Sunday, March 4, 2018

2017 film times

Intro caveat...I started writing this the first week in January which explains why it sounds like it was written much earlier than mid March and also explains why one film was included (you'll understand when you get to it). I'm normally so much earlier than the Oscars and now I'm finishing this on Oscars' day.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Happy New Year! And once again it is time for my annual list of the top 15 films and bottom one of the past year.

Once again, this is based on having seen 70 or so films (at least I don't have a clean list) including not one but two film festivals (Sydney and Inverness). As always the guiding principle is that the film was released in the city I was in at the time between 1 January and 31 December of the year in question or screened at a film festival I attended in that window. As always there are a few big "films of the year" style films that I missed- Dunkirk (not a huge epic war film person) and The Florida Project (which I just haven't got to yet) are the big ones so that is why they might be missing. There is also one film that was impacted by the rolling Hollywood sex assault revelations- it might have come in mid count down but instead it isn't appearing at all (thanks Kevin Spacey you have now ruined a film I had thoroughly enjoyed in Baby Driver (if you can listen to the soundtrack without thinking of the film, I would recommend that)....not to mention many other films and TV shows).

15 (tied). Logan and Wonder Woman 




From a comic book movie point of view, there have been some big stand outs in 2017 and these two I couldn't separate for spot 15 (and they aren't alone on the countdown). 

So to start with Logan. This will be the last X-Men film made by Fox as the ownership is now with the Marvel Studios arm of Disney (which makes me pretty excited for possible future films) and it will also be the last film with Hugh Jackman as Wolverine (which is a little sad). Based loosely on the plot from the comic series, Old Man Logan, the film depicts a Wolverine who cannot heal himself and whose aging process has kicked into gear again. It is 2029 and no mutants have been born for 25 years and the powers of the small number of remaining mutants are playing up. Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) is working as a limo driver in Texas by day and at night, he drives across the Mexican border where he and Caliban (Stephen Merchant) are caring for Professor X (Patrick Stewart). Professor X has developed a brain disorder that means he cannot control his psychic connections and he has seizures that have killed people including some of the other remaining mutants. Wolverine is recruited for a limo driving job that turns out to be a former nurse for the scientific corporation that has been working with the government to clone mutants as soldiers. The nurse has smuggled a young mutant clone out of the facility where they were being bred and it turns out that young mutant clone, Laura (Dafne Keen), has abilities much like Wolverine. The nurse is killed and cyber enhanced soldiers from the scientific corporation chase Wolverine and Laura to where Professor X is hidden, and that starts a cat and mouse game to get away from them. 

The film doesn't clearly state why there are no mutants being born and mutants are losing power as the X-Men films have never featured M-Day (I assume because Scarlet Witch is Marvel Studios property) but it seems something like that has occurred (for those not in the know, in the comics after some trauma that hopefully comes to the screen at some stage so no spoilers on that trauma, Scarlet Witch declares "No More Mutants" and her abilities make that a reality with no more mutants been born after that day which is termed "M-Day"). However that doesn't make the plot hard to follow so you just have to accept as fact that something odd has occurred since the last X-Men film. This is also the most violent X-Men film with the most adult language- Hugh Jackman supposedly took a pay cut to ensure that the film retained an R rating in the States. The violence works as it has always been odd that Wolverine was slashing at people with metal claws and yet there was limited blood in the previous films.  Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart continue to excel in the roles they have played for 17 years, and it will be very hard for Marvel Studios to redo the X-Men without them, especially without Jackman. Dafne Keen is a fine young actress and she plays the surly and often silent Laura amazingly. This is one of those comic book movies that stands on its own outside of the comic book genre as a mediation on aging and also on the persecution of outsiders in society (the latter always a theme in X-Men films). Also Logan is now the first comic film to be nominated in one of writing categories at the Oscars- previously comic films have only taken out one acting award (Heath Ledger as the Joker in Dark Knight which was arguably a posthumous award for his larger body of work...not to lessen the weight of that particular performance as it is amazing) and the technical categories.

On to Wonder Woman... after the events of Batman Vs Superman, Diana Prince (Gal Gadot) receives a photo from Bruce Wayne of herself during World War I with a group of men on the battlefield. She reflects on the past. Diana was raised on a hidden Greek island as an Amazon. The island populated only by women and Diana is the daughter of the queen of the Amazons. Diana is told the history of the Amazons including that Ares, the Greek God of War, is one of their great enemies and that Zeus has given the Amazons a "godkiller" to stop him should he raise again. A pilot, Steve Trevor (Chris Pine), crashes off the coast of the island, and is followed through the invisibility barrier that protects the island by German boats. The Germans fight the Amazons (Germans with bayonets and other guns, Amazons on horseback with swords, and bows and arrows) and Diana's aunt sacrifices herself to save Diana. When Diana interrogates Steve Trevor with the Amazons' lasso of truth, she finds out about the first world war and becomes convinced that Ares has risen up again to destroy the world. Steve Trevor is an Allied spy who has behind enemy lines and has stolen the lab book of a German scientist who is developing awful chemicals to cripple the Allies. Diana leaves the island with Steve Trevor taking the godkiller weapons with her in hopes of defeating Ares. When they arrive in London, Diana the warrior woman dressed in short armour comes face to face with 1910s society before she and Steve can head to the front.

I have heaped criticisms on the DC films of the last few years and trust me I'm not done, but this was a shock. The first comic book film with a female lead and a female director (it has already happened in the comic book TV space with Jessica Jones) is actually really good. When I was complaining about Batman Vs Superman, one of only good points of that film that I could see was the treatment of Wonder Woman and thankfully Zack Synder and others who have been behind the awful recent DC films appear to have had very limited creative input into this film (that said, Zack Synder is listed with a "Story by" credit which doesn't necessarily say much but he at least had ideas that went into the film). Gal Gadot continues to play Wonder Woman well and is strongly supported by Chris Pine, Robin Wright, David Thewlis, and the amazing Lucy Davis (an actress who should be in so many more things). I like that they have a female secondary villain in the German scientist and just that generally it is gives much a strong place to women in the comic book film space which is so male dominated. The racial diversity of Amazon Island (yes I know its name but you know the actors struggle with it enough) is also great and the Amazon fighting scenes at the beginning of the film amazing (Robin Wright is particularly great in those scenes). I do have a small issues with the ending- no spoilers as to what, ask me in person- and also with the film's tendency to overuse "mankind" when it means people as a whole (i.e. not just dudes) but I look forward to the sequel to Wonder Woman, even though the next DC film did go straight back to the awful space for me. I also LOVE that this is giving little girls a super hero to dress as. 

14. Wind River


From comic book movies to a film starring two actor who are best known nowadays for comic book movies... though this is much more serious fare. On the remote Wyoming Native American reservation Wild River, a Fish and Wildlife Services agent is pursuing a mountain lion. The agent, Cory Lambert (Jeremy Renner), does not find the lion but finds out in the bleak snow in the middle of nowhere the body of a young woman. The body is poorly attired for the snowy and freezing winter, and appears to have been sexually assaulted. The FBI is called and they send the nearest agent. The FBI agent, Jane Banner (Elizabeth Olsen), is herself very young and has next to no field experience. Banner quickly recruits Lambert to assist with the investigation as the area (which is huge) has next to no police force and Lambert knows both the land and the people of the reservation as his ex-wife's parents live there and he is friends with the father of the girl who was killed as she was the best friend of his daughter who was herself found dead in the snow a few years earlier. 

This is the third film in what some are terming a trilogy from writer Taylor Sheridan- following Sicario and Hell or High Water. I hadn't seen Hell or High Water when I wrote my 2016 best films list but after I saw it I felt it should have had a place, and I have not seen Sicario (though I know I should), but if the trilogy is in feel, then I can see the similarity between this and Hell or High Water as both operate in a vaguely Western space if a modern take on it. Hell or High Water and Wind River also share a musical sensibility as the music for both is the work of Nick Cave and Warren Ellis, and it works so well for this Western-isque space. Wind River is also Sheridan directorial debut and when you look at the film as a completed product that is quite the achievement on debut as there is little to fault here- he won an award for his direction when the film debuted at Cannes. The film is beautifully shot and is not overwritten allowing for appropriate silences and also for solid character development. I'm a big fan of Jeremy Renner and Elizabeth Olsen and not just because they are both Avengers but because they just have a great craft- Renner was in last year's countdown for Arrival and I'm not done with Olsen this year. I also thought Gil Birmingham was amazing as the father of the murdered girl- he was also great in Hell or High Water (another link between the two). 

One more reason this film is amazing is that it is seeking to draw attention to a massive issue in America, the fact that cases of missing persons involving Native American women (as the murdered girl is in the film is and Renner's character's daughter was also half Native American) are not well investigated, reported on, and even statistics on cases are limited. Hopefully this film helps turns the tide on that. The film should also be applauded because as a film partly about sexual assault, it actually took notice when the allegations started flying in Hollywood this year- it was originally distributed by the Weinstein Company and after the allegations against Harvey Weinstein, the filmmakers changed this and after that and for future distribution, it will now be distributed by Lionsgate. 

13. Call Me By Your Name



In 1983, 17 year old Elio (Timothée Chalamet) is lonely and disillusioned as he spends his biannual holiday in rural Italy with his parents (Michael Stuhlbarg and Amira Casar). Elio's father is an archaeology professor and each summer, he invites a graduate student to come to Italy and stay with the family and do research. As the film opens, Elio and a girl from the local village, Marzia, watch out the window as the grad student, Oliver (Armie Harmer), arrives. Elio spends the next weeks flirting with Marzia whilst also developing a friendship that clearly moves into crush territory and beyond with very American, very attractive Oliver (Elio is also American though he speaks Italian frequently so it becomes less obvious). Gradually Elio starts to develop more courage and actually shows his feelings for Oliver but Oliver is initially very cautious about reciprocating them.

This is based on a novel that I have not read though I may read it now as the film is languidly beautiful and I hear that is well translated from the novel. If this film had not had solid competition from another beautiful film with at times very similar themes, it would have maybe been higher up the list but the other film is my number three and I felt was of a higher quality- this may explain to some why it isn't as high up as others have ranked it, it is a question of release timing as the other film came out (pun not intended) in 2016 in many countries that weren't Australia. As I said, visually this film is stunning and I also loved the soundtrack which mixes classical (Elio is a music student) and 1980s tunes and Sufjan Stevens. I have not seen Timothée Chalamet in anything else so far as I can recall and there is something perfect about him as Elio. I was actually not sure that Elio was American as Chalamet's Italian is really solid- I was unsure where Elio was supposed to be from as everyone in the film seemed to speak Italian without strong accent except Oliver and Elio is not a common American first name though when Elio speaks English, he does have an American accent ( I had to check on wikipedia). The perfection of the casting is not just that Chalamet supposedly learnt that convincing Italian in a small window or his actually playing the piano or that he plays Elio's introversion and shyness and his emergent confidence so well, but the fact that as you can see in the film, whilst not conventionally attractive from a modern American standpoint (Harmer is that), Chalamet looks a little like a Roman bust of a young man so you can see in just his looks why an archaeology grad student like Oliver would be drawn to Elio. Harmer is an actor who I've been waiting to get a decent role since he guested on Veronica Mars many moons ago (the emergence of former Veronica Mars folks as powerhouses is going to come up again later) and a few years ago he starred in my guilty pleasure film of the year, The Man from U.N.C.L.E. - though I think to many people he is best known for playing both of the Winklevoss twins in The Social Network. He perfectly pairs Oliver's general confidence with his caution about starting a relationship with Elio- the film is a bit vague on why the caution, it isn't either characters Jewish heritage but it could be Elio's youth, Oliver's position in their house, or Oliver's discomfort with how he perceives his having a relationship with another man would be viewed by society (maybe the book is clear on that front but from the film I'd say a combo). The film doesn't define the sexuality of either of the main characters as the film seems to be more about their desire for each other as individuals than their gender (much like say Brokeback Mountain). It is also interesting for a film about desire in that there is very little nudity- supposedly both lead actors had no full frontal nudity clauses in their contracts which resulted in the script needing to be reworked as it did have more nudity- which is just interesting in showing that you can show desire without lots of flesh. 

12. Brigsby Bear



James (Kyle Mooney) lives in an underground bunker with his parents, Ted (Mark Hamill) and April (Jane Adams). Though he is in twenties, James spends his days watching a children's educational program called "Brigsby Bear" about a space travelling bear and analysing it, and his room covered in Brigsby related products. His parents have told him that they are the last humans on earth and only Ted leaves the bunker during the day, and everyone has to wear a gas mask when they do leave. One night, James grabs a gas mask and sits just outside the bunker to think but his thinking is interrupted by the arrival of the police. It turns out that James was stolen as a baby by Ted and April, and that the whole bunker existence is false. James is taken to meet his real parents (played by Matt Walsh and Michaela Watkins) and his younger sister Aubrey (Ryan Simpkins). As he is talked though the situation by the police (the main investigator is played by Greg Kinnear) and meets the police psychiatrist (played by Claire Danes), he has one question...what happened to Brigsby Bear? When he finds out there is no more Brigsby, he joins forces with the teenage friends of his sister to make a movie to finish the series.

