 1980s, I had a great time. The effects were often great- the clown doll was creepy, the tree monster was effective, the face that melts off is even more stop motion effects madness than the similar scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark, and even bits where they are just load up the janky 1980s CGI I appreciate. Also the teen girl in this film is a hero- she is off living her own life and as soon as weird crap starts, she dips. I will say that I did get thrown when it is clear that the teen girl was born when the mother of the house was a teen- it is mentioned that she is 32 and the teen is clearly 16 or 17 and I can maths even if Spielberg and friends can't.

New to me or rewatch- I'm in repeat mode there, as mentioned most of these are new to me. Oddly I didn't watch this one as a teen or kid.

Where did I watch it- paid to rent it on Amazon Prime, it isn't included in any steaming service without cost

Film 26- Kwaidan (1964)

 What is scary- ghosts

General or non horror people content warning- this does not need much of a warning but the ending of the third story is a bit bloody.

Plot- four Japanese folk stories told over three hours. Firstly, a samurai leaves his wife in Kyoto for a business prospect and an advantageous new marriage in another city, but he dreams of returning to his first wife. Secondly, when in the woods, a woodsman and his apprentice encounter a pale woman who kills the woodsman but leaves the apprentice alive. Thirdly, a blind musician who lives in a monastery is known for playing a piece about a particular battle, and then one night someone comes and asks him to play for the noble for whom he works. Finally, an author is waiting for his publisher, and as he waits he recounts an incomplete folk story about a samurai who sees another man's face in his tea.

Short review- this anthology film is beautiful and has the hallmarks of this era of Japanese film that often harken back to the feudal era (except the bits featuring the author in the fourth story which are in the early 20th century, all of the stories are set in the feudal era). The film is based on collections of folk stories that were recorded by a particular author in the early 20th century- it is named for one of his collections (Kwaidan means ghost story) though only two of the stories are from that collection and the other two are from others. My favourite of the four stories was "The Woman of the Snow" (the second story) which had spectacular painted skies though I would also shout out "Hoichi the Earless" (the third story) for the performance of the lead actor. The stories, except the last one, all have a through line of regret and revenge, and you can see why you would link them together. It was the best film as a film that I watched all October though I will say that sadly it ends on the weakest story and it might have been stronger (5 stars instead of the 4.5 I gave it on Letterboxd) without it.

New to me or rewatch- new 

Where did I watch it- SBS on Demand

Film 27- The Bird with the Crystal Plumage (1970)

What is scary- mystery killer

General or non horror people content warning- blood and violence, and lots of killer cam.

Plot- An American writer living in Rome is making plans to return to return to the States taking his Italian girlfriend with him. The day before he is due to fly out, he sees what he thinks is a woman being attacked and the police tell him that he has to remain in Rome whilst they investigate. He discovers that the attack is likely linked to a series of murders of young women in the city, and he starts to investigate it.

Short review- this was first film in Dario Argento's animal series, and unlike A Cat o' Nine Tails, this is exactly what I want in October viewing. It is a very smart for a 1970 film in that the initial attack does some interesting things with perception as the main character is so traumatised by it that even though he was looking at it directly, he cannot remember the specifics. It nails the yellow that giallo is name for- everything is a "lovely" shade of 1970s yellow. You can also see the powerful influence that it had on future films especially slashers of the late 70s and early 80s. I don't think I've seen as much killer cam pre that era of slashers before (I mean The Bay of Blood had a little of it but nothing on this film), and it is clear that the American horror film makers took notes from this. It also is really tense in parts mainly when the main character's girlfriend is involved- the scene where she tries to break their apartment window with a candle stand to escape the killer was one of my favourites of the film. This was my last Italian film for the month and it was a great run that just showed why they were so known for horror at that time, especially as something like this is so much smarter than American horror of the same era.

New to me or not- new 

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 28- Ghoulies (1984)

What is scary- devil worship

General or non horror people content warning- it is pretty tame, there is a like a wee bit of blood. Really bad acting and script maybe.

Plot- a young man inherits his family's old house, and he and his girlfriend move in. He seems to become obsessed with working on the house and it seems like he might be getting his demon worship on.

Short review- you might see I don't mention the Ghoulies above but that is because this film definitely not what it says on the tin. It was made in the aftermath of Gremlins in the hopes to capitalise on its success by not understanding that that the Gremlins were the reason that film was popular and not some broad reason for them. This film is super dooper bad. It is low budget, the script is a big wall of cliches, and the acting is just dreadful- some actors are trying to do the most but not in a way that I found to be camp fun. As an example of its badness, the writer decided it needed narration but then forgot about that after two instances of it. It is the worst film as a film that I watched all month but if there is a time to watch something rocking in at 7% from critics on Rotten Tomatoes that time is October. I did make the mistake of watching this sober and I think it would be fun with wines and a planned drinking game. Finally, yes Law and Order:SVU fans that is a baby faced Detective Benson you spy- Mariska Hargitay plays one of the couple's friends.

New to me or not- new

Where did I watch it- Amazon Prime

Film 29- The Fog (1980)

What is scary- leprosy ridden pirate ghosts

General or non horror people content warning- some blood, gore, and violence. Jump scares.

Plot- A small coastal town is prepping to commemorate its centenary. Mysterious things start happening and then a glowing fog descends on the town.

Short review- Nothing cooks like a John Carpenter score. This was my Carpenter film for this October and though I was having a lot of fun with it regardless, the score just tipped it over the edge. The effects feel peak 80s even if you then realise this was doing them earlier than most. The ghosts are good and sneaky and creepy, and it gets tense at times. I also now have my retirement plan to go and run a radio station from a lighthouse.

New to me or not- new

Where did I watch it- paid for it on YouTube- it isn't included in any streamers

Film 30- The Cabin in the Woods (2011)

This is an annual watch so if you want my thoughts on it go back two years at https://clarewoodley.blogspot.com/2024/11/im-into-survival.html 

Film 31- House (1977)

What is scary- a house

General of non horror people content warning- a few scares are a little jumpy and a literal flood of blood (granted red cordial blood)

Plot- Seven girls (who are called....wait for it... Gorgeous, Fantasy, Prof, Mac, Melody, Sweet, and Kung Fu) go to stay at the country house of one of their aunt's after their original holiday trip plans were cancelled. Something in the house is mighty weird...

Short review- This film is amazing and insane. You will continually ask yourself what the filmmakers were on, and if you have picked up a contact high. Most of the cast were not professional actors but damn are they having fun. The plot makes less than zero sense most of the time but who cares. Where did that baby that Gorgeous plays with in the early scenes come from, how is it so hard to get a bucket off your butt, why does a character seem to enjoy being eaten by a piano, why are there bananas, is there a bear at that restaurant, is there a wind machine perpetually around Gorgeous's future step mother, why is Kung Fu wearing bikini bottoms not pants, should I be offended on Mac's behalf for the comment about her finding a potato field to snack on (relatable content), how and why is cat, are we animated now- just some of my questions from this film. And for all those questions, I just don't care about the answers as I was having the best time as this film is awesome. Particular shout out to Kung Fu who is the tough girl of the group whose solution to things is "kick them" - she was def my fave and to explain the nicknames, Gorgeous is very beautiful and also very privileged (it is her aunt's house), Fantasy lives in her fantasy world and has a big crush on their teacher, Prof is the smart girl with glasses, Mac loves to eat (the Mac isn't from McDonalds though, it is from... wait for it... stomach), Melody plays lots of instruments, Sweet is just very sweet and accommodating, and Kung Fu is kick arse. For all its weirdness, the film is also at times stunning with some exceptional animation and painted scenery. This came out the same year as Suspiria and wow with all the colours in both that would be an excellent double feature. So Japan in the 1970s, not sure what you were on, but if this is the type of film you make on it, have at it.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- the cinema at a Halloween night special event. I've been wanting to watch House for years and it sadly isn't normally available in Australia.