This might be a surprise inclusion as I don't think it got a wide release (I saw it on a plane but it had screened at the Inverness Film Festival even though I opted not to see it there). The initial plot sounds a bit cliched as no bunker is ever legit but once James is in the world there is something delightful about his naivety (much like Kimmy in TV's The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt) and the idea of focusing on Brigsby is something new. Looking at "Brigsby Bear" I was reminded of many of the educational late 1980s TV shows I grew up watching so there was something weirdly nostalgic in the show as part of the concept. The thing about this film that brings it home towards the end is its joyously hopeful nature. The big names in this film- Hamill, Kinnear, and Danes- are outstanding, in particular Hamill who get to show his chops beyond being Luke Skywalker or the voice of the Joker. The film's writers (including its star Kyle Mooney) and director all spent time working on SNL so this definitely isn't a drama but then again isn't fully comedy and the balance is really interesting. Ultimately the film could be summed up as delightfully earnest more than anything else.

11. The Beguiled



The American Civil War rages but for the small number of remaining students and teachers at a small all girls school in Virginia, life or some semblance of it continues. Whilst picking mushrooms, one of the students comes across a wounded Union soldier (Colin Farrell). The head teacher (Nicole Kidman) agrees that they will allow the man to heal before they hand him over to the Confederate forces. In this close knit group with little interaction with the outside world or with men, the soldier becomes a fascination for all of the women of the house. The other remaining teacher (Kirsten Dunst) sneaks into the room where they have hidden the soldier and talks to him about travelling away from Virginia and he seems to suggest that he would assist her with this if he could. One of the elder students (Elle Fanning) openly lusts after the soldier and seeks to proportion him. All the women are drawn to him in some way and he dismisses none of them though initially seems to be more open to the teachers. As he heals the soldier seeks to convince the women to let him stay as a gardener and not to hand him to the Confederates. The women seem open to this idea to a degree until one fateful night changes their relationship to him.

This film is based on a novel which was been previously adapted into a film featuring Clint Eastwood as the soldier in the 1970s (the novel is from the 60s). I have not read the book nor seen the Eastwood film which is supposedly quite good, but I understand that both are more masculine and situate themselves more from the point of view of the solider whereas this is firmly from the point of view of the women with few (if any- I saw it back in July so I can't recall) scenes in which is the soldier is alone. I love Sofia Coppola's directorial work (her acting less so, less said about Godfather 3 the better) though I know others disagree but I challenge anyone not to love The Virgin Suicides or Lost in Translation. The Beguiled has a very similar colour palate to Coppola's other films and the use of white in particular on the women works beautifully here. This film actually makes a lovely companion piece to The Virgin Suicides- the two Coppola films based on works of fiction by others (The Bling Ring and Marie Antoinette being based on non fiction by others, and the reminder being original works by Coppola)- as both are about desire and a group of cloistered women. This flips the dynamic you see in The Virgin Suicides of a nameless mass of young boys desiring the cloistered women and instead now the cloistered women who desire the lone man in their midst. Both films also use that air of desire and claustrophobia to create this sense of humidity and near swamp like atmosphere despite the fact that neither are set somewhere that is particularly bayou like. The performances are amazing- Nicole Kidman is having an amazing year between this and Big Little Lies especially as she gets to deliver some of the funny moments of the film, Kirsten Dunst I know others don't warm to but I've always been a fan of and here she just embodies the naïveté needed for her character, and Elle Fanning's lust filled teen is spot on. Colin Farrell should also be thankful for just how amazingly attractive this film makes him look (not that he isn't normally attractive)- granted that is because the desiring female gaze is constantly on him. Coppola justifiable won the Palme Dor for direction at Cannes for this film (the directing award taken by Wind River at Cannes was for debut I believe). I have to acknowledge the elephant in the room with this film in that it had accusations of white washing levelled at it and I would agree in part with these accusations- it is very strange to see a Civil War film with no slaves or large scale mention of slavery (Coppola's excuse for this only half passes muster- she suggests that she envisioned that the slaves had fled the failing school in part because the story of slavery was not the one she was looking at telling in this film) and there is a character who is mixed race in the original but white in this version (Dunst's character who honestly I find it weird to have not been white originally because it would be have been exceedingly odd/rare for a mixed race woman to be a teacher in that era in the American south at a school for rich white girls but oddness of that choice by the original author aside, it appears to be a case of a white washing if you don't account for the probable lack of historical accuracy of the original source material). Is this problematic? It is and it probably is the reason this isn't in the top 10, however I cannot look past the fact that this might be the single best film ever made about female desire and the female gaze, and it is interesting it was released in a year in Hollywood that has been some much about the abuse of male desire.

Now this is the point where things might differ slightly from what I had originally planned to say (though they are the same films in the same order as that I had made note of) as my draft blog decided to disappear my comments on the top 10- I was half way through my comments on number one when I was last working on this and suddenly was back in number 11 land when I opened the computer today- which is quite the frustration (should have just finished and posted this back in early January as had been my original plan). Granted I think I can remember most of my original thoughts.

10. The Big Sick



Kumail (Kumail Nanjiani) is a stand up comic on the quest for his big break who also supports himself as an Uber driver. Most of his comedy is based on his experiences as the son of Pakistani immigrants and each week he goes to dinner with his parents where they try and set him with attractive women who are also of Pakistani descent and who have successful careers. His parents also ask him about his Muslim faith (which he has long since abandoned) and pressure him to go to law school (a plan he has also long since abandoned). One night at a gig, he is heckled by Emily (Zoe Kazan) and the two have what is supposed to be a one night stand but turns into a relationship. After dating for several months, Emily discovers in Kumail's flat the photographs of the women his parents have set him up with, and she confronts him about the photos and about whether her being white means that their relationship has no long term future. He acknowledges that it is unlikely they will be together long term because she is white and Emily dumps him. Not long after this, Kumail receives a phone call that tells him Emily has collapsed and is in hospital- he is still listed as an emergency contact. Kumail goes to the hospital and signs off on the papers to put Emily in an induced coma whilst the doctors figure out what is wrong with her. Only after this does he call Emily's parents who he meets for the first time when they rush to the hospital to see their daughter. Emily's parents, Beth and Terry (Holly Hunter and Ray Romano), don't understand why Kumail is around or involved at all as they know from Emily that prior to her getting sick, they had broken up. As the weeks pass with Emily in the coma, Kumail continues to try and make himself useful, and begrudging friendships develop between Kumail and Emily's parents.

Every year, I tend to have one indie rom com on my countdown and this is the 2017 entry of that ilk. Based on Kumail Nanjiani's relationship with his wife, Emily V. Gordon, this film was co-written by the couple. The script is smart and funny whilst also not steering clear of the fact that the film does have some darker themes, primarily illness and death. It has recently been nominated for best original screen play at the Oscars and that comes as little surprise to me. The film shines a light on the complexities facing interracial couples as they navigate not just any cultural differences but also societal stupidity. People may generally not feel that interracial couples face many difficulties in society today but just think on how rare it still is for a Hollywood rom com to have an interracial lead couple (this may not be the only film with an interracial lead couple I saw in 2017 but I'm fairly certain it was the only rom com in that camp- for example, both other comedies I recall having interracial couples featured in 2017 were MUCH darker and definitely not rom coms). It also has occasions of great dark humour and some of genuine pathos as Emily's illness continues undiagnosed for much of the film and there is the real prospect of her dying. The performances are really great with Nanjiani playing himself but not shying away from writing and playing a version of himself who is at times profoundly self centred, Kazan showing the skills she has mastered as the go to actress for indie rom coms in recent years, and Anupam Kher and Zenobia Shroff carrying off what could have become quite cliched roles as Kumail's parents with great skill. The big props acting wise though go to Holly Hunter and Ray Romano as Beth and Terry. They shine as these parents in a complex situation- made more complex by things I didn't mention in my summary- and I particularly thought Romano was outstanding (I have done a U Turn on him as an actor in recent years from hating Everybody Loves Raymond to thinking he near stole the show in scenes in the cancelled too soon Vinyl). In summary, really funny in a really smart way and now that I've given up on indie rom coms being so amazing that mainstream ones take note and get better, at least I'm happy that this got a broader release and more box office revenue than many of its indie rom com forebears.

9. Okja



In an alternative version of 2007, Lucy Mirando (Tilda Swinton) becomes CEO of the multinational Mirando corporation following the death of her father. A self styled environmentalist Lucy Mirando declares that her company has found an environmentally friendly way to solve food hunger. Her plan involves a new species, the super-pig (something between a hippo and a pig), which the Mirando corporation has discovered. The company has twenty six super pigs and these are to sent to twenty six farmers around the world to raise for 10 years before one of them is declared the best at raising the super pig and given a prize. Skip forward to 2017, on a remote farm in South Korea, Mija (Ahn Seo-Hyun) is being raised by her grandfather (Byun Hee-bong) and her best and only friend is Okja, the super pig which her grandfather was sent to rear ten years earlier. One day, Johnny Wilcox (Jake Gyllenhaal), a TV personality and the Mirando Corporation's in-house zoologist, arrives at their farm and declares that Okja has been declared the best super pig and will be relocated to New York. Mija is devastated and begs his grandfather to buy Okja so the super pig can stay with them but when he is unable/willing to do so, she runs away to Seoul in hopes of freeing Okja before the super pig is sent to the States. In Seoul, Mija's attempts to free Okja lead to attention from both the media and also a group of animal rights activists (lead by Jay played by Paul Dano) who are seeking to take Mirando down. Mija plans to take Okja and return to the farm but the animal rights activists try to enlist her to help them take down Mirando by bugging Okja. After the only activist who speaks Korean (K played by Steven Yeun) mistranslates Mija's wishes, the group believes that Mija agrees to their plan (she doesn't) and they arrange for Okja to be returned to Mirando and Mija to take advantage of the ticket that Mirando has given her to come to New York, now that her attempts to free Okja garnered so much attention.

This film was a bit of an oddity as it was a Netflix production and therefore got very limited cinema release beyond a few film festivals and its inclusion in those was even controversial (it is the first film by Netflix to debut at Cannes and there had to be release adjustments to allow that). I missed it at the Sydney Film Festival where it did show and therefore like most people only caught it on the small screen. It is the second Hollywood film for Korean director Bong Joon-ho, after Snow Piercer which you may remember from my countdown a few years ago.  There is pretty much not a universe in which I would not have loved this film as it is the work of a director I love, stars the actor who I suspect is the second most frequently appearing actor in my count downs (I know Mark Ruffalo is first but I strongly suspect Tilda Swinton is second especially after she appeared in three films on it two years ago- the year Snow Piercer came out), and is about food ethics and animal liberation. The film defies genre classification as many films by non Hollywood directors do- you can find it in about five different genre categories on Netflix and none of them is correct. It is at times quite funny but especially towards the end, it is gut wrenching and I don't think there is a film I cried more in during 2017. The performances are amazing led by Swinton and Gyllenhaal as the more known members of the cast- and Gyllenhaal's work at making the initially slimy and later much worse
John Wilcox come to life are without any vanity (he is never unrecognisable at points)- strongly supported by Dano (an indie star who needs to break through), Lily Collins, and Yuen (yay Glen from The Walking Dead- the only decent non zombie character on that show). The film ultimately belongs to the CSI artists and to Ahn Seo-Hyun. It is between the CSI work and Ahn's performance that you get to make Okja believable and without being able to feel that the super pig was a real animal with real capacity to feel pain (and more the super pigs like the regular pig are supposedly quite smart), the film would be nothing. Ahn would have had many scenes acting opposite a green scene/random object, and for a 12/13 year old (she recently turned 14), she delivered a performance that is the envy of many adults who have failed in the acting with CSI space. I would believe for its discussion of food ethics and availability that this was a must see film in 2017 even if it was of a lesser quality but being as amazing as it is I cannot recommend it highly enough. Oddly though it isn't the only film in my countdown that hits on animal ethics by virtual of non exist creatures but more on that to come...

8. The Disaster Artist



This is the story of what is currently considered both "the worst film ever made" and a cult classical, The Room. In San Francisco in 1998, a young aspiring actor Greg Sestero (Dave Franco) is blown away in his acting class by the very odd performance given by older class mate, Tommy Wiseau (James Franco). Their acting teacher destroys Wiseau's performance but Sestero has the opposite view and seeks out Wiseau and the two begin to become friends despite the fact Sestero is 19 and Wiseau is at least in his thirties. Wiseau speaks with an odd accent (vaguely Eastern European) but claims to have been born in the States, and that is just the start of the mysterious flags this guy raises. One day, Wiseau declares to Sestero that the two of them should relocate to LA to better their acting careers and that they can easily live in the apartment he owns there (another flag- Wiseau owns decent sized apartments in San Francisco and LA but doesn't appear to have a job). Over his mother's objections, Sestero goes with Wiseau to LA, and things don't appear to be going too badly for him when they get there- he doesn't get regular acting work but he does secure an agent, gets a few auditions, and a girlfriend (Alison Brie). Wiseau on the other hand fails completely and starts to get quite jealous of Sestero. Wiseau decides instead of just giving up on acting that he will write, direct, star in, and produce his own film, and despite being increasingly frustrated with Wiseau, Sestero agrees to co-star and co-produce the film if it becomes a reality. In the next three years, the two men fall out of regular contact but then Wiseau finishes the script and true to his word, Sestero still agrees to be in it. As production begins and cast and crew are hired, it becomes obvious that Wiseau has no knowledge of how to make a film but what he does have is continued access to the mysterious pot of money that has already funded apartments in two of the world's most expensive cities. As filming continues, Wiseau's strange habits lead to hatred from the cast and crew, and Sestero ends up stuck in the middle.


Now there are three comedies above this on my countdown but this might be funnier than they are (they also have other things I love going for them). I have not seen The Room- I really want to and definitely had planned to see it before I saw The Disaster Artist but it has proven hard to find a legal screening of it close enough to me- so if you find it on anywhere I can get to easily, please let me know. This film is hilarious but beautifully it is hilarious without actively going out of its way to mock its subjects- the film could so easily have mocked Tommy Wiseau as many have before but (and I'm not sure if being based on Greg Sestero's book as the two are still friends helped this) it doesn't to the point where Wiseau even appears in a post credits scene (sorry spoilers). Many have commented and I agree that this film is very reminiscent of Tim Burton's brilliant Ed Wood which is a also funny without being cruel story of a director who made "the worst film ever made"- not sure what Ed Wood would make of Plan 9 From Outer Space having lost that title (it is one of the reasons I want to see The Room as I've seen Plan 9 and I want to know if it is legitimately worse- from the small bits I have seen, I do suspect it is). James Franco directed and produced as well as starred in this and it is by far and away the best performance he has ever given as he is quite convincing as Wiseau despite normally looking nothing like him (basically having himself MUCH less attractive for the role as Wiseau isn't an attractive man) and also having to pull off Wiseau's incomprehensibly strange accent. They also manage at times to make you almost forget that Dave and James Franco are brothers- that said Sestero and Wiseau look nothing alike, and even under James Franco's make up you can at times see the similarities between the brothers. Dave Franco is very solid as the film's straight man and it would be nice to start seeing him more in a few more things as he has been too long overshadowed by his big brother. I also recommend staying for the credits as they show side by side scenes that they re-filmed for The Disaster Artist and the original scenes from The Room.

Now before you call me on this, I know I excluded Baby Driver from this list due to the allegations against Kevin Spacey but this is still here despite the allegations against James Franco. I will say that I think the Spacey allegations are worse due to the age (at time of assault) of those who have accused him (they were teens and those who accused Franco were adults at them of the unwanted attention from him) BUT that doesn't really excuse me including one film and excluding another with the same issue facing them. In honesty it is laziness on my part as I started writing this in early January before the allegations against Franco came out on January 8 and I just didn't bother to remove this after the allegations. If you want to exclude it mental, it doesn't change the list as number 15 is tied.

7. It




Getting to the films I saw more than once in 2017 (of the films above this I saw two three times and one of them four times (yes it is my number 1)), I saw It twice. I also decided to blog my thoughts on it in the context of what novels we choose to adapt into film back when I first saw it and that post included my ranting about the film in more length than I would in my end of year ranking so you should read that instead of my editing it. It is here- http://clarewoodley.blogspot.com.au/2017/09/we-need-to-speak-about-bev.html. Summary, it is super solid coming of age film with great performances and yep a creepy clown.

6. Thor: Ragnarok



After the events of Avengers: Age of Ultron, Thor (Chris Hemsworth) has been travelling the nine realms in search of the infinity stones. He is imprisoned by Satur, a fire demon, who it is predicted will destroy Asgard when Ragnarok occurs. Thor defeats Satur and heads home to Asgard for the first time since the events of Thor: The Dark World. As soon as he meets with Odin (Anthony Hopkins), he realises something is wrong with his father and reveals to all present that Odin is not Odin but Loki (Tom Hiddleston) in disguise. Thor forces Loki to tell him where their father is, and Loki takes him to Earth to where he left Odin. Finding Odin not where he was left in New York, after a brief interaction with Dr Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), the brothers find their father in remote Norway. Before opting to die, Odin reveals to his sons that they have an older sister, Hela the goddess of death (Cate Blanchett), who must be kept out of Asgard at all costs. As soon as Odin dies, a portal opens and Hela appears. Loki opens the Bifröst and Hela follows the brothers trying to fight them off. Loki and Thor are thrown out of the Bifröst, and Hela continues to Asgard. Thor crashes down onto the trash planet of Sakaar with Loki nowhere in sight. Thor is captured by Scrapper 142 (Tessa Thompson), a bounty hunter, and taken to the Grandmaster (Jeff Goldblum), the ruler of Sakaar who holds a gladiatorial contest. Thor finds that Loki crashed on the same planet slightly before he did and he has managed to charm his way into the Grandmaster's entourage whilst Thor is enslaved as a gladiator. In the fighters' quarter (read gaol), Thor meets Korg (Taika Waititi), a fellow enslaved fighter who once led a failed rebellion, who reveals that there is a grand champion is undefeated and also that Scrapper 142 is an Asgardian- it transpire that she is a Valkyrie who was involved in the last battle with Hela. Thor enters the battle arena to fight the champion of the contests and finds himself face to face with fellow Avenger, The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo). After the battle ends, Thor tries to recruit The Hulk and/or Bruce Banner to help him free Asgard from Hela. Meanwhile on Asgard, Hela has killed the Warriors Three, enslaved the people, redecorated, and raised some zombie soldiers, and Heimdall (Idris Elba) is trying to hide some people from Hela and has stolen the sword that opens the Bifröst to stop Hela using it to conquer all of the nine realms. 

Where would my list be with a Mark Ruffalo film? Since I started doing longer yearly posts about my favourite films of the previous year, he has been on every one of them at least once and he is the only actor with that honour. Love of Mark Ruffalo (and other frequently featured actor, Tom Hiddleston, who has only missed one year I think) aside, this film just flat out stole the title I had previously given to the first Guardians of the Galaxy film of being the funniest/funnest film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It is another film that I saw multiple times (three in total). As anyone who saw the film that came in number four in my countdown last year (Hunt for the Wilderpeople), Taiki Waititi makes hilarious films and I'm so happy that they gave him fairly free reign with this and that it means the world outside the Antipodes now might know who he is (they better- not just because of his awesome direction but also because Korg steals every scene he is in). The script is hilarious, littered with special Easter eggs for Australians and Kiwis, and also call backs to that constantly remind you that you are in the Marvel universe (if at times destroying that such as the speedy deaths of the Warriors Three who have never been used well). The performances are delightfully fun and over the top. Hemsworth is finally given the opportunity to do more than speak clunky dialogue and be the most serious main character in most all of the Marvel property, and you get to some of that Hemsworth charm that shone so brightly in the recent Ghostbusters remake among other things. Hiddleston is clearly still having fun with Loki but Loki has always been the most fun (and actual probably just the best) thing in the Thor world and there is a reason he is the most enduring and beloved Marvel villain on the big screen, so this was more Loki with an extra bit of humour which just made him all the more charismatically brilliant. It was interesting to see them do more with the Hulk side of the Hulk which will be interesting for future Marvel films, and Ruffalo played both sides of the character well as he always has but his performance as the Hulk side of the Hulk instead of just Bruce Banner is really just getting better with each film he is in and he even got the opportunity to be part of some of the films funniest moment when he was the green guy. From a supporting point of view, well Jeff Goldblum is just the most Jeff Goldblum he can be and that is all you really want when he is on screen, and Anthony Hopkins expertly balances the truly hilarious in the scene where he is playing Loki pretending to be Odin with the extreme pathetic (in the literal sense of the word) in Odin's death scene, Karl Urban is great if underused as the deeply stupid Asgardian soldier Skurge who becomes Hela's lackey, Idris Elba continues to somehow be believable as the stalwart Heimdall, and Taiki Waititi I've already mentioned is just brilliant as Korg (who knew I could love a blue rock monster with a Maori accent as much as I loved the character of Korg). You may notice I forgot something but in fact I didn't as I'm getting to it...and that is the women! Along with another film I've getting to and the newest Marvel property which I saw a couple of weeks back (Black Panther- early call but it will definitely be on 2018 list), this is another example of how well films in the nerd space are doing in their representation of women (also with casting people of colour- this less than the other two but it is still doing well considering how white the earlier Thor films were except for support cast presence of Idris Elba and Tabdanobu Asano). The women in this film just flat out owned it! Rachel House who had a killer year in 2016 with Moana and Hunt for the Wilderpeople is brilliant in her couple of scenes as the Grandmaster's second in command. Then you have two actresses whose work I love in the two main female roles and where could you go wrong. I have been waiting since Veronica Mars (remember I said it would come up again in this countdown) for Tessa Thompson to get more attention and bigger roles (in terms of box office as she was the lead in Dear White People- the film version- and that was a big role in a film everyone should see but sadly not enough people saw it) and finally between this and Westworld in 2017 her time has definitely come. Just that gender stereotype defying introduction scene sold the whole character to me in one hit especially when I found out she was told to think Han Solo which she totally delivered with a side of physical comedy and fake drunkenness. I cannot wait for more Valkyrie in the upcoming Avengers film as she is just flat out boss and unlike some female superheroes, she ain't never going to need a man (superpower having or not) to help her out. Also good work in recasting the blonde figure from the comics as a person of colour and also here's hopes that they either maintain that she is gay as in the comics or make her bi as the film makers and Thompson have suggested they might do because sexuality diversity is the one thing still largely absent in the comic book movie space. Now Cate Blanchett what to say of Cate Blanchett... Pretty much it was like they went to one of the best actors working in the world today and said to her "Want to be in a comic book movie? Do you also want to have the chance to ham it up and go completely over the top as a bad arse villain?" and shockingly she said yes. She just chews the scenery, hams it up, and has over the top fun, and you cannot love her more for it because she so rarely plays roles like this and it is so great to see her just loving the hell out of and I mean who does love an over-the-top bordering on camp villain because I know I do.

Minor additional praise points... The little play Loki as Odin stages with Sam Neill as Odin, Matt Damon as Loki, and Luke Hemsworth as Thor...priceless, I laughed out loud at that scene every time I saw it. The cost of paying for one of the most expensive songs of all time for the soundtrack and then using it repeatedly...worth it (I just love anytime anyone forks out for Immigrant Song and lyrics wise it was just crying out to be used in a Thor film). 


I don't have an Aussie film on my list this year but since this was filmed in Sydney and Brisbane, and has Aussies as the lead hero and villain, and a Kiwi director and a couple of Kiwi support actors I claiming this as my Aussie film of 2017 even if it was American backed.


5. Blade of the Immortal





Manji (Takuya Kimura) is a samurai fighter. After he kills the corrupt warlord for whom he works and the warlord's other bodyguards- including his younger sister's husband- he and his younger sister are on the run and they meet a strange old lady. Manji ignores the old lady and quickly he and his sister are ambushed by a large band of ronin. The ronin leader kills Manji's sister and against impossible odds, Manji takes out the ronin but not without taking fatal wounds. As he lies dying, the old lady reappears and she introduces blood worms into Manji's body which heals his wounds and make him un-killable. Jump forward 52 years. Young Rin Asano (Hana Sugisaki) escapes the massacre of her parents and all of her father's samurai trainees at her father's dojo at the hands of the Ittō-ryū led by Kagehisa Anotsu (Sota Fukushi). Rin, who is an untrained young teen (she looks possibly even younger but Hana Sugisaki is 20 so I'm going with teens), declares that she is going to avenge the death of her parents and so seeks out the mysterious immortal samurai who lives on the edge of town as her bodyguard. Manji refuses to help her initially but after Rin is attacked by one of the more sadistic members of Ittō-ryū who not just reveals that he raped her mother but also has sewn her mother's head to his shoulder, he saves her and join her in her quest to take down Kagehisa Anotsu and the rest of the Ittō-ryū.