Film 32- A Tale of Two Sisters (2003)

What is scary- a step mother

General and non horror people content warning- many things- jump scares, blood, violence, child neglect, child abuse, trauma, suicide, unhealthy medication use, and disassociation 

Plot- After the death of their mother and it is hinted something else, a father returns with his two daughters to their house where he has moved in their new stepmother. The father seems disinterested in his daughters and the stepmother is actively abusive of the younger girl which the father does not believe. Both girls appear to see ghosts or other evidence of haunting around the house.

Short review- K-horror bringing it. This was likely the darkest thing I watched all October. I'm hoping the warnings don't give you hints of where it might go. You might figure it out- I did for the most part- but it builds and twists. It is one of those films that you end up analysing after you finish it. It is well creepy and at times very jump scary. Early in the film, I thought it might be doing something about periods but thankfully in many reasons this is not periods be scary film. The performances by the four leads are great and I think especially the stepmother is outstanding.

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- again cinema at a Halloween night special event. I did spy it on SBS on Demand a while back and it might still be there.

Film 33- Thirst (2009)

What is scary- vampires 

General and non horror people content warning- blood, and elder abuse

Plot- a priest who works at a hospital volunteers to be part of a medical study of a disease that has been impacting primarily Catholic priests on mission in Africa. He recovers from the disease unlike many others and he becomes a bit of legend with people thinking he has healing power. He meets the mother of someone he knew as a younger man and when she invites him around to dinner, the priest finds himself drawn to his friend's wife. Soon the priest is not just having an affair with this woman, but also has discovered that the virus has had him a vampire.

Short review- I do love a Chan-wook Park film and this is one of the ones I had not seen. It has his combo of being beautifully shot and also super sexy (well not all his films are sexy but see what I read last year about Stoker or watch the slow burn of Decision to Leave which in my mind is a basically perfect film (it is my second favourite Park film)). This film leans into the underlying sexy that is inherent in the vampire genre and I needed a vampire film for the October (I did watch it on 1 November though). It is a bit long which is my only complaint. Also the performances are great from Korean cinema legend Kang-hp Song as the priest and especially as Ok-vin Kim as the main female character. 

New to me or rewatch- new

Where did I watch it- I was meant to watch it in the wee hours of the morning of 1 November at the Halloween night special event I saw the last two films at but I was super tired so I headed home and watched it later in the day on SBS On Demand

-------------

So that is another year done. 

Best new to me film- As a film, Kwaidan. In terms of my favourites though, flip a coin between A Bay of Blood and House

Most fun new film- def House

Most OTT fun death- Piano in House. Honourable mention- train somersault in A Cat O' Nine Tails and woman thrown off building Child's Play and shower death in the remake of Slumber Party Massacre

Thing that most turned by stomach- closed over eyes in plane bathroom on Clayface (so tense and gross)

Best individual scene- every single scene in House

Biggest creep/scare factor- haunting stuff in A Tale of Two Sisters

I also did watch some horror TV which in summary this October/early November:

- Crystal Lake- please give Linda Cardellini all the awards. She is an exceptional Pamela Vorhees. I loved this series more than the other Friday the 13th content I've seen. It gives Pamela a backstory and some sympathetic traits without taking away that she is not mentally healthy. The kid who plays Jason is super cute and I did worry that it would make us like Jason too much but they legit kill him in the first episode. Also damn they got Hamish Linklater as Elias Vorhees... basically if that man is going to pop up in your genre content, that is a lock on things being exceptional for at least the episodes he is in. It does further mess with the already very messy timeline so great ready at the end of the last episode to be a bit "huh" about the timeline. If you want to watch it, it is on Stan.

- Carrie- OK so I have thoughts on it. I really liked the modernisation of the bullying and I thought the performances were really strong. I LOVE the number of women who directed episodes or contributed scripts (such a long way from the creepy male gaze of the opening scene of the film). I didn't love giving any of the bullying substance (you know what this is if you have seen it, it was just a plot that wasn't needed) and I also didn't love trying to make Margaret White or Chris Hargensen more than villains. Let your villains be villains and whist I was interested in some of what they did with Margaret White (I stress some of it), Chis is deeply horrid and giving her the family life this gives her just made her too sympathetic (or tried to- the construction site scene locked in my lack of love for her). Unlike others, I didn't hate some of the additions that will result in it having a second season especially as it appears they are Stephen King approved, but I do think it isn't new and I really want Mike Flanagan to just read The Power by Naomi Alderman (or he could watch the TV adaptation- I've not seen it as I didn't think it could have been as good as book) and realise he isn't doing something new. And yes I did feel ancient watching Stu Macher/Shaggy as the principal....but hey I want Matthew Lillard working always. It is on Amazon Prime if you want it.

- Agatha All Along- yep a rewatch. Love this series and I had no witches this October. On Disney+ obviously as it is MCU.

- True Blood- before this show got bonkers in the fifth season, it was one of my faves and being on Amazon Prime a lot for October meant that it got recommended to me (it is currently on there) and I started a rewatch of the sexy southern vampires. 

And to see us out... just have some of the bonkers images from House. I did want to match the title of go with Killer Klowns but I want you all to watch House (everyone do it!):

Psychedelic imagery from House (1977) : r/cinematography

Sunday, May 10, 2026

First third of 2026 old film retrospective

 So I am opting in 2026 to try and catch up on some old “must see” films in part inspired by the fact I needed to watch Breathless before I saw Nouvelle Vague (maybe I need one of my favourite directors to make films about the making of old films more often). The plan was to watch at least four “must see” older films a month. I also added to that in January maybe watching one campier cult film in the mix- mainly inspired by a film I saw was expiring soon on SBS on Demand that falls in this group in January. Now things like get chaotic with this plan as we are about to have some major nerd IP releases that might result in rewatches of those things (I suspect I won’t rewatch any Star Wars prior The Madalorian and Gorgu but I already started long haul prep for Avengers: Doomsday - I’m rewatching Agents of SHIELD (not that my hopes of it coming up in Doomsday are likely to be realised) and later in the year there will be many film rewatches coming). Anyhow , here is what I watched in January through April and my thoughts on them…

Breathless (or A bout de Souffle) (1960 France dir Jean-Luc Goddard)

Michael, a small time con man, accidentally shots a cop whilst fleeing from his latest con. He decides to flee the country and returns to Paris to get the funds for this and to convince his American journalism student girlfriend, Patricia, to come with him.