Foreign language film of the year! This one is very silly so I have to do some honorary mentions which were just outside my top 15- the Israeli film The Women's Balcony (it is hilarious and a great examination of the role of women in Jewish religious communities) and the Hungarian film Strangled (based on a serial killer case in Hungary in the 1960s) are definitely worth checking outI saw these three at the Inverness Film Festival and actually saw a few other foreign films elsewhere so it was a good year for me actually seeing films in not English.  Back to Blade of the Immortal, it is the new film by a Japanese director who I love, Takashi Miike - I feel like my foreign language films of the year are often Japanese and Korean. If you are thinking samurai, ronin, blood worms, impossible odds sword fights...what's the deal? Well Miike is mates with Quentin Tarantino if that helps explain it to you- Tarantino even appears in my favourite Miike film (Sukiyaki Western Django if you are curious). As you know if you often read my end of the year film wrap ups, I love me this kind of over the top crazy so bring on the bloodworms! Takuya Kimura and Hana Sugisaki are great in the main roles and Sota Fukushi's Kagehisa reminds me of Kylo Ren in the best ways. I know you were sold once I said impossible odds sword fights so just go and just it out!
4. Ingrid Goes West

Sadly I cannot embed the trailer so follow this link- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G5l5q-DT2g

Ingrid (Aubrey Plaza) is a deeply lonely women with not great mental health who is deeply wedded to her Instagram. As the film opens, she crashes the wedding of a "friend" from Instagram. Said friend is someone she barely knows (if I recall they went to school together) and after the friend casually expressed sympathy to Ingrid's mother dies, Ingrid becomes obsessed with her and her social media feed. After the incident at the wedding, Ingrid is hospitalised for mental health concerns. Upon her release, she overhears an actual friend of the woman whose wedding she crashed mention that Ingrid had been unhealthily obsessed with her friend. Ingrid starts searching for distraction on Instagram and she stumbles on the feed of Taylor Sloane  (Elizabeth Olsen) and develops a new obsession. After Taylor responds to Ingrid's comment on one of her photos, Ingrid becomes determined to actually be friends with Taylor and she packs up her life and cashes out the money her mother left her and moves across the country from Pennsylvania to California to track Taylor down. Ingrid moves in the apartment in the backyard of Dan (O'Shea Jackson Jnr) near to where Taylor lives and starts to engineer ways to meet Taylor and to make herself more like Taylor. After she returns Taylor's dogs (having first dognapped it), Ingrid finally meets Taylor and her husband, Ezra (Wyatt Russell). Taylor and Ingrid actually start to form a friendship but a lot of it is based on Ingrid just trying to make herself more like Taylor. Ingrid also starts a romantic relationship with Dan. It looks like for all the creepy social media stalking life is going to work out as Ingrid wants it to but then Taylor's brother and his girlfriend show up. Taylor's brother, Nicky (Billy Magnussen), is instantly suspicious of Taylor and Ingrid's friendship and where Ingrid has appeared from. Nicky's casual girlfriend, Harley Chung (Pom Klementieff), is a fashion blogger with a bigger social media following then Taylor, and Taylor starts to hang out with Harley and Nicky in place of Ingrid, making Ingrid deeply jealous.

There are a few actors who I have declared are having the year to break through- Tessa Thompson for example and if you bridge 2017/8 Timothee Chalamet is also in that basket with Call Me by Your Name and Ladybird- and this is a film with two actors who aren't breaking through but are having amazing years. Firstly Elizabeth Olsen who is twice in my countdown this year between this and Wind River. There is something about Taylor that to me is quite different to the normal Elizabeth Olsen role and she is so convincingly good that I had to keep reminding myself that it was her. Taylor shows that the social media obsession of Ingrid is just a few steps from what is the norm and also displays the falsity of social media- Taylor on social media is to my mind deeply superficial but Taylor off social media has uncertainty and depth. Secondly obviously the amazing Aubrey Plaza who I was worried would be stuck in not great movie hell (did anyone else see Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates because it wasn't great though she was OK in it) as Hollywood struggled with what to do with her in a post Parks and Rec world. Between this and the amazing Legion (my close second for the best TV series based on a comic after Jessica Jones and in part it is Plaza's performance that sells it), Plaza had an amazing 2017 with roles that start to move her further away from April Ludgate. Ingrid is a painfully honest portrait of the negative impacts of social media obsession coinciding with poor health mental and yet there is an uncomfortable reality of the fact that even though Ingrid's obsession is extreme, you can see in it the edges of the problems social media creates for everyone. There is something sweet about Plaza's performance that makes you almost root for Ingrid in her obsession. As a film, it is a very timely biting reflection of the modern age of social media and also of the treatment or ignoring of loneliness and mental health in social, and the ways this can painfully intersect with social media usage- Aubrey Plaza deleted her Instagram whilst or just after making this film. Also as dark as this all sounds, it is very funny- it is a comedy in fact.

The film also just took out best First Feature at the Independent Spirit awards which is normally the awards ceremony that synchs most with my opinions- particularly this year in fact.

3. Moonlight

Once again this trailer cannot be embedded as go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23amIZMeFN0

Set across three time periods, Moonlight opens in Miami with "Little" (Alex Hibbert) hiding from bullies in a crackhouse and being discovered by drug dealer, Juan (Mahershala Ali). Little will not tell Juan who he is and Juan takes him to his place where Little meets Juan's young girlfriend, Teresa (Janelle Monae). Ultimately Little tells Juan where he lives and Juan takes him home to his mother, Paula (Naomie Harris). Little continues to try and spend time with Juan and Teresa, and Juan becomes a default father figure to the young boy. It is quickly revealed that Paula is an addict and it is hinted that Juan might be one of her dealers. Paula yells at her son that she knows why he is bullied and Little flees to Juan and Teresa who he asks about the insult that the other children call him (not replicating it but I'll say it's a gay slur and you can likely guess). Juan and Teresa comfort Little and say that if he is gay that is not a problem, but then Little hits them with a big question which is whether Juan is Paula's dealer. Cut to a few years later and Little is now a teenager and goes by his actual name, Chiron (he is now played by Ashton Sanders). Chiron is still bullied and has only one real friend, Kevin (Kevin appears in the first time period too- he is initially played by Jaden Piner and is now played by Jharrel Jerome). Juan has died but Chiron is still friends with Teresa and Paula is still a drug addict who now supports herself with prostitution and also by pressuring Chiron to borrow money from Teresa. Chiron has dreams that indicate that he is jealous of girls who might approach Kevin, and then one night on the beach, Chiron and Kevin share a kiss and a little more which is Chiron's first sexual experience. The next day at school, the class bully pressures Kevin into participating in a hazing ritual that targets Chiron. After this event, Chiron attacks the class bully with a degree of violence that ends with his being arrested. Jump forward again and Chiron now goes by Black, a name given to him by Kevin many years earlier (he is now played by Trevante Rhodes). Black is a drug dealer living in Atlanta and Paula who is now clean and living in a drug treatment centre frequently calls her son. Black then one night receives a call from Kevin (now played by Andre Holland) who asks him to look him up if he is ever in Miami. Black then embarks for Miami to see his old friend.

And we have reached the film that knocked Call Me by Your Name so much further down as the themes are to a degree similar though in my option there are many more to be discussed with Moonlight then just desire, and also both are marked by beautiful cinematography. This was a 2016 film in most countries but came up in early January 2017 in Australia so as I said it was just bad luck for Call Me by Your Name which without this as a comparison point would have solidly cracked the top 10. Also sorry about the amount of plot description that verges on spoiling but you cannot really talk about Moonlight without touching on all three time periods. Where to start on this film, well I'm going to start with a thing I love when done well and that is cinematography. This is without doubt the most beautiful film I've seen in years and it had solid competition this year from Call Me by Your Name and the next film on this list (though some might disagree on that). The use of light and dark, in particular night as much of the film is set at night, and the reflection on water, and the skin tone as part of a palate (just look at the gorgeous poster from an example) are just perfectly artistically captured. It is visually stunning to a degree that is difficult to capture in words. There is an ongoing visual metaphor of darkness and especially dark water with the main character's sexuality, and especially an idea that in or near water unlike on land, he can be who he really is. The script is also sparse with Chiron's sexuality just being one of many things that the film treats with a silence as if almost forced into that silence. Also as I said it is not just about sexuality as the movie is also a window in race relations in America (it was great to see this movie with no major white characters win best picture at the last Oscars), sexuality in the black community, poverty as it intersects with race, and also rolling issues of drug use in poor communities. The stoic silence of Chiron is played brilliantly by all three actors in the role, and I particularly thought the teen Chiron and Kevin were amazing. Ali, Monae, and Harris are great in their supporting roles, and the underlying possible guilt of Juan is just perfectly tempered in Ali's performance. It is beautiful, it is restrained, and it is just a must see drama.

Interestingly Moonlight is based on a play I have not seen but in the play supposedly all three time lines play out at the same time, and I'd be really interested to see that.

2. Star Wars: The Last Jedi




As the opening crawl let's the viewer know, though Starkiller Base was destroyed (back in The Force Awakens) the First Order is still the power in the galaxy and they are hunting down the Resistance. The Last Jedi opens just after TFA ended and the Resistance are now packing out their base that was saw in the previous film as the First Order has located them. Poe Dameron  (Oscar Isaac) is trying to distract their largest ship from the transport ships fleeing the Resistance base but having succeeded in that, he decides that he cannot resist (no pun intended) attempting a risky plan to take out the dreadnought (the First Order's most powerful ship) despite the orders of General Organa (Carrie Fisher) and the advice of BB8. The attack succeeds but not without massive losses on the Resistance side and as a punishment Leia demotes Poe as the Resistance forces flee through hyperspace. When the Resistance cruiser emerges from hyperspace they find that the First Order has somehow followed them. TIE fighters fly out to attack the Resistance ships led by Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) in his own small ship. The Resistance cruisers cannot risk another jump to light speed as they are both low on fuel and also they know the First Order will attack them again so they try to outpace the large First Order ships but before they can manage this the TIE fighter attack the bridge and though Kylo Ren hesitates (likely due to the fact the lingering guilt of having killed his father stopping him from killing his mother), the other fighter shoot at the bridge, killing all of those on the bridge (including Star Wars stalwart Admiral Ackbar) except Leia who saves herself using the Force but her fight for survival leaves her comatose. The Resistance appoints Vice Admiral Holdo (Laura Dern) to lead their forces whilst Leia incapacitated and Poe is not happy with Holdo's leadership style and starts to plot his own plan for escaping the First Order. Also onboard the Resistance cruiser is Finn (John Boyega) who wakes from his own coma at the end of TFA a few scenes earlier and when faced with the likelihood of Resistance defeat, he attempts to flee in an escape pod. Finn is stopped by Rose Tico (Kelly Marie Tran), a young mechanic whose pilot sister died in Poe's stupid plan in the opening scene. Rose with some input from Finn figures out how the First Order is tracking them and they convene with Poe to develop a plan to stop the tracking which is contrary to Vice Admiral Holdo's plan with the assistance of Lieutenant Connix (Billie Lourd) and Maz Kanata (Lupita Nyong'o) and begrudgingly C3PO (Anthony Daniels). Meanwhile whilst all this is going on, there are also regularly check-ins with Rey (Daisy Ridley). Rey's plot line picks up where it ended in TFA with her on Ahch-To holding out a light sabre to Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill). Luke takes the light sabre and tossing it aside tells Rey he will not train her as a Jedi, even after Rey tells him that his sister is the one who sent her. Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo taking over from Peter Mayhem who being in his 70s and suffering chronic pain is no longer up to the role) crushes in and between Chewie and Rey, Luke is told of the death of Han Solo to the hands of Kylo Ren in TFA. Even this is not sufficient to convince Luke to train Rey and instead she follows him on daily tasks around the island in hopes of convincing him. One night, Luke boards the Millennium Falcon where he encounters R2-D2 (Jimmy Vee taking over from Kenny Baker who died no long after TFA wrapped) who uses Leia's original voice message to Obi Wan from back in New Hope to convince Luke to give Rey a chance. Luke begrudgingly offers Rey three lessons. As Luke trains her, he is worried about the fact she is intrigued by the dark and the light, and the fact that he sees himself as having failed with Kylo Ren. Meanwhile, Rey starts having force visions (some termed it "force timing" and I love that) of Kylo Ren and talking to him (well first trying to shoot him and then talking) though neither knows how or why, and as the two build a connection, Rey also starts to wonder what really happened between Luke and Kylo as both recount it differently.  Kylo is also increasingly conflicted due to his murder of his father, his gradually disillusionment with his old desire to be like his grandfather, and his treatment by Supreme Leader Snoke (Andy Serkis).