This was an interesting film to watch in 2026 for the first time. Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg are outstanding and so charismatic as Michael and Patricia. The film is beautifully shot and comes together seamlessly which is shocking when you see the backstory of how Goddard shot it (which is chronicled in Nouvelle Vague). I would deeply love someone to make me or point me in direction of where to buy the dress Seberg wears in the final scenes. This sounds like a rave but I will own that when I rated this on Letterboxd, I only gave it a 4.5 as I had to knock 0.5 off for the fact that the presentation of women is a mess and more than a wee bit sexist.

Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars

The Terminator (1984 US, dir James Cameron)

A young woman finds herself the target of a murderous cyborg sent from the dystopian future to kill her. She finds help from a young man who also travelled from the future who tells her that the cyborg is targeting her as her son will take down the robots in the future- the son she is yet to have.

Until this January, this was one of the two films I most often got lectured on not having seen (honestly it is second to the other film as every white man my age appears to be obsessed with the other one, Shawshank- I might get to it this year but TBH also might not just to be petty).  The Terminator of the two was the one I felt worse about not having seen as it does seem very much my jam with its cheesy 80s sci fi with a strong female protagonist vibes. I did love it and I will definitely make time for the sequel this year too. Great action, cheesy 80s effects, and quality synth music- yes to all of that. I also was lucky enough that a cinema near me did a screening of the 8mm of it in January so I even got to see it on the big screen. Also knew it was coming as a line in the movie, as like others I’ve heard it quoted even without seeing the film, but I think “come with me if you want to live” might be a better pick up line than any line in any rom com ever.

Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars (testament more to the vibes than the quality of the film)

Kiki’s Delivery Service (1989 Japan, dir Hayao Miyazaki)

When a young witch comes of age, she is required to send a year living independently. Kiki, therefore, leaves her village and goes with her cat to a larger town. She finds a home above a bakery and sets up a delivery business.

People are often surprised that there are Miyazaki films I’ve not seen and well now there are two less- I’m about to get to the second. I really enjoyed this. I thought it was a delightful coming of age story with kinds of questioning of identity that happens in adolescence occurring in the middle part of the film. Kiki as a heroine is one of the earliest of Miyazaki’s super independent young women (since many of his later films are marked by strong women especially one of my fave films of all time, Princess Mononoke) and she isn’t the only strong female character in the film, and it is delightful to see this presentation of a young woman coming in a film from the 1980s written and directed by man. I would definitely say if you have kids in your worlds that you should show them this especially young girls.

Clare’s ranking- 4.5 stars 

But I’m a Cheerleader… (1999 US dir Jamie Babbit)

Everyone in Megan’s life suspected she might be a lesbian even though she is a popular cheerleader at her school. Her parents and friends send her off to conversion therapy.

This was the film that made me add a more cult film to my mix of films each month. It has an opposite flavour to the only other film I’ve seen about conversion therapy, The Miseducation of Cameron Post (which remains one of the toughest films to watch that I’ve ever seen- really good film but also very tough watch and a much more realistic portrayal of the practice). I’m a huge fan of many people in this film and it has always been one I have considered watched. It is a camp ol’ time which gave a slight echo of John Waters at times. Ru Paul attempting to play straight- hilarious even if he really isn’t a great actor. I will say that as conversion therapy of this type did claim many young lives not 100% sure how I feel about making light of it. On another point, first film I have watched that is directed by a woman- sadly I have so far mainly watched male directed films.

Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars 

My Neighbour Totoro (1988 Japan, dir Hayao Miyazaki)

Two young girls move to a rundown house in the country with their father whilst their mother is in hospital ill. Soon they discover the surrounding forrest is full of spirits and in particular they befriend the totoros.

Second Miyazaki and the Miyazaki I’ve most been told off for not having seen in the past. Straight up adorable and the first film I’ve watched in this run that I gave five stars on Letterboxd. The animation is beautiful and there is something just delightfully wholesome about the whole thing. Again as with Kiki this is a great film for kids if you want them to get into anime.

Clare’s ranking- 5 stars

Ten Canoes (2006 Australia, dir Rolf de Heer and Peter Djigirr)

In a world removed from western influence, a narrator tells the story of a group of indigenous men preparing canoes for the hunting season. A young man is in love with one of his brother’s wives and an older men tells him the story of similar young man in the past.

I watched this film on 26 January and it was the perfect day to spend that day with a film that removes western impact from Australia’s indigenous community and instead telling its own indigenous morality tale. This is a beautiful film with the two timelines marked out by the colour palate- the past is in black and white, and the present in colour. It is also great to see a film that is in indigenous dialects- it is the Yolngu Matha language is Wikipedia is to be believed but various dialects of it (it was submitted for Best Foreign Language at the Oscars but didn’t get a nomination which is bonkers to be- should have been nominated- oddly also watched the film that won I also watched in this quarter). I have to say that the narration on this is one of the best I’ve ever heard-exceptional work by David Gulpilil. 

Clare’s ranking- 4 stars

The Red Shoes (1948 England, dir Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger)

A young ballerina finds herself caught between her relationship with a ballet composer and her passion for the dance that is also driven by the controlling director of her company.

It is weird to say that I’m not watched any Pressburger and Powell films because this run of films- now I have watched two and this was the first. This film is often cited by many directors as one of the best films ever made (Scorsese, Coppola (the older one), and Spielberg all say it is one of their favourites) and is given as an example of film that should have won best picture and didn’t (Olivier’s Hamlet bet it). This is a very close second favourite for me of the films I watched this quarter and I can say both feature amazing eye make up. It is an excellent basically perfect film about the arts ,and about women being told that they cannot choose a career and a relationship, and about men being controlling as all get out. The performance by Moira Shearer is amazing especially considering that this is her first film and also that she is a ballerina so all the dancing is her. Also me being me and loving a dance sequence, the 17 minute ballet sequence in this film AMAZING.

Clare ranking- 5 stars 

The Witches of Eastwick (1987 US, dir George Miller)

Three women, whose husbands aren’t in the picture (one divorced, one widowed, and one deserted by her husband but not divorced), don’t know that they are witches and don’t know that them meeting on the regularly has unknowingly made them a coven. A mysterious man arrives in town and tries to seduce all three women.

This had some camp appeal but it is the weakest film I’ve watched so far in my opinion. It is so 80s with the giant hair on women and so horny. The horniness is what tips it from campy to cringe at times. It is a bit disappointing that it isn’t better as the cast is stacked and George Miller is a capable director. Jack Nicholson does get to do some OTT scenery chomping which is fun and I particularly enjoyed Cher’s performance. The music is also good as it is John Williams- so odd that he did the music for a film like this. The big thing here is that the passing of 40 years have not been friendly to films of this type.

Clare’s ranking- 3 stars

All the President’s Men (1976 US, dir Alan J Pakula)

In the lead up to the 1972 election, two investigative reporters start to work on minor stories that link them to start to uncover a huge scandal for the Nixon administration. 

This film was exceptional. I do love a fast paced script driven drama and that is what this is. There is a some controversy about the script which makes me surprised at how good it ultimately is- the legend that William Goldman is listed as the writer but supposedly some involved didn’t love the original script and  Carl Bernstein punched it up with help of then girlfriend, Nora Ephron (yes the rom com writer/director) making Goldman not happy. The performances by Redford as Woodward and Hoffman as Bernstein are great. The film might completely fail the Bechdel test but otherwise great.

Clare’s ranking- 5 stars

Cabaret (1972 US, dir Bob Fosse)

In Weimar era Berlin, a young English man meets a free spirted young American cabaret performer, and the two form a friendship.