That seems like a good place to stop and avoid spoilers. I'm guessing everyone knew this film was coming and after TFA I figure you might have thought it would be number one. Well though it got better with every viewing, I would rank my number one as above both TFA and The Last Jedi and even New Hope to the point that it was competing with Empire to be one of my favourite films of all time- oh my revised Star Wars order now goes Empire, New Hope, TFA and Last Jedi tied, Jedi, Rogue One, Revenge of the Sith, various standalone Ewok films, Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones. It is easy to start with what I didn't love about Last Jedi as it wasn't much and did see the film three times (less than I saw TFA at the cinema but chalk it up to my busy couple of months). Things I didn't love... the space walrus milking scene (why was that needed!) and the underuse of Captain Phasma (Gwendoline Christie) were the two big things I didn't love, and yes I wasn't a huge fan of the way Leia's Force ability was revealed but I was so happy it was established as film canon that she has that ability- in more than an off handed remark or two in the original trilogy kind of way- that I forgave them for the fact that it wasn't handled well. What did I love about this film....EVERYTHING else. It was the funniest Star Wars film from the initial prank call by Poe to General Hux (Domhnall Gleeson) onwards. It was the prettiest Star Wars film ever- the visuals were STUNNING and especially the big light sabre fight and final fight scene just beautiful. It had quality world building- Ahch-To in particular  especially with its personality filled critters (yes I'm a fan of the Porg) was stunning and as was Crait and Canto Bight I found really interesting. It finally completely kills midichlorians as a stupid pre-equals idea that is best forgotten and gave the most beautiful explanation of the Force as an idea of balance. The performances were great and in a film series that lost one major player between its last film and this one in Kenny Baker, and another just after it was shot in Carrie Fisher, I feel that actually added to the performances of the older cast. Whereas TFA was the best Star Wars acting by Harrison Ford, Last Jedi hands that mantle to Mark Hamill who gives probably the best performance of anyone in any Star Wars film ever and also to Carrie Fisher who I have to say had a great performance to go out on- where were the Oscar noms?!?! The plan had been that of the older characters TFA would focus on Han, Last Jedi on Luke, and Episode IX on Leia so I'm not sure what the plan is now. What I can say is that I shred not a few tears in scenes where I realised that this was the last time I'd be seeing not just the amazing Carrie Fisher but also the character of Leia, a big childhood hero of mine, on the screen.  The surprise old character cameo also just gave me delight every time I saw the film.The younger actor performances were also great- Daisy Ridley added an extra layer to Rey I felt, Oscar Isaac continued to try to steal every scene and managed to be charming even when Poe was being an arse, Adam Driver took the emo Kylo of TFA and added more substance in his grief, Billy Lourd's role got expanded and yay for her taking up the Star Wars from her mother, Domhnall Gleeson continued to nail evil straight man to the overly emotionally Kylo- though poor John Boyega was a little underused if still great as Finn. Of the new characters, I love Laura Dern in all things and this is no exception, Kelly Marie Tran is delightful as Rose, and though I normally don't love him (though I don't know why) I even think Benicio del Toro was good as DJ. I also love that as some corners of the internet (those who really hated this as a Star Wars film) whinged out the racial and gender diversity of TFA, the film makers responded by replacing the one white guy who died (Harrison Ford) with another woman (Laura Dern), another person of colour (Benicio del Toro), and the double whammy a woman of colour (Kelly Marie Tran). Do I love the continual bringing of race and gender diversity to the table? Hells yeah I do and also the hinting at a mixed race couple (or two though the latter very briefly and mainly driven by the pure charisma of one actor) in Finn and Rose... LOVE it (though it did knife my favourite "ship" of TFA even if that ship still gave us the best line of Last Jedi, "Finn...naked...leaking"...Finn and Poe forever! Even though Star Wars might not be ready for a mixed race gay love story yet). Last Jedi maintain the 50/50 men to women ratio on screen at all times vibe of TFA and yes it is the second nerd space film that with great gender representation that I alluded to when I was speaking about Thor: Ragnarok. It has been said that this is the most political Star Wars film and I agree and love it all the more for it. In the year of #metoo, you had whole plot line about men telling with women in power (very poorly in Poe's case -as Leia and Holdo agree, you love him but he is an arse...not that they say arse...here's hoping he gets past it) and just heaps of women being boss in actual careers, be they Jedi trainees, senior military commanders, mechanics, or pilots- sure Leia went on diplomatic missions in the original trilogy and her mother was a Senator but there was nothing on this scale in any of the films before TFA. The most amazing military move of the film (which is also the height of its cinematography and sound editing beauty) is the act of a woman. You had two sequences that could be read as being about animal rights- the Chewie and the porgs scene (I'm not ashamed to say one of my favourites in the whole film) and the scenes with the creatures on Canto Bight- people are suggesting the Chewie and the porgs scene is the Chewie goes vego scene and I think that isn't the case but love that people think it is. Also tonnes of dialogue about the costs of war especially in terms of lives, the funding of the arms industry, and the guilt of both sides in a war. Even in the fashion design (though I learnt this from YouTube), thoughts on grief in a very subtle way and the way society demands people compartmentalise it.  There are also ideas of what a moral imperative is and what drives a person to act.

I knew Rian Johnson would do well as I love his previous work and he sure delivered!

Oh and to the online whiners... One, the complaint I saw about Last Jedi not having enough action and having too much character development...a) what's wrong with character development? b) go back and watch Empire again because you could almost level that at Empire, it was just that the characters being developed were mainly white dudes, and c) there was plenty of action proportionally to length as this is the longest Star Wars film. Two, the Rey is a Mary Sue argument...I cannot disagree with that one especially considering the parental reveal (though I still think there is more to it and my theory would prove true still on this front) but I have to say as a trope I actually don't hate the Mary Sue- sure we aren't going to fix centuries of rubbish representation of women in popular culture with one insanely, impossibly capable woman but how many men like that (Gary Sues as they are now termed) have we sat though...seriously that is pretty much the basis for every Superman film and so I'm going give Rey a pass on this as I still love her and that she is a little awkward and that she is to young girls what Leia was to me and more because she will never have to don a bikini for the male gaze.

There is my yearly Star Wars gush and I could say more but I will stop.

1. Get Out 

Another trailer that cannot be embedded- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM1YpntE840

The film opens on a young black guy walking through a wealthy white suburb before a car starts following him and he is ultimately kidnapped. Cut to Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) a photographer who is going away for the weekend to meet his girlfriend's parents for the first time. Chris quizzes Rose (Allison Williams) on whether she has told her parents that he is black and she dismisses this with a laugh and says that her parents will not have any problems with that. So Chris leaves his dog in the care of his best mate, Rod (Lil Rel Howery), and the two heads out for the weekend. On the way to Rose's parents they hit a deer which leads to uncomfortable encounter with a local cop. When they arrive, Chris meets Rose's father Dean (Bradley Whitford), a neurosurgeon, and her mother Missy (Catherine Kenner), a psychotherapist who specialises in hypnotherapy. Whilst Dean and Missy try to be overly nice to Chris, Chris is a little surprised to discover the couple has two servants, Georgina (Betty Gabriel) and Walter (Marcus Henderson), who are both black and who both act very strangely. Then Dean and Missy remind Rose that this is the weekend that a big family gathering is planned and suddenly Chris finds himself preparing to meet the boarder circle of Rose's family and their friends, and also Rose's brother Jeremy (Caleb Landry Jones) shows up and starts to sprout comments that are straight down the line racist. Late that night, Chris sneaks out for a cigarette and encounters even more strange behaviour from Georgina and Walter, and as he sneaks back into the house, he encounters Missy who offers to hypnotise him to help him quit smoking. After a session with Missy, he wakes up with no clear memory of the session but also no desire to smoke and the feeling something is off. Chris also discovers someone has been unplugging his phone and as Rose's family gathering begins he feels more and more out of place.

So yes this is the film I saw four times in 2017 and yes I am aware how uncomfortably similar that sounds to Dean's declaration that he "would have voted for Obama a third if I could". It is a perfectly made comedy horror film- don't let the trailer put you off on the horror front though as friends who hate horror saw this and loved it, even my mother who isn't a horror fan liked it. That said, it is a perfectly made comedy horror designed to make white liberal folk reflect on their own place in the race debate. It is not just about the type of racism you would normally think of but is also about the ways in which those who seek to go out of their way to make sure those of other races feel more comfortable, ultimately often just worsen the situation. The ways in which declaring yourself an ally in the fight for racial equality doesn't actually make you one (I would argue to be an ally to any community, you don't declare your status, the community gives it to you) and that often this type of action just end up pushes meaningful discussion to the background and tries to assimilate people of colour by making them more palatable to the white community. As leftie, this film seemed very pointed to me and really made me think more than any other film I saw this year about my own place in discussions like this considering my own white privilege. It made me think on race relations in Australia which have their own set of scars that are different to the scars that slavery brings in the States. I also felt in the first year of Trump where so many Americans went out to show solidarity to other communities sidelined by this president that this film was there to make them think about how best that worked.

Also this could be paired with Wind River as one of the themes is the lack of reporting and lack of cases being solved when black men go missing. Pretty much if you aren't a white dude and you go missing in the States, your chances of being found are very low- the gap between white dudes and white women is bad enough but then you have the black community even lower on that scale, and lowest of all the Native American community.

These important points aside, which will likely make it a must see film for years to come, it is also amazingly acted by all involved. Especially to single out, Betty Gabriel who is outstanding as Georgina and of course Daniel Kaluuya who is great as Chris and I hope to see in many more things in the years to come (he was subsequently great in Black Panther). Also nice association evoked to The West Wing in casting Bradley Whitford and Being John Malkovich in Catherine Kenner- not sure that was intended but both work in the film's favour. Also outstanding directorial debut by Jordan Peele as well as brilliant script from him too.

So yes this was my number one film of 2017 and as I said now pushing to be one of my favourites of all time, and I'm super happy that it got Oscar noms and just took out Best Film at the Independent Spirit Awards (as I said they often agree with me).

Honourable mentions this year go to two documentaries as I didn't get any into my top 15 and those are I'm Not Your Negro and An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power. Trailers for both of these are here:







So onto my worst film of 2017 and it is a three way tie...though I did fall asleep in one of them and flat out opt not to finish it.


Firstly The Snowman which I already blogged about here- http://clarewoodley.blogspot.com.au/2017/10/lets-talk-about-crime.html so just read that so I don't have to think on it again.

Secondly Ghost In The Shell- go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4VmJcZR0Yg for the  trailer. I love the 1995 anime but this was just awful by comparison and not just because of the whitewashing. It make Ghost in The Shell boring and I don't know how you do that. I was in two minds about including it as a worst film as I fell asleep during it on a plane and opted not to finish it but to rewatch Get Out instead. That said, I love films so much that not finishing something is a BIG statement.

And thirdly, no prizes for guessing this one, Justice League...



How to make a Zack Synder film worse,? How to make me hate a Joss Whedon film (good thing consider the revelation about him this year)? I know... combine them. Snyder had to step down from Justice League due to a family emergency and Whedon took over so tone wise the result is a complete disaster. It has all heavy handed direction and sloppy fight choreography of Snyder and his attempts at darkness with oddly Whedon-isque jokes thrown in for good measure. Once again, Wonder Woman is the only decent thing here- sure there is potential in Ezra Miller's version of The Flash but I have no hope long term as I said that about Ben Affleck's Batman after Batman Vs Superman and please forget I ever said that. Cyborg, boring; Batman, boring; Aquaman, pretty but boring and not even making use of his talking to fish powers; Superman (yeah I don't care that this is a spoiler because it barely qualifies), insanely handsome but boring. Villain (Steppenwolf) boring, pointless, forgettable, and attempting the same form of destruction as every other DC film villain except the ones in Wonder Woman, Also the film could have been called "Everyone in DC sucks without Superman" as that is pretty much the theme of the film even though Wonder Woman could easier hold her own (in the one scene where she is leading and Aquaman gets his honesty on all he can say about her is "she's hot" which seriously dude, your superpower is talking to fish!!!) and Batman is not this useless normally (seriously DC film folk, I love Batman and you aren't making him work for me at all).

I could keep ranting but I'll save you more of my thoughts on DC films as you've heard them and this is the second year in a row that one of them has been one of my worst films- granted Suicide Squad stood on its own for the title and Justice League shares it, and what do I know as it is now Academy Award winning Suicide Squad (I'm not sure what the Oscar committee was on when it handed out that one).

To finish the perfect meme that a friend tagged me in the other day as a self aware palate cleanser...




Thursday, October 26, 2017

Is that sufficient to excuse?

A bit of a serious post tonight after my recent entertainment related ones.

If you want entertainment recommendations, can I suggest Thor: Ragnarok or all twelve seasons of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia? I saw the former today and have recently finished on the latter (in my defence the episodes are less than half an hour, it is very addictive, and I started weeks ago), and the former is super crazy fun times and the latter is literally one of the funniest shows I've seen in years (if very on the dark side which is how I like them). So if that is what you came for you can now look away.

This post is instead mainly about the spiralling circus of Hollywood sexual assault allegations, and the #metoo campaign.

Unless you have been living in a cave, you will have seen in recent weeks that numerous women have come forward with allegations of sexual assault against Harvey Weinstein, who for those not aware is one of the most powerful film producers working in Hollywood fordecades now. The volume of women who have come forward is shocking and what is more shocking is that, as is always the case with sexual assault, these women may be a tip of the iceberg. It has caused ripples that have impacted into US politics as Weinstein was a prominent contributor to the Democrats- the Republicans shamed them for this but considering the fact that the current Republican president has a significant backlog of sexual assault allegations which were often settled out of court for large settlements, and that they took funding from several prominent contributors who have recently also been the subject to cases like Weinstein's, I feel it is a case of people in glass houses... 