This film… what to say… it is EVERYTHING. I read the short stories it is partly based on years ago and even that didn’t prepare me for how much I would enjoy this. As someone who loves musicals, who loves strong female characters, who loves complex characters, and who loves diversity on screen, this is absolute perfection. This is my favourite film so far of everything I’ve watched and not just that but as soon as I saw it, I was like this might shoot up there to be one of my favourite films full stop.  The swirling camp of the cabaret headed with the exception performances of Joel Grey as the emcee, expertly balanced with the personal drama for Sally and Brian and the broader societal drama that is present throughout as the film hints at the looming threats to their life style that is the emergence of the Nazi party (some of which are quite confronting). This film is so progressive for the early 70s in that multiple characters are queer and there is a plot line about abortion, and it is wild that it even got made at that time. Much like Terminator, I lucked out with Cabaret and got to see it on the big screen due to a retrospective screening, and so happy again to get that chance.

Clare’s ranking- 5 stars and if I could give it more than 5/5 I would

The Talented Mr Ripley (1999 US, dir Anthony Minghella)

A wealthy older man plays a young man he believes was at college with his son to go to Italy and retrieve his son who is living there with his girlfriend. 

I knew the plot of this going in as I had been told and also I saw a play based partly on the book but also partly inspired by this film last year. I was unsure that I would buy Matt Damon as Ripley but somehow he makes it work and comes across as the right balance of at times naive and at others manipulative. Jude Law oozes charisma as Dicky even if his American accent does flatter at times. I also completely forgot Cate Blanchett was in this and always nice to have an Aussie pop up. The film looks beautiful which considering the setting of coastal Italy would be hard not to be. This is very well made so it does have some flaws.

Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars

In Bruges (2008 Ireland, dir Martin McDonagh)

Two hitmen are sent by their boss to spend downtime in Bruges after one of them makes an error on a job.

Many people told me to watch this as they think Irish black comedies with some violence are very much my vibe it seems. I definitely made a note to watch it after I saw McDonagh’s brilliant follow up with the same stars that was The Banshees of Inishireen (OK there are two other McDonagh films I’ve seen that came out between those two but I just really love Banshees- I prefer it to this even). This was so fun and I loved both Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson in it- whilst Gleeson is great in basically everything he is in, I do think there is something in Farrell that shines even brighter when he pairs with McDonagh. Also two films in a row that just make a part of Europe look great- even if in this case one of the characters is constantly complaining about how boring said part of Europe is.

Clare’s ranking- 4 stars 

Das Leben der Andern (or The Lives of Others) (2006 Germany, dir Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck)

In East Berlin in the mid 80s, a dedicated Stasi agent is tasked with surveilling a popular playwright and his actress partner even though there is no evidence initially that either is actively working against the Soviet leadership. 

This is an interesting film to watch in 2026 when the scent of authoritarianism is again in the wind in many countries and innocent citizens are again victim to this. It is interesting to balance out the fact that neither of the people being surveilled may have leant into support for the West if their fellow artists weren’t targeted- especially as the actress is sleeping with a politician to help her career even though she does love the playwright. The centre of the film though is the Stasi agent who is the ultimate company man until he starts for the sympathise with those he is observing. Ulrich Mühe is just exceptional as the Stasi agent and the film really belongs to him. I mentioned earlier that I watched Ten Canoes didn’t get nominated for Best Foreign Language film in its release year even though it submitted, this is the film that won that year.

Clare’s ranking- 4 stars

Misery (1990 US, dir Rob Reiner)

A famous romance writer has a car accident on a country road and is rescued by a local nurse who is his self-declared biggest fan.

I have been trying to avoid horror so as I will certainly watch some classic horror films in October but I failed at avoiding them just a tad. Second William Goldman script of the quarter and as my last October viewings showed I don’t hate a film based on a Stephen King novel (unless it is the most recent version of Salem’s Lot and yes I know my not having seen Shawshank also is contrary to that statement but I’m definitely more of a horror person than a prison film person). I did know what to expect going in as if you like horror at all, people tend to spoil the plot of King content. It is interesting as a reflection of King’s personal experience as he wrote this in response to his real life experiences in the late 80s- not the buckets of cocaine he was on, but more the fact that he started trying his hand at not horror and his fans came for him (though not as violent as happens here). Kathy Bates is perfectly unhinged as Annie Wilkes and the film belongs to her even though she was the less known of the leads- James Caan is solid, but Bates just steals the show.

Clare’s ranking- 3.5 stars

Black Narcissus (1947 UK, dir Emeric Pressburger and Michael Powell)

A group of nuns are sent to a remote village in the Himalayas, and seek to run the local school and hospital even though the locals only welcome them as they have been told to by the local general.

As I said I watched two Pressburger and Powell films this quarter and this was the second. Whilst a good film, this is also an interesting relic of the 1940s as you would never see a film about the English occupation of India played this way nowadays. The film itself is beautifully made especially the exceptional painted backgrounds which are lovely- it was completely filmed in Pinewood Studios in the UK and the backgrounds are used to convey depth as well as location. Deborah Kerr is outstanding as the young woman who is suddenly put in the position of leading this group of nuns. The ways the nuns start to question their beliefs as they interact with the locals and with a government agent in the region really starts to show or at least to hint towards the idea that colonialism might not be a wise idea. The film is also very horny for a film about nuns- well 1940s horny when it comes to two of the nuns (Kerry’s character and a second who becomes completely obsessed with him) interact with the government agent. I enjoyed it especially as the nuns unravel as the film goes on but there are many elements that have not aged well- is that a hint of the “exotic” East corrupting the “pure” West? Yes it is. Is that a cultural stereotype that isn’t flattering? Yes it is. Worst of all, is that brown face casting? Yes with the exception of one character all the featured Indian characters are played by white people.

Clare’s ranking- 4 stars (though with the strong warnings about the poorly aged cultural representation)

 Predator (1987 US, dir John McTiernan)

A team of commandos is sent into the jungle of somewhere in Central or South America to investigate a possible arms deal only to find there is something more dangerous hunting them.

That is right I have watched two Arnie classics since the beginning of the year and yes again did tip into the world of horror (since this has horror elements even if it is mainly sci fi action). John McTiernan directed what I believe to be the best action film ever made, Die Hard, so I had high hopes for the action sequences in this and boy did they deliver. Is a lot of this film very silly especially when compared to how smart the other Arnie action film I watched this year was? Damn right it is. At the same time, is this film a good time? Damn right it is. Arnie def should be dead in a world where science works but a lot of fun regardless. Also did love as an Arrested Development fan to see where the Carl Weathers clips in it came from. I want to see some of the more recent Predator content eventually as it ties in with the Alien world- I mean the super recent stuff not Alien vs Predator as I’ve already seen the first of those and it is bad- so I might need to keep going with these but I do hear that this films generally are more dumb, bad fun than actually good. To confirm this was my more cult thing for April having skipped doing one of those in March.

Clare’s ranking- 3 stars

The Lady Vanishes (1938 UK, dir Alfred Hitchcock)

A young woman is on a train travelling back to England to reunite with her fiancé after a trip to Europe. She meets an older woman on the train but then the older woman disappears and everyone else on the train claims she never existed except one guy who offers to help her out.