The question I want to start with here is the appropriate reaction to case like this when it comes to paying money at the box office. There have been several prominent cases of men in Hollywood being accused as Weinstein has been, there have also been cases of domestic abuse, and tacit approval or turning a blind eye on these matters. The first reaction is to boycott but then people ask the question once again of separating the art from the artist- even easier in the case of the producer as they are the money man not the artist per se. 

This is where I have to be honest about my own inconsistency in this area. As you may or may not be aware, one of the best known cases of abuse or assault of a woman, or female child, by a Hollywood player is that of Roman Polanski. Polanski has lived in European countries without extradition to the States for decades now to avoid trail for the rape and drugging of a 13 year girl in the late 1970s, and it was not only about six years ago that he offered what was quite a feeble apology to the girl who is now 53. Polanski is also a much awarded and quite talented film director. His career significantly slowed after he fled the States- his first film was released in 1955 and about half of his output is between then and 1977 when the rape occurred, with the other half coming in the forty years since the rape- but his last Oscar, for The Pianist, was in 2002 only 15 years ago and he is still actively making films in France. Now here is my honesty on this director, the rape was committed before I was born so any exposure I had to him as a director was with that knowledge. My first Polanski film was, like most people's, his 1971 version of Macbeth at high school and as far as I know it remains one of the most used cinematic treatments of Shakespeare in schools. Now I had no choice in that one but I saw it several times both in class and then at home whilst I studied Macbeth. I remember people telling me the fate of the lead actress (I'll come back to that) but no-one told me about the rape case maybe because at the time I was only a year or so older than his victim. Even after I knew the whole story, I paid money to see The Pianist at the cinema and I purchased and still own the DVD of Rosemary's Baby (his very terrifying 1968 horror film). Polanski's skill as a director has lead him to be one of the most frequently mentioned cases of people attempting to seperate art from artist and crimes of artist. In addition to this Polanski's personal history has lead him to be seen as someone scarred by his past in an incurable way. Polanski grew up in the Jewish ghetto in Krakow in Poland at the beginning of the Second World War- if you read or watch, Schindler's Ark/List, the young girl in the red dress that Oskar Schindler sees is Polanski's cousin (her memoir The Girl in the Red Dress (if memory serves, I read it over a decade ago) is well worth the read). He managed to flee the ghetto and lived in hiding for the last part of the war but his mother died in the Holocaust. He then lived for a time in Soviet occupied Poland then moved to France, England, and ultimately Hollywood. In England he met Sharon Tate, an up and coming American actress, and they married- she was in a few of his films including playing Lady Macbeth. Then in 1969, Tate was murdered by followers of Charles Manson along with friends at the house she and Polanski were renting in Hollywood. At the time of her death, Tate was pregnant and almost full term with what would have been the couple’s first child- the unborn child died in the attack on its mother.  Now that personal history is overwhelmingly horrifying but does it excuse the rape and drugging of a 13 year old girl? Obviously it does not. For years, I have felt problematic about the few times I have given money for Polanski films in the knowledge of this, and I feel the guilt of the fact that crimes like this become easier to ignore (though they shouldn't never be ignored) when the person is skilled, the crime in the past, and the output of the criminal art of a genre that appeals to you.

The second guilt confession is an actor/director who I have actually boycotted, Mel Gibson. When I mention to people that I don't watch films that he has anything to do with, most people assume that it is because of the domestic abuse allegations from his last wife or one of the times he has shown himself to be profoundly sexist. The fact of the matter is though I boycotted Gibson because of his anti-Semitism, and his treatment of women was a secondary factor. It is as if I assumed that men in Hollywood were likely to have abuse allegations levelled against them, and then tacitly ignored this factor. When I realised that it was racism not sexism that had lead to my boycott of Gibson's work, I was troubled as to why not both.

The idea of the selecting the art in spite of the artist has come up for again in recent months and years with allegations levelled at creatives whose work I really enjoy or in the case of Weinstein, a man who funds the work of artists whose work I enjoy. First there were the allegations levelled by the ex wife of Johnny Depp which came out just over a year ago. I'm not a fan of Depp's recent work (the impact of his Captain Jack Sparrow character on every other character has become more than a bit much) but his earlier works especially with Tim Burton are some of my favourite films. When I saw Depp in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (sorry that might be a spoiler but the film is a year old), I cringed simultaneously because I don't find his acting very undifferentiated nowadays and also because suddenly I was paying money for a film with a man who was currently under investigation for domestic abuse in it, and I knew that I would have to make the call on the sequels in part based on his presence. Second there was the shock of the piece published by the ex wife of Joss Whedon- she stated that Whedon had cheated her repeated and then gaslighted her about his infidelity. This one showed me why you should never have heroes because as those who know me at all know, I am a massive fan of Whedon's work. This left me and many others reeling because we are now in the position where one of the most feminist works of the late 20th/earliest 21st century, Buffy, was created by a man whose treatment of his ex-wife is under serious question. The impact of Whedon's work meant that in the week after this article was published, people did start having the separating the artist from the work conversation. Personally I don't know if I can watch Whedon's work in the same way now and I'm deeply saddened by that. 

Then finally we get to Weinstein. As I said Weinstein is a producer so is not the artist, however as one of the men behind Miramax and later The Weinstein Company, he is the producer who has nearly exclusively funded the works of some of my favourite directors. Quentin Tarantino and Kevin Smith, two of my all time favourite directors, have both had their works produced by Weinstein associated companies for decades. In the actor turned director space, you also have George Clooney and Ben Affleck working with Weinstein money on occasion. I single out these four because the represent (though not in order), the worrying responses, the good response, and the best response. The worrying responses were Tarantino and Affleck. Tarantino was one of the last of Weinstein's prominent collaborators to comment on the allegations and the delay wasn't the only issue. Tarantino clearly indicated that he had been aware of rumours about Weinstein for a while and in fact implied even that he knew that there was substance to them. Now he could have sought to help the women who were victims of this without bring things to light but it did sound like he had to a degree ignored the rumours. Affleck was in a similar boat to Tarantino- not that he was late but that has response was worrying. Affleck responded fairly early condemning Weinstein BUT Affleck's brother, Casey, was accused of sexual harassment a few years ago and Ben Affleck has never gone on the record about that. Now I won't be boycotting the works of Ben Affleck (though I have considered boycotting his brother's work for a while) or Quentin Tarantino for their replies being worryingly lacking but just to highlight I would have preferred if they had either condemned Weinstein early and directly with no room for question as Clooney did, or gone the extra step and declared that future profits from their Weinstein produced works would be in part donated to charities that assist victims of rape and assault as Kevin Smith did (his response was exactly what you would want and makes me want to pay additional copies of his films as I already own the ones I would want to own so my money did go to Weinstein). It is harder to boycott a studio but there needs to be a question whether in Weinstein's case we should.

That is a little all over the place but it was essentially just to raise the question of whether we can or should ever look to the art and not also see the artist (or in Weinstein's case the money) behind it.

Now I've written quite a lot and I haven't spoken about in length or even named the women who were victims of these attacks or this treatment. I want to be VERY clear that this is not to highlight the men who did these things over the women who were victim to them. It is to say that as we need to know these women are more than the victims we make them. Their names are important but because of the things that they did in their lives that make their lives meaningful not the incident/s in their life that made their life horrible. These men may have made them feel less than human so I feel it is not my place to repeatedly associate them with that dehumanising act/s.

This brings me to the victim side of things and the newest internet awareness campaign. Alyssa Milano who is one of the women who has accused Weinstein called last week for women to share on social media their own stories of sexual assault or harassment with the hashtag MeToo. 

What I found interesting about the response to the hashtag was not the volume of it, most women I knew (myself included) were of the opinion that sadly we live in a world where rare (if non existent) was the woman who could not use the hashtag, but more the shock that some men felt when they saw the volume and the slight push back (mainly around assault of men by women- no-one said it doesn't happen and it is horrible too but even in cases of male sexual violence or harassment, the perpetrators are usually male, cases of female on male sexual assault make up less than 10% of assault cases). I have said in the past that internet based awareness campaigns can be ineffective but this one might be the most effective thus far. I applauded the men who responded well on social media- owning times when their own actions might have been less than ideal and supporting the women there knew- but this isn't the big impact and I wanted to talk about that and about the women who didn't share the hashtag.

Being honest about assault or harassment isn't easy, and the way Western culture works means that women can feel shamed even when the harassment is not directed at them. For example, a woman sees another woman get cat called and then the same group of men do not cat call her when she walks past them and society encodes in the second woman the desire to question her attractiveness and to compare herself to the first woman instead of standing in solidarity with the first woman and declaring the actions of the men as demeaning and awful. Society says that women should not stand together but should be put at loggerheads over who is the more desirable. For thousands of women to come out on social media and declare in solidarity, that they all experienced similar acts is powerful. It helps break the stigma of victimhood. Sexual assault and harrassment can lead to massive psychological and emotional scars and women around the world were able to communally have a moment to work through those scars in a medium where rape threats are more common than female solidarity. I therefore want to say to those who like me shared the hashtag that I support you in coming to terms in whatever happened to you. To those who ask why not all women did say the hashtag I will offer some possible reasons:

1. They were not psychologically ready to do so. This does not make these women less brave (the word used for women who did share) or less strong. Some women may spend most of their lives fighting to process what happened to them and reaching a point where they can do so in private much less in public. It is one of the most horrible parts of sexual assault and harassment, that it can forever scar its victims.
2. Society tells them that it won't listen. Many women fear that they will not be believed and this is not uncommon, and not being believed can also be psychological scarring. Others think that they will be slut shamed or that the assault or harassment was in some way their fault. Finally if the assault was an incident where consent had been given at another time but not that time or where the woman felt that she was not able to say "no" as clear as she would want to, there is the potential for guilt on the part of the victim. 
3. They don't think what happened to them is significant enough to share. This one I heard from people online who were cautious about not sharing a hashtag of their own. It is one where maybe more people in this boat should have shared. We are told by society that assault and harassment need to be "serious" to be worth mentioning.

Trust me on this internet land, many of women you know who didn't share likely fell into these categories or fell into the "I shared on another occasion" boat- women has shared similar hashtags though not as broadly in the past, for example when the Trump Access Hollywood tape was reported on. 

I do want to say that the significance argument is so common that I feel the need to say that harassment and assault can take many forms that don't get reported to the people from the person who grabbed you arse in a crowded space but you never see who it was, to men who have conversations with your chest instead of your face, to cat calling, to internet based attacks based on gender, to any act or conversation that crosses a line and makes you uncomfortable or scared for your safety. I would suggest that we could or should take it further than strict harassment or assault to cases where women are made to feel their only worth is their looks and who are questioned when they do not function to the norms that society sets for women as pretty faces. That said if we took it that far the avalanche of comments on that hashtag might break the internet.

I was going to share one of my MeToo stories, but I've written enough on this so I will say that I've been able to say MeToo since I was very young and not by my broader definition. I would suggest that beyond every woman being able to say it, it is significant number that can say it of their high school years and even earlier (I'm thankfully not in that second basket so far as my memory serves).

These hashtags may not have smashed the patriarchy in the past but the volume of response to this one has received a response for men in support that makes me a little more hopeful if not much. 

I wanted to say beyond comments on assault and harassment. It might be worth always checking your privilege when you comment on anything that isn't your personal experience online. This means that for all my experience as a straight white cis gendered middle class woman I need to be always be mindful of the fact that only in my being female am I not privileged and I know that the internet I speak into also largely speaks with that privilege unless they also have the added privilege of being male. I have found that when you share something that could be controversial or presents a view that undermines or questions privilege, the bulk of those who engage in debate are white men whilst women are more likely to use the Facebook reacts but stir clear of comment. Maybe it is just the folks I know and not to say anything bad about white dude engaging in discussion (go right ahead as long as you are meaningful engaging and not just stopping after a few terse words- this is the internet so don't forget your lack of tone), but I have to say I was deeply impressed when a young guy I know the other day started a comment on such a post (an opinion piece- by a white dude in fact- about linkages between violence by men broadly and mass shootings that I had shared as a think piece) by acknowledging his discomfort with the fact that only white dudes were commenting and he was therefore not sure how he felt about adding to that (his comment was really good as a whole and ultimately prompted the only female comment on the post that wasn't me). Checking privilege welcomes engagement and in the world where people are trying to tell personal stories as the MeToo hashtag has encouraged, we need to support and encourage others in our online engagements and not shutting people down with privilege.

Just to end my post on a lighter note. Did you know that snow peas are also called mangetout? I discovered this earlier this evening and knowing I was sitting down to write male violence and harassment towards women, it made me laugh. My new joke, "what is the most feminist vegetable?" "Mangetout". Supposedly it is pronounced mange-tout but still could easily be man-get-out. 

Friday, October 20, 2017

Let's talk about crime

In my last post, I mentioned that I had just started on Mindhunter, the new Netflix series on the formation of the FBI's behavioural science unit, and that I might give supply a brief spiel on my opinions on that when I was done. I actually finished it the next day (yes ten episodes in two days, I am on holidays folks) and I figured I'd type up something on it combined with a movie I just saw, The Snowman. Mainly because one is amazing and one is, how to put this mildly, not.