Got to love some gaslighting- so much gaslighting. It is worrying how many old films that is the premise of.  I do like a story set on a train as you are moving but at the same time stuck so for something like this, you have a set group of people to interview about this disappearing woman but you are still travelling. You know you are in safe hands with anything Hitchcock directed- he was a not great human but he was talented director and no getting around that- and I will even fight for some of the ones that others aren’t fans of. The film is very tense and it is excellent that even though there is a lot of gaslighting that there is one person who sides with the protagonist so she isn’t just treated as if she is going crazy. It is also at times a lot of fun with the some comedy from the supporting characters including what is a barely coded gay couple who are obsessed with cricket (they legit share a bed and a pair of PJs- good thing Hitchcock was in the UK at this point as no way this would have got through in the code era US). I do love a bit of early Hitchcock and when he dips his toes into something not thriller or horror as he does with the supporting characters here.

Clare’s ranking- 4 stars 

So that is my older films to date this year- well until April, I just watched my first one for May. I’m going to keep powering through looking for more films I have managed to miss this year and continue to hope for more random big screen viewings as I got for a couple of these.

Saturday, February 7, 2026

Oscar predictions 2025

 It has been a two years since I’ve done this but let’s try my luck again. This year oddly there are in most categories a lot of things I agree with so it will be less contentious than previous rounds of predictions. Importantly, just flagging up top how awesome it is that the film that now holds the record for most nominations is a horror film about people of colour directed by a black director- so happy for Sinners even if I think its wins will mainly come in the the technical categories.

I’m not going to predict the docos, shorts, or animated films as I’ve not seen enough of them. I do think the one animated nominee I’ve seen has a lock on the award though (yes K-Pop Demon Hunters is the only animated nominee I’ve seen).

If you want my speed points, I would have liked less nominees from sports (or IMHO “sports” as motor racing is not a sport) films and more love for Korean paper workers and films directed by Richard Linklater. Though if you read details I have thoughts on best actor…tin foil hat style thoughts.

In detail predictions:

Best Picture

Nominees- Bugonia, F1, Frankenstein, Hamnet, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, The Secret Agent, Sentimental Value, and Train Dreams

Shouldn’t be nominated in my opinion- both sport films. I’ve not seen nor do I plan on seeing F1, but unpopular opinion I nearly fell sleep in Marty Supreme

Should be nominated but isn’t- No Other Choice,  and It was just an Accident. Also these are outliers as they didn’t get heaps of nominations elsewhere but I would have liked to see Sorry, Baby, Nouvelle Vague, and The Mastermind get nominations.

What I’d like to win- honestly remove the sports films and most of these I’m OK with. I personally would love a Hamnet or Sinners win

What will win- Either One Battle After Another or Hamnet. I suspect one takes this and the other takes director and I would hazard this will go to One Battle After Another and Chloe Zhao will win for directing Hamnet

Best Director

Nominees- Chloe Zhao for Hamnet, Josh Safdie for Marty Supreme, Paul Thomas Anderson for One Battle After Another, Joachim Trier for Sentimental Value, and Ryan Coogler for Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated in my opinion- Josh Safdie

Should be nominated but isn’t- Richard Linklater for either Blue Moon or Nouvelle Vague, and Park Chan-wook for No Other Choice. I may be biased as these two have been two of my favourite directors for a long while but it is bonkers to me that Park is yet to get a directing nom at the Oscars, and that Linklater is yet to win and with two Linklater films this year, it would have been the perfect time to make up for not awarding him for Boyhood.

What I’d like to win- again remove the sports film and any of these are fine. I would say I would most like Zhao or Coogler to win.

What will win- As mentioned I suspect they will split director and best film between One Battle After Another and Hamnet, and I do suspect this will go to Zhao.

Best Actor in a Leading Role

Nominees- Timothee Chalamet for Marty Supreme, Leonardo DiCaprio for One Battle After Another, Ethan Hawke for Blue Moon, Michael B. Jordan for Sinners, and Wagner Moura for The Secret Agent

Shouldn’t be nominated in my opinion- Chalamet

Should be nominated but isn’t- I call conspiracy! I see you Oscars and you setting up to award this to the person who I think shouldn’t be nominated. It is beyond insane that Paul Mescal is not nominated for Hamnet and I cannot not see this as the Academy removing the strongest contender for the type of role it likes to award (since it isn’t big on awarded foreign language films in this category or people of colour or people called DiCaprio, and though I think Hawke is amazing in Blue Moon it hasn’t win any lead up awards) from the mix. Though removing the tin foil hat, a friend did suggest that maybe the studio for Hamnet put Mescal up for supporting which is bonkers in IMHO but it is a tighter category which might explain him missing out.

I would also would have loved nominations for Jesse Plemons for Bugonia,  Joel Edgerton for Train Dreams, Guillaume Marbeck for Nouvelle Vague, Josh O’Connor for The Mastermind, and Lee Byung-hun for No Other Choice

Who I’d like to win- I would love the Oscars to go against type and award Moura. That said again sport film aside, fine with any of these winning

Who will win- Chalamet

Best Actress in a Leading Role

Nominees- Jessie Buckley for Hamnet, Rose Byrne for If I Had Legs I’d Kick You, Kate Hudson for Song Sung Blue, Renate Reinsve for Sentimental Value, and Emma Stone for Bugonia

Shouldn’t be nominated in my opinion- oddly no-one, I have someone I would add in but largely this is a solid group of nominees

Should be nominated but isn’t- Eva Victor for Sorry, Baby 

Who I’d like to win- Rose Byrne. I think all of these performances are great and I know she isn’t likely to win but this performance was a revelation and Byrne deserves her flowers.

Who will win- Buckley which honestly I’m not bummed about but I just thought Byrne was a tiny bit better.

Best Actor in a Supporting Role

Nominees- Benicio del Toro for One Battle After Another, Jacob Elordi in Frankenstein, Delroy Lindo in Sinners, Sean Penn for One Battle After Another, and Stellan Skarsgard for Sentimental Value

Shouldn’t be nominated in my opinion- again no-one. These were all good.

Should be nominated but isn’t- I would have been here for more Sinners noms in this category namely Miles Caton and Jack O’Connell. Also Andrew Scott for Blue Moon 

Who I’d like to win- Jacob Elordi- I have waited so long for a decent Frankenstein adaptation and Elordi was amazing as the monster. I know between this and best actress I seem to be backing Aussies but I do think both Byrne and Elordi were outstanding beyond me being biased by patriotism.

Who will win- Skarsgard and again I’m OK with this- I’m OK with any of these nominees winning, I would just like Elordi to.

Best Actress in a Supporting Role

Nominees- Elle Fanning for Sentimental Value, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleeaas for Sentimental Value, Amy Madigan for Weapons, Wunmi Mosaku for Sinners, and Teyana Taylor for One Battle After Another

Shouldn’t be nominated- once again no-one, Except for the lead actor category, I have no qualms with the acting noms

Should be nominated but isn’t- Zoey Deutch for Nouvelle Vague, Margaret Qualley for Blue Moon, and Hailee Steinfeld for Sinners

Who I’d like to see win- Madigan as I live for Gladys

Who will win- Madigan- with all the horror noms in the non technical categories, they need to award one somewhere I suspect this is where.