As a caveat for those not fans of crime based entertainment, both of these fall into that basket but that is pretty much where the similarities end except with a small issue I have with one that is a massive issue in the other.

So first to Mindhunter (though I did see The Snowman a few days earlier) for which unfortunately the trailer doesn't seem to be on youtube, you may have to search on your Netflix to watch it. Here is the poster for the show:

Image result for mindhunter poster

 Plot summary as the trailer isn't forthcoming. Based on the true crime work, Mind Hunter: Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit by John E Douglas (a former member of that unit) and Mark Olshaker, Mindhunter opens in the late 1970s introducing Holden Ford (Jonathan Groff) a young (he is revealed to be 29) but skilled FBI hostage negotiator. After a failed negotiation results in the death of the hostage taker, Ford is moved to working at Quantico training new recruits in negotiation skills. Ford finds the new job dull and inspired in part by a sociological grad student he meets in a bar (Debbie played by Hannah Gross), with his boss' approval, Ford starts taking some psychology and sociology courses to build his skill identifying criminals and starts to question the FBI's classifications of why crimes occur. As Ford teaches at Quantico, he walks past other lectures being given on Charles Mason and the Son of Sam, and he starts to think that the FBI's previous methods will not work on individuals like these. Ford's restlessness ultimately results in his being moved from teaching at Quantico to work with Bill Tench (Holt McCallany) on a road school that is designed to teach FBI skills to local law enforcement and as they travel they often help local police with difficult cases. In this road school capacity, Ford sees the opportunity to start to meet with and study the new form of killers that were everywhere in the late 1960 and 70s in America. He initially plans to try and meet Charles Mason but on the advice of local cops that Mason is difficult to visit in prison, Ford meets instead with Edmund Kemper aka the Co-Ed Killer. As the episodes unfold, Ford and soon also Tench meet with Kemper and other killers who they initially term sequence killers. In analysing the psychology of these killers, they ask for the assistance of psychologist, Dr Wendy Carr (Anna Torv) who is intrigued by the research potential of why these killers committed their crimes.

Now quite a few people have commented that this show is a little slow initially but I think that in part is being driven by people who are familiar with the cases it discusses. Though I also fall in the familiar with these cases basket, I didn't find it too slow and I think those not familiar with the cases need the build. The show does take a few episodes to build up to full steam but the wait is worth it. As I mentioned in my last post, the show was in part directed by David Fincher who is no stranger to the crime genre even in cases where the build is slow- I love Fincher's work and if I want a solid crime film, he would be one of the first directors I looked to- and he does very well with setting the mood in the opening episodes and then returning to close out the series. The directors I'm less familiar with do a great job of expanding the mood Fincher has set, especially Asif Kapadia who picks up from Fincher in episode three which is also when the pace of the show builds. The script is for the most part solid and when it does lag, the actors pull it across the line. Again as mentioned in my last post I've long been a fan of Jonathan Groff and I was really unsure of how he would travel here as he is usually in much lighter material (I mean the man has been nominated for two Tonys for performances in musicals after all, and he was in Frozen and Glee, and he has a puppy like adorable quality to him that often does not work in crime drama) and the weight of show does fall predominantly on his shoulders as though Tench and Carr get expanded as the series goes on, Ford is really the main character. My fears of Groff's ability to play into this darker side were quickly quashed as he shines as the social awkward yet highly passionate Ford, and nails the line between fascination with the minds of killers and going a little too far in his enthusiasm for this. McCallany and Torv I am less familiar with- I know I've seen him in things in the past but I cannot recall exactly what and I think the last time I saw Torv in something was a Bell Shakespeare production over a decade ago (no I've not seen Fringe). Both of them also acquit themselves really well- McCallany hitting the right beat on the cynical older detective without making him a cliche and Torv in mastering the juggle of portraying the kind of strong woman who TV audiences don't tend to warm to (though this needs to change) with making Carr someone you sympathise with. The character development of the three main characters instead just focusing on crime is outstandingly done. I also would single out Cameron Britton for his work. All of the actors playing the killers that Ford and Tench interview do really well especially as these are real people after all and some of them are now dead, but Britton is the only one in multiple episodes and his portrayal of Edmund Kemper is chillingly brilliant.  As an aside, being set in 1977 also means that the music throughout the series is amazing.

Something I found interesting about the show was that the characters of Ford, Tench, and Carr are fictionalised versions of the real people who worked in the early stages of the Behavioural Science unit at the FBI. Ford is based on John E Douglas who wrote the book on which the show is based and also has been the basis of many fictional detectives in the past, Tench is based on Robert K Ressler another FBI agent in the unit who worked with Douglas, and Carr is based on Dr Ann Wolbert Burgess who worked with Douglas on works he published on serial killers. The reason it is interesting is that none of the killers are altered nor are their crimes, and the show is largely careful to avoid anachronisms- you may notice I limited my use of the term "serial killer" though that is what Edmund Kemper and some others featured in the series were, and that is because the series doesn't use it until quite late as the term was not coined until the late 1970s rumour has it by Robert K Ressler (in the show it is coined late in the series by Tench to replace the clunkier sequence murderer or killer and as a means to differentiate killers like Edmund Kemper from killers like Richard Speck who was a spree killer). I'm not sure why they opted to go down this route with the main characters, likely to enable them to take liberties with the characters, but I felt it was worth commenting on. I was also entertained that they named the main character after not one but two cars.

Anyhow that was Mindhunter, it is really good but I do have to call it out on the one thing that stops it being up with Handmaid's Tale, Big Little Lies, and Dear White People as one of my top shows of 2017, and that is the character of Debbie. Hannah Gross does work hard with the material she is given but she is the only character who appears in all episodes who seems half thought out and were it not for Wendy Carr showing up about three episodes in, I would have questioned the treatment of women based on this character. Where Carr is a total boss who is clearly more intelligent and to a degree more respected than her male colleagues, Debbie whose sociological study could make her an interesting partner for Ford is pretty much a cipher. In the later episodes the show does try a little to address this by having her call Ford out on his constantly work talk but it is too late after over half a season of her acting as an exposition tool for the audience. Normally I would go harsher on use of women as ciphers but as I said, there is a another strong female character front and centre, the character in question is in most episodes a side line character at most, and though late in the day, the show does seem to notice the issue.

I think this might be a show to watch for years to come- based on an Easter egg for true crime nuts which the internet is all about spoiling at the minute (the spoiler is even on Wikipedia for goodness sake), I will put it as a footnote so you can stop before you get there if you don't want to know- so you should get on the band wagon soon*. I will include a warning that there are descriptions of very violent crimes (for example, it doesn't shy away from description of Kemper's crimes which were revolting to say the least) and photographs of some of these and some fictional crimes are re/created, so this isn't one for those who aren't otherwise fans of the crime/true crime genres. Personally I'm suddenly keen to read the book on which it is based.

So that is Mindhunter and as I said up top that one thing I was speaking about was good and one was not so, you can already guess where I might be headed with The Snowman.

Firstly the trailer as Youtube has this one...


Based on the best selling novel by Norwegian author, Jo Nesbø, The Snowman focuses on a series of disappearances of women in Oslo during the winter. The film opens not on the disappearances but on a single woman living alone with her son in a remote house. A man, apparently from his dress a police officer, appears at house and gives the boy a lesson in Norwegian history which is punctuated by him slapping the boy's mother whenever an incorrect answer is given. The boy flees from the house and builds a snowman. When he returns, he finds the police officer in bed with his mother and overhears her mentioning that the police officer is his father. Noticing the boy listening the police officer flees in his car and the boy and his mother follow him ending with the mother committing suicide by driving into a icy lake. Based on the clothing this is a flashback and the film then moves to Olso and the present day (or one assumes if the opening sequence was a flashback). Detective Harry Hole (Michael Fassbender) is an alcoholic who often passes out from drink in parks, though he does still hold his role with the police department and based on comments by other characters, he appears to have once been a highly respected and competent investigator. Outside of work, Hole seeks to help ex-girlfriend, Rakel (Charlotte Gainsbourg), with her teenage son despite the fact that she has a new partner and he is not the boy's father. One day at work, he encounters keen young detective Katrine Bratt (Rebecca Ferguson) who has recently transferred from Bergen and she tries to get him interested in the mysterious disappearances of women on snowy nights. Hole also receives mysterious letters in child like hand that are signed with a drawing a snowman. The film also flashes back to nine year earlier in Bergen (this flashback does merit text on the screen to explain it) when a similarly alcoholic detective, Gert Rafto (Val Kilmer), was investigating the disappearance of a wealthy woman and the suspicion was falling on industry magnate Arve Støp (J. K. Simmons) (who nine years later is comfortably holding a prominent position in Olso and helping with the campaign for a major sporting event in the city).

Now you are going to have to excuse me on this one because I'm almost certainly going to stick spoilers in here but as my recommendation is that you not see it, maybe you can pardon me just this once. If you have read my posts in the past, you know that my approach to crime fiction is be unpredictable or be well written or I'll have none of you. Rare is the work of crime fiction where I don't pick the killer (For example, I picked the first season of Broadchurch a few episodes in which many take as the yardstick for unpredictable) so the writing needs to be amazing to keep me interested. This one I picked early on and the writing did not help at all nor did anything else especially as I have not read the book. I know The Snowman isn't the first book in the series that feature Harry Hole which seems an odd choice as it seems to rely on past exploits that aren't portrayed to make me want to side with the character at all.

First to get the silliness out of the way, does Harry Hole sound different  with a Norwegian accent because with an English/American/Australian one it sounds like a poor conceived far too crass drag name. I can just imagine her fellow drag queens talking Harry Hole aside and explaining that puns made funny names but this was a little on the nose.

Anyhow inappropriate jokes aside, back to the film. If the summary above sounds choppy that is because the film is. I know that the film had a switch of directors and didn't film all of its scenes but even so I would have thought that the editing could have been cleaner. The film jumps without transition between the present day to the random nine year earlier scenes in Bergen, the link to which takes a LONG time to pay off (I suspected correctly what the link was aside from the disappearance of women but due to the editing I did struggle initially). They could have clearly indicated that the initial scenes were in the past. As I said the clothes suggested that but you couldn't be certain and so might have really struggled to determine this and to see it as the too obvious signposting that it was if you knew it was the past.

The cast is full of actors I normally love. I would normally watch Michael Fassbender in anything, and I have plenty of time for Charlotte Gainsbourg, Toby Jones (who plays the senior detective in the Bergen flashbacks), Chloe Sevigny (she plays a victim and the victim's twin sister), and James D'Arcy (he plays another victim's husband), and that is before you get to J. K. Simmons who I think is amazing in most anything even if he does still carry terrifying associations from his character in Oz (over a decade has passed but he still scares me a little even when he is in comedies). This said there are so many issues with the acting that it makes me deeply worried for this cast. Firstly one of my pet peeves is mixed accents. If you don't know what I mean by this, I mean when a film is set in specific place and every character is from that place but every one has a different accent. Simmons seems to attempt a Norwegian accent and a few of the supporting actors, in particular Jonas Karlson who plays Mathias (the new partner of Hole's ex-girlfriend), are Swedish (not that this is Norwegian but it is closer than the others) but everyone else is all over the shop- posher English accents from Fassbender (who at least doesn't use his actual Irish accent and add another one to the mix), Ferguson, and D'Arcy, slightly less posh English from Jones, slightly French from Gainsbourg, American from Sevigny, and mumbled American with a side of what the hell from Kilmer. The bulk of the performance seem lacking direction and almost bored- this is particularly the case with Fassbender, Ferguson, and Gainsbourg. The chemistry between Fassbender and Gainsbourg is non existent and their one love scene very mechanical. Jones, Sevigny, and D'Arcy are highly unused only appearing a small number of scenes, particular Sevigny considering she is not European or English, and is a big enough name to normally warrant more screen time. Simmons seems to try the hardest of the cast but even he appears bored in some of his scenes. Kilmer is alone in not ringing in it, that said I have no idea what he was doing as his performance is one of the strangest I've seen in many years as if he figured that as he was playing drunk the whole time, he could do whatever he wanted.

The script appears dumbed down to make sure a small child could understand it (the film is at times a bit bloody, please don't take your five year old). Fassbender and Ferguson as the leads have to deliver some terrible clunkers, and the every scene where Fassbender or Kilmer is drunk seems underwritten as if "act drunk" was just scribbled on the page and nothing else. The main dumbing down occurs around medical terminology with D'Arcy's character needing to spell out what he meant by sterile for some reason and Karlson's character being described as a plastic surgeon initially (sure that is fine) but then later been shown to be doing work with hormones (which is a plot hole and a half on its own because that career transition between specialities would take years and a lot of training not be a sudden whim as it appears here) which is kept super vague. Everyone has watched medical shows nowadays, you can be specific, and if they don't get it there is always google after they get home from the film. There are things set up as prominent set pieces, for example the new police recording system, that never pay off. There was also issues with the plot as a whole. Drunken slightly older male detective (granted Fassbender is not that old) with many past glories and a failed relationship who still loves his ex paired with young bright eyed, often female, keen bean new recruit...I think I've seen that before, only about a thousand or so times. Killer targeting women who have had affairs as vengeance on a single mother who he feels abandoned him...also a very familiar trope. Everyone has missing parents on the backdrop of the killer's motive is also something that has become familiar in recent years. Some originality of plot would have been nice even if it was just to strengthen the script.

Finally the place where I said this was similar to Mindhunter but worse. The worst treatment in this film is reserved for its female main characters. Gainsbourg comes off the easiest of the two as it appears that they have just written her as generic love interest with a few complications and she basically has to go between that and sudden screaming at the end of the film when she is targeted by the killer (yes I did warned there would be spoilers).  She is one of the film's most underwritten characters but better that than the fate reserved for, only slightly less underwritten, character played by Rebecca Ferguson. Much like the character of Debbie in Mindhunter, we have another cipher on our hands and this time no-one seems to notice or care! Ferguson's character is described in synopses of the film online as a "brilliant new recruit" but all she does in the bulk of her scenes is parrot Fassbender's character or wait for him to do the bulk of the investigating. On the few occasions where Ferguson's character takes initiative, what would have been seen as foolish but brilliant from a male character is seen as deeply stupid. Ultimately (spoilers) her taking initiative results in her death or serious injury- near the end of the film, she loses a hand and is left in a freezing car in the snow BUT as we obviously don't care what happens to the women, the film opts for a massive plot hole around whether she is alive or dead. For a film about violence towards women, it does a great job of making sure to also undermine them with the plot, script, and character development.

Anyhow not sure The Snowman will be the worst film I see in 2017 but it will be up there. I did check the plot of the book online and it seems that clearly a lot of the plot was cut but that said unfortunately I don't know that the remaining plot would have added much.

Also stop now to avoid Mindhunter spoiler...










*Mindhunter spoiler... The mysterious character who appears at the beginning of nearly every episode and was identified by the show as AT&T employee is almost certainly Dennis Rader or the BTK Killer. In addition the case the police discuss with Ford and Tench in the first episode which isn't solved closely resembles a BTK victim. John E Douglas worked on the BTK case and wrote about it. The reason this indicates that the show might be around for a while is that the BTK Killer was active for a LONG time and was only caught in 2005 so nearly 30 years after 1977 when the show is set. I doubt that means close to 30 seasons but I would anticipate that whenever the final season occurs, it will feature that investigation and likely a time jump and aging makeup for Groff.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Life after death in sitcom land and new true crime in podcast land

Hi again folks, still from Scotland. Whilst I've been away I've been able to catch up on old pop culture things or start on new popular culture things, and I have two big recommendations (granted I started writing this a week ago and I think everyone got the memo on the second recommendation in the interim). Following this I have a few words on something else that just started a new season which I have been a semi-reluctant fan of for a while to tie in with the fact that last week was World Mental Health Week.

TV show wise, thank goodness for Netflix and its automatic transfer to the country you are in (please take note spotify (I'm very disconnected from music right now) and Amazon Prime (to get the third season of Outlander on UK Amazon I had to try everything I had and much mucking around to sort it out as I was previously a Prime subscriber back home, and this was despite having a UK Amazon account for many years- before I had US and Australian ones in fact)). I'm not sure what UK prime time looks like nowadays (I have a TV at my AirBnB but I've not turned it on as yet) but my previous experience has been wall to wall soap operas and reality TV. I'm sure that isn't all that exists as I watch a lot of good British made TV and also this was coloured by my staying in hostels previously and therefore not having control of the TV. Maybe it is because this that I will be recommending a US made show which is on Netflix.

The show I have been watching recently dropped on UK and Australian Netflix. The show was on other channels earlier as the first season was aired in 2016 originally and Netflix just got the rights and dropped the first season in one hit along with debuting the first episode of the second season in September. The show is the newest sitcom from Parks and Recreation and Brooklyn Nine-nine creator Michael Schur, The Good Place. Check out the first season trailer...


That gives you the plot to a degree but just in case you didn't watch or the link messes up, the summary is as follows. Eleanor Shellstrop (Kristen Bell) finds herself in a office setting where she is greeted by Michael (Ted Danson) who advises her that she has died and is now in the afterlife. Michael tells Eleanor that due to the good works she did whilst alive, she has been placed in "the good place" for her afterlife. As she is welcomed, Michael walks her through the neighbourhood of the good place in which she is to live, and to her very small and insanely quirky (for want of a better word) cottage in the neighbourhood. He puts on a video of the work she did in Africa for human rights and talks about her work as a death row lawyer, and introduces her to Chidi Anagonye (William Jackson Harper) a Senegalese professor of ethics and moral philosophy who is supposed to Eleanor's soul mate (in the good place everyone has a soul mate). After Michael leaves them, Eleanor reveals to Chidi that the video of her life is not her life and that she was not a lawyer or that good a person at all. Eleanor is sure she is not supposed to be in the good place and asks Chidi to help her with this. In the course of the first episode, you are also introduced to Tahani Al-Jamil (Jameela Jamil)- a wealthy British philanthropist of Pakstini descent, Tahani's soulmate Jianyu Li (Manny Jacinto)- Taiwanese Buddhist monk who has taken a vow of silence, and Janet (D'Arcy Carden)- the information system and assistant for those in the good place that takes human form.

I would strongly recommend not investigating the show at all online due to spoilers. Just start on it. I'm a big fan of Michael Schur's shows (the ones he created- he also wrote for the US version of The Office which I'm not a fan of due to my love of the original UK version but I know many folks are fans), and I love to see here like Brooklyn Nine-nine a diverse cast, and like both Brooklyn Nine-nine and Parks and Rec very cynical humour of the kind you don't often get in US sitcoms and some solid roles for women. I am also a long term fan of Kristen Bell and Ted Danson, and the presence of either on their own without Schur in the creator's chair would likely have resulted in my watching the show. Bell takes the sass she honed many moons ago as Veronica Mars and adds to that an adult cynicism and still manages to make the potentially unlikable and selfish Eleanor into a very likeable character. Danson in the element he has perfected over decades is amazing, and the continual cheerfulness and odd naivete he gives to the character of Michael is delightful- yes naivete despite Michael being a hundreds of years old being. The actors I was not familiar with (Harper, Jamil, Jacinto, and Carden) are also really amazing- Harper in making the straight man to the chaos not boring, Jamil in nailing the pretentiousness of Tahani, Jacinto for spoiler reasons I won't go into, and Carden for making Janet definitely more than the robot that she keeps being called, I feel like Janet is the public servant of the afterlife. The guest cast is also good especially Adam Scott who should be in everything and is very different here from Ben in Parks and Rec. In addition for guest cast, there was much confusion of me trying to place Amy Okuda who plays a background character late in the season (only super nerds will potentially twig to this and they will likely just recognise her but it took me a while to realise she was Tinkerballa from The Guild). The premise is also quite novel which adds to the quality of the show. The whole idea of someone who is in the good version of the afterlife trying to qualify for her position there is something I've definitely not seen before. The writing is hilarious and along with Schur one of the main writers is Drew Goddard who worked on Buffy among other things. The mechanics of the afterlife in the show will likely lead to many comments by folks of various religions who watch the show especially in terms of a merit based afterlife and what that suggests for the moral philosophy that Hollywood proposes. This show is definitely a new favourite for me, and makes me think of the words "fork", "shirt", and "bench" very differently.

Onto podcast land... I am a late comer to the whole podcast vibe only joining in just over a year ago, and cliche dictates there is no-one more zealous than a convert, I feel I'm always talking people's ears off about some podcast or another. From initially cautiously investigating one podcast about a beloved TV show (The West Wing Weekly if you are curious), I now listen to over twenty different ones. I listen to a bunch on US politics (all by the same media company), a few fiction based story ones, a bunch of comedy ones on various themes, a few on cults (though all of them do have a habit of hitting my bugbear of adding an 's' to the biblical book of Revelation which drives me a tad nuts), and a bunch on true crime. There are ones that I never get behind on (the previously mentioned West Wing Weekly, My Favorite Murder, and Pod Save America in particular) and some that I'm still trying to binge to catch up on (I think I listened to about twenty old episodes of The Guilty Feminist, a new favourite, on a recent speed trip to London) and some I binge every few weeks to catch up on. Now there are some podcasts that seem to oddly have a universality of appeal which a few years ago would have been unheard of, except for everyone's old back up This American Life. Then came Serial and I remember being at my job at the time and half the people I worked with were listening to it constantly, and then I'd catch up with friends and many of them were listening to it, suddenly podcasts were the norm and everyone seemed to be in on it (just to confirm, I have listened to the first season of Serial now- people told me not to bother with the second). Also fascinating was that Serial was true crime which many people don't warm to but here were people I knew would not normally be interesting in true crime listening along and talking about it with fascination. Suddenly podcasts were a thing everyone was into (except me for some reason) and then as everyone picked their particular poison and the Serial excitement died down, it seemed there weren't podcasts for everyone, there were just podcasts for certain groups. But then the suddenly another one emerged in S Town- I was on the podcast train when it came out and binged it in two days and ended up emotionally drained for about a week afterwards. I think S Town was helped by its connections to Serial and This American Life but it was very different from either of these so if it was just their drawing power I would have expected numbers to dip and people not to finish it, but I remember the weeks after when people I knew would walk up to me with a knowing look in their eyes and a look of emotional exhaustion and I knew S Town had claimed another victim. So that is the lead in to say my new recommendation appears in the last week (literally since I started typing this post last Tuesday and now (Monday night of the next week)) to have become the next one of these universal buzz podcasts.

That recommendation is Dirty John.

Image result for dirty john podcast

It starts with the description of a coroner's examination of a body and then shifts to the story of a woman called Debra who meets a man, John, through a dating site, and he seems to be exactly what she is looking for. Debra has been married four times previously and has three adult daughters from those marriages (Terra, Jacqueline and the middle daughter whose name is only mentioned a few times and therefore I cannot recall). Debra is a successful and wealthy interior designer living in Orange County California who the podcast mentions uses her business to help single mothers by seeking to hire them and train them. John tells her he is also divorced and has kids from that previous marriage and that he is a doctor who has recently been working for Doctors Without Borders in Iraq. John seems odd but after a failed first date, they give it a second try and the relationship speeds ahead at an insane rate and soon enough John meets Debra's daughters. Jacqueline, who is the eldest and lives and works with Debra, meets him first and takes an instant dislike to him and tells her mother that sometime is off about this man. Terra, the youngest, is more trusting of new people than her big sister gives him a chance but then she starts to be wary when a few odd events occur and John is very unpleasant to her boyfriend, and she ends up terrified of him. With all of her daughters (the one whose name I can't remember as well- I'm really sorry to this woman but unlike both her sisters she was not a large part of the podcast nor was she interviewed for it) warning her against a man with whom she has had a very fast moving relationship, Debra has to pick between her family and John.

Now obviously that is just the beginning and I did leave a few spoilers even from the first episode out intentionally. I know everyone is binging this podcast now or has in the last week. I actually listened to it as the episodes were still dropping a few weeks ago- they were released one every few days over a week and a half- so to those who binged the whole thing, imagine having to wait even just a few days on episodes (so stressful). I found it via another podcast, Sword and Scale (BIG warning that one isn't for the faint hearted as it includes audio recordings from crimes including emergency calls and other things). That said the intensity of the podcast I got the recommendation from should not deter you listening to Dirty John- it is true crime but not the same kind of true crime as most of the others in that vein, and it definitely isn't one to give you nightmares. You get sucked in by the mystery of it all- whose body is the coroner describing at the beginning of the first episode? who stabbed the body (not a spoiler- that is in the first couple of seconds of the first episode)? who will Debra listen to, her daughters or her boyfriend? what is the deal with John as clearly something is not above board with him?  It is very fascinating and in my case it made me want to go back and watch a TV show I gave up on after a dud season several years ago (no mention as to which one as that would be a spoiler).

A few minor cautions before you start on it though. Firstly the narrator is clearly a great reporter but he does not have the best "voice for radio" so I found that annoying to begin with- bear with it and you should get past it. Secondly, not the podcast but the events may tend you to accidentally victim blame as you listen, be very careful with this and maybe try and empathise with the women as you listen even if what they are saying sounds off.

Anyhow Dirty John is on all the podcast places now and all the six episodes of it are up.

 Moving on to a few words on a show that has recently returned for a new season, its third. Now I love musicals and I love cynical, offbeat, and at times inappropriate humour and I love unlikable characters, so this show would seem to tick all the boxes for me, and I do really like it but it also makes me at times deeply uncomfortable and as it returned in the week the world turned a small corner of its eye to mental health, it is worth a comment.  That show is Crazy Ex Girlfriend. I know what you are thinking well it does have "crazy" in the title what did you expect but having "crazy" (which many with mental health issues consider