Best Original Screenplay

Nominees- Blue Moon, It was Just an Accident, Marty Supreme, Sentimental Value, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- Marty Supreme

Should be nominated but isn’t- Sorry Baby

What I’d like to see win- Sinners or Blue Moon

What will win- actually not sure- I think the bigger screenplay fight this year is in the adapted category. I suspect they might award Marty Supreme

Best Adapted Screenplay

Nominees- Bugonia, Frankenstein, Hamnet, One Battle After Another, and Train Dreams

Shouldn’t be nominated- it was a year for excellent adapted screenplays and I have no qualms with any of these nominees

Should be nominated but isn’t- No Other Choice

What I’d like to see win- One Battle After Another

What will win- One Battle After Another 

Best International Film

Nominees- It was just an Accident, The Secret Agent, Sentimental Value, Sirat, and The Voices of Hind Rajab

Shouldn’t be nominated- I cannot speak for two of them as I’ve not seen them (super keen for Sirat which is out in Australia soon) but generally fine with these

Should be nominated but isn’t- you can likely guess as I’ve mentioned it in a lot of categories… No Other Choice

What I’d like to see win- Sentimental Value

What will win- I think it will come down to the acting categories if the male acting categories go to The Secret Agent and Sentimental Value, this will go to It was just an Accident. It is a battle between those three and I suspect that it will be It Was Just An Accident as the other two though brilliant do strongly hang on the performances.

Best Music (Score)

Nominees- Bugonia, Frankenstein, Hamnet, One Battle After Another, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- none of these- there is a clear should win here and it is nominated so the other nominees don’t matter

Should be nominated but isn’t- see last comment

What I’d like to see win- it will be flat bonkers if this goes to anyone other than Ludwig Goransson for Sinners- it is not just the best music in a film in the window for these nominees but also one of the best for the last five years to a decade- along with every other Goransson score.

What will win- Sinners- unless the voters are high

Best Music (Original Song)

Nominees- “Dear Me” from Diana Warren: Relentless, “Golden” from K-Pop Demon Hunters, “I Lied to You” from Sinners, “Sweet Dreams of Joy” from Viva Verdi!, and “Train Dreams” from Train Dreams

Shouldn’t be nominated- I’m happy with the three songs from films I’ve seen being nominated- don’t know the other two so cannot comment

Should be nominated but isn’t- I wasn’t a fan of the second Wicked film (it should have been a single film) but I did think “Girl in the Bubble” should have got a look in here as it was a lovely song that Ariana Grande performed well that fit seamlessly into the existing vibe of Wicked

What I’d like to see win- I love “I Lied to You” and if it weren’t up against a juggernaut, it would have won but I suspect they will award the more popular song

What will win- “Golden”- I don’t hate this as it is a great song but I just like “I Lied to You” more (bonkers that the Nick Cave fan in me isn’t saying “Train Dreams” should or will win)

Best Casting

Nominees- Hamnet, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, The Secret Agent, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- this is predictable but Marty Supreme, I don’t think it should be nominated in any category

Should be nominated but isn’t- Sentimental Value (with four acting noms HOW is it not nominated- seriously it tied with Sinners for the most acting noms), Blue Moon, and Frankenstein

What I’d like to see win- One Battle After Another or Sinners

What will win- I suspect the Academy might be on the same page as me with this one- One Battle After Another or Sinners

Best Sound

Nominees- F1, Frankenstein, One Battle After Another, Sinners, or Sirat

Shouldn’t be nominated- Since I’ve not seen F1 or Sirat, I think all of these are fine as a car film needs to have good sound editing  (so I will let the “sport” film through)

Should be nominated but isn’t- I don’t have a film this year that blew me away from a sound editing POV so don’t have anything to add

What I’d like to see win- Sirat- I’m just going off trailers but the use of sound looks excellent. Otherwise Sinners

What will win- F1 (they nominated it in a few categories and they might just award it here) or Sinners

Best Production Design

Nominees- Frankenstein, Hamnet, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- Marty Supreme

Should be nominated but isn’t- The Secret Agent

What I’d like to see win- Frankenstein or Sinners

What will win-  Sinners or Hamnet

Best Cinematography

Nominees- Frankenstein, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, Sinners, and Train Dreams

Shouldn’t be nominated- Marty Supreme

Should be nominated but isn’t- No Other Choice 

What I’d like to see win- Sinners

What will win- Sinners 

Best Make Up and Hair

Nominees- Frankenstein, Kokuho, Sinners, The Smashing Machine, and The Ugly Stepsister

Shouldn’t be nominated- I’ve not seen three of these so cannot make a call on this

Should be nominated but isn’t- again no strong thoughts as there is a clear winner I think

What I’d like to see win- Frankenstein

What will win- Frankenstein

Best Costume Design

Nominees- Avatar: Fire and Ash, Frankenstein, Hamnet, Marty Supreme, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- no blue cat people should be nominated for any category ever (urgh Avatar just no). I will be nice and say that Marty Supreme is fine here just for Gwyneth Paltrow

Should be nominated but isn’t- Fantastic Four: First Steps - I love me some retro-futurism and some 60s fashion. Also Song Sung Blue for its chaotic 90s fashions

What I’d like to see win- Sinners

What will win- Sinners or maybe Frankenstein

Best Film Editing

Nominees- F1, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, Sentimental Value, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- Marty Supreme and likely F1

Should be nominated but isn’t- It was just an Accident and Nouvelle Vague

What I’d like to see win- Sinners

What will win- Sinners or maybe One Battle After Another

Best Visual Effects

Nominees- Avatar: Fire and Ash, F1, Jurassic World Rebirth, The Lost Bus, and Sinners

Shouldn’t be nominated- most of the nominees. It is bonkers that Jurassic World Rebirth is Oscar nominated, but aside from that anything that isn’t Sinners should not be nominated with the possible exception of The Lost Bus which I’ve not seen

Should be nominated but isn’t- Superman, Fantastic Four: First Steps, Thunderbolts, and Frankenstein- seriously did the Academy forget that we had THREE good comic book films this year.

What I’d like to see win- this category’s nominees just mean that there is only one answer here and that is Sinners

What will win- for the above reason, Sinners

——-

And there you have it, my predictions. We will see how I go come Oscars night but with the exception of two or three categories, I don’t think I disagree with the Academy too much this year- which either scares me a tad or means they are starting to see sense.

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Films of 2025

The year has changed so time for the best films of the previous year list. According to Letterboxd I watched 132 films in 2025. Deducting my last 2024 film which I watched on New Years last year and the many older films I watched for the first time or rewatched (esp in October) and adding the eight 2025 films I’ve watched in the last three days I think I likely saw around 70-80 films in 2025 (plus the last few days) that were 2025 films. I have seen basically everything that is up for major awards to date that came out in 2025- either for normal release or at the Sydney Film Festival. As always it is worth noting some big award contenders will be 2026 releases in Australia (I already have my tickets for what are early screenings of Hamnet and No Other Choice next week- both aren’t actually out until the middle of the month).

So here we go:

5. One Battle After Another


Pat Calhoun (Leonardo Di Caprio) and his partner Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) are members of the French 75, a militant left wing group. When attacking a military base that is stopping people at the US/Mexico border, Perfidia dominates Colonel Steven Lockjaw (Sean Penn) and he becomes obsessed with her and they start a slightly twisted relationship. Perfidia gets pregnant and she is not really interested in the baby. Colonel Lockjaw captures her and she names names of member of the group. She then escapes, leaving her baby with Pat. Skip forward around 16 years, Pat now goes by Bob Ferguson and he is raising Charlene (Chase Infiniti), now going by Wilia, as his daughter. Colonel Lockjaw is now trying to get in good with a white supremacist group and he is both still obsessed with Perfidia and also worried about the group discovering his relationship with her including that Wilia might be his daughter. Lockjaw figures out where Bob and Wilia are, and he starts to come for them.

I think for a lot of people will have this as their film of the year, and I think it will be a head to head between it and Hamnet for most major awards. I didn’t jump to see it as I think the trailer made it look like something it isn’t. It is very quirky and very funny, and I don’t think the trailer sells that well. The three hour run time also turned me off- I do love some Paul Thomas Anderson films but the length of his films at times turns me off. After hearing the buzz and people saying it was funny, I figured that the trailer might have undersold it and that the length might not be a deal breaker. The films above this resonated with me more but this is an exceptionally well made film with great performances and a very smart and funny script. Definitely say just give it a go and don’t let the trailer sway you.

Where to see it- Max or I think still in some cinemas

4. Sentimental Value

Nora Borg (Renate Reinsve) is an actress for a theatre company in Oslo. She is suffering from some anxiety, and she and her sister, Agnes (Inga Idsdotter Lilieaas), are dealing with the death of their mother. Their father, Gustav (Stellan Skarsgard), arrives for the funeral of his ex wife much to Nora’s annoyance. Gustav is a film writer/director who used both of his daughters as child actors in his films. As adults, both women have complex relationships with their father- Agnes working an historian and researcher for her father, and Nora does not speak to him much and knows that he has shown up and left during some of her plays (he claims to hate theatre). Gustav has written a script for Nora to star in and he offers her the role but she immediately turns it down. Gustav heads to a film festival in France that is doing a retrospective of his films and meets actress Rachel Kemp (Elle Fanning), an American actress, who he casts in the role he wrote for Nora. Nora and Agnes are also struggling with the fact that the house they grew up in (even after their father left) belongs to their father and he is planning to use it to film his new film and then may sell it now their mother has passed away.

A few years ago, I loved Joachim Trier’s last film, The Worst Person in the World , which was anchored by an exceptional performances by Renate Reinsve- had I written a top five in 2021, it would have featured. With the same combo of lead actress and director, this film had high expectations from me and it met them. The four lead performances are outstanding especially Reinsve, and it is not shocking that they are up for awards. The mediation of the borders between artistic expression and emotional processing is front and centre as not only is there the blurrying of Gustav’s relationship with Rachel as him idealising his relationship with Nora, but also the fact his film is inspired by real family tragedies. There is also the interesting way in which the living spaces take on the personalities as the film starts and at times returns to narration about the house in which most of the film takes place, and the house is very much the fifth lead character. I particularly found the character of Agnes fascinating (though Reinsve’s is the best performance, Idsdotter Lilieaas’s is nearly as good) as the straight person to a family of creatives and the burdens she has to take on due to that. 

Where to see it- currently in cinemas

3. Sinners


In the Jim Crow south, the young black son of a preacher, Sammie (Miles Caton), is recruited by his cousins, Smoke and Stack (both Michael B Jordan) to help them set up a juke joint for the local black community. Smoke and Stack are WWI veterans who have spent years working various mobsters in Chicago and have returned to the South as Chicago is now unsafe for them and they have money for their juke joint. Sammie is a talented musician and the twins are keen for him to play for them. During the day, Smoke and Stack travel the town recruiting local harmonica player Delta Slim (Delroy Lindo), bouncer Cornbread (Omar Benson Miller), cook and hoodoo practitioner and Smoke’s entangled wife Annie (Wunmi Mosaku), and shop owners Grace and Bo Chow (Li Jun Li and Yao) to help with the opening night. Stack also runs into his ex-girlfriend, Mary (Hailee Steinfeld), who is often mistaken for white and lives as such even though she is partly black and therefore no more at home in the Jim Crow South than the other characters, and Sammie meets Pearline (Jayme Lawson), a singer he becomes infatuated with. When night arrives, the juke joint is buzzing with Delta Slim and Pearline both taking the stage. Then Sammie takes the stage and his performance pierces the veil of reality, and other performers are drawn from the past and the future into his song. Also drawn by his song though are the forces of evil and Remmick (Jack O’Connell) an Irish vampire and two locals (who are former KKK members) who he has turned show up at the juke joint and offer to pay with money and a song to enter the juke.

Vampires, Ryan Coogler, two Michael B Jordans… so much yes. Aside from superhero films, this was my anticipated film of 2025 and it definitely delivered. I don’t even know where to start with the things I loved here. As I love beautiful cinematography, I will start there. I never got to an iMax screening of the film even though I wanted to, but you want tell the effort that was put into how this film looked. It is a beautiful film Even just the scenes at the train station or in the town it looks meticulously constructed. Moving on the performances, Michael B Jordan is exceptional and you really feel like the twins are two people not one actor wearing different hats. Then the supporting performances also brilliant especially Wunmi Mosaku, Delroy Lindo, Jack O’Connell (very keen for him in 28 Years Later: Bone Temple in a few weeks), and Hailee Steinfeld (I have mainly seen her in teen roles or Marvel roles, and I think Mary was an excellent turn from her). And you have noticed I left off the second lead (aside from Michael B Jordan times two) and that is because of what a revelation as both an actor and singer Miles Caton is. This is Miles Caton’s first major role and he holds his own with a perfect level of naivety against Jordan and Lindo which is a feat. Now the concept, I loved the idea of music connecting through times and to the supernatural (if Coogler wanted to make further films with this idea underlying it with different supernatural creatures I would be there for it), and also the way that Coogler creates complex villains to touch on the complexities of race and colonialism- from Killmonger’s experience as a black man in America in Black Panther, to Namor as a person from another group of colonised people who is pitted against the inhibits of Wakanda in Wakanda Forever, to Remmick’s Irish identity here and that experience of being a colonised and persecuted group. And now to the logical final point, the music… damn the music. The intersection of the blues of the Black characters and the folk of Remmick with the beautiful score from Ludwig Goransson just sublime. As much as I love me some “Golden”, I think sadly for K-Pop Demon Hunters all the music and song related awards of the upcoming award season are going to Sinners and the beautiful song, “I Lied to You”. 

Where to watch- Max

2. Sorry, Baby


Agnes (Eva Victor) is an English literature academic at a small New England college. She lives in a remote cottage and is clearly trying to isolate herself from society. She is visited by her friend and former housemate Lydie (Naomi Ackie), and they have others who did their doctoral study around for dinner. One of them mentions that Agnes has just got a full time professorship and occupies the office of their former adviser on campus. Lydie’s reaction shows that there is something less than ideal about this set up. Circle back to a few years earlier, Agnes and Lydie are doctoral students. Their adviser is clearly showing favouritism to particular grad students, and Lydie jokes that he appears to be attracted to Agnes. When Agnes goes to their adviser’s house to get notes on her thesis, he rapes her. She returns home and tells Lydie who comforts her, and takes her to the doctor the next morning when they also discover that the adviser has quit his job and left the college, and when Agnes tells the college about what happens they tell her that they cannot do anything about it as he no longer works there. The film then cuts between the next few years of Agnes’s life as she deals with the aftermath of the rape and the way society isn’t built to support the survivors of rape.

It may shock you based on the above that this film is actually a comedy.That said it is very black comedy. As someone who works at a University, it has been interesting to watch over the last few years as in tge aftermath of MeToo, Universities have attempted to deal with the fact that they are the sites of a substantial amount of sexual assault. This film doesn’t steer clear of the horrors of the actual rape or the long term mental health impacts of it. It is the feat of a brilliant script by first director, Eva Victor (that is right the same person is the writer, director, and star here), that finds empathy and dark humour in pain. This script is in my opinion the strongest of 2025 and Victor who is tasked with carrying most of the film delivers it perfectly. The film will break your heart but also make you laugh to remedy that pain.

Where to watch- rentable on Amazon Prime and Apple TV

1. The Last Showgirl

Shelly (Pamela Anderson) is a showgirl at a club on the Vegas strip. She is in her late 50s and has worked there since her teens. She acts as a mother figure to the younger girls in the show (Kiernan Shipka and Brenda Song), and her closest relationships are with the stage manager at the show (Dave Bautista) and a former dancer from the show who is now a cocktail waitress (Jamie Lee Curtis). Eddie, the stage manager, tells the showgirls that the club will be closing their show and replacing it with a circus performance as people don’t see old style showgirl shows anymore. The younger dancers start auditioning for more risqué shows at other clubs but that is not an option for Shelly and also Shelly doesn’t want to perform in anything she thinks is too raunchy. With no funds for retirement and no good prospects for further employment, Shelly reaches out to her college student daughter, Hannah (Billy Lourd), from whom she is estranged to a degree due to the fact Shelly worked through Hannah’s childhood, often forgets details about Hannah and her life, and has never told Hannah who her father is. Hannah sees one of Shelly’s shows and tells her that she finds the show vulgar and hates that her mother wasted her life on this instead of raising her daughter or getting a normal job. Shelly is shaken by Hannah’s comments and when the younger dancers refuse to help her get ready the next night leading to her missing her cue and tearing her costume, she breaks down in tears.

A classic case of film that was a 2024 film in most of the world but was a late February 2025 release in Australia. This film… it was beautiful and I adored it. I couldn’t even put my finger on why but with its reflection on aging, and the valuing of women’s bodies, it just stayed with me all year and even though most people would say the four films I listed above are better films, I just couldn’t get past the impact of this one. It looks beautiful and the performances across the board are great, but that said this film belongs to Pamela Anderson. It isn’t just that as a woman who was treated as men in the 90s as an idealised sexualised version of womanhood she is perfect casting as Shelly, it is more than that. The performance is fragile, it is tender, and shows the world that it has for decades undervalued Anderson’s skill as an actor- it is in short a revelation. I think I felt every emotion as I watched this and it just a deeply understatedly beautiful film.

Where to watch it- Stan

There you have it my top five for 2025. The number 1 will be controversial take in some people’s opinions  but I stand by it.

Honourable mentions- Conclave, Mickey 17, The Mastermind, The Life of Chuck,  It was just an accident, Superman, Fantastic Four: First Steps, If I had Legs I’d Kick You, and Bugonia 

Best “fun” films- the two superhero films mentioned in my honourable mentions- I watched both of them twice this year (also watch Sinners and Conclave twice- though the latter mainly as the Pope died). Also because I love all films in this series, Wake Up Dead Man.

Best Australian film- I only watched a small number (three I think) and most of them were horror, I will say Together

Best individual scene in a film- the final chase scene in Weapons- never heard an audience laugh so hard. Honourable mention to the dance scene in Life of Chuck

Best documentary- Dahomey with an honourable mention to Mistress Dispeller

Best new to me but not new film- Perfect Blue (only film I gave five stars on Letterboxd this year). Honourable mentions of Pearl and Diabolique

A shoutout for the best performances of the year:

- Ralph Fiennes in Conclave

- Sophie Thatcher in Companion 

- Monica Barbaro in A Complete Unknown

- Fernanda Torres in I’m Still Here

- Pamela Anderson in The Last Showgirl

- Micheal B Jordan, Miles Caton, and Delroy Lindo in Sinners

- Ethan Hawke in Blue Moon

- Alfie Williams in 28 Years Later (outstanding child actor work)

- David Corenswet in Superman

- Jacob Elordi in  Frankenstein

- Renate Reinsve in Sentimental Value

- Adam Sandler in Jay Kelly

- Joel Edgerton in Train Dreams

- Emma Stone and Jesse Plemons in Bugonia

- Eva Victor in Sorry, Baby

- Rose Byrne in If I Had Legs, I’d Kick You (I know Jessie Buckley is meant to be amazing in Hamnet but honestly it will be bonkers if Byrne doesn’t get HEAPS of awards for this performance) 

That said actor having the best year for the second year in a row, Josh O’Connor with The Mastermind, Wake Up Dead Man and The History of Sound. The run this actor is having is next level and it just keeps going. I didn’t love The History of Sound as a whole but his performance was great (if it had stayed with two closeted men collecting folk music in the mid 20th century, I think others would have had bigger pacing issues than they did but I would have been super happy as it is the bit that worked best for me), and then him The Mastermind and Wake Up Dead Man just excellence.

And time for the worst film of the year which was actually quite a difficult decision this year. I had to weigh up which was worse a film that was on the merits of film deeply bad or a film that made me immensely angry despite having some artistic merit. Lucky for The Minecraft Movie (gosh that sucked), I couldn’t get past my anger and that meant the worst of the film was in my opinion, After the Hunt. Now this film had so much talent involved and Julia Roberts’s performance was solid, but it is so irresponsible to be borderline dangerous in my opinion and in the current climate just left me nauseated with rage. Interesting to see a through line between my second best film and my worst as both are about sexual assault on a University campus. This film borderline says that privilege justifies being assaulted (that the character who may have been assaulted was somewhat “asking for it” due to her privilege), that DEI practices are ruining academia (yes the victim is a black queer woman), that victim blaming is fine, and that people can justify statutory rape. Having worked for two decades in tertiary education, I could not be angrier. Academia is still run by white straight men and there are cases at every university of academics abusing their power over students especially young women, and anything that suggests otherwise is abhorrent to me. I know filmmakers and actors feel the need to make something that doesn’t anger the current US administration from time to time, but it is dangerous to put these ideas out there and I hope the people involved in this film (who as I say I normally like the work of) don’t repeat this. Also the script was supposedly on the Black List (the list of most liked but yet to be produce screenplays in Hollywood) and I have to say how as the above not withstanding, it isn’t a good script.

Now as an added thing, at speed my TV shows of 2025:

- Best new show- The Pitt with honourable mentions to Pluribus, It: Welcome to Derry, and Celebrity Traitors: UK (not sure that counts as new as it is a new version of an existing show)

- Best continuing show- Andor (DAMN season 2 was great) with honourable mentions to Severance and Gen V

- Things leaving our screens too soon- Mythic Quest (I didn’t love the cliffhanger that they then had to edit out but still I loved the show) and JLP as host of Australian Survivor

And that is it for Clare’s bests of 2025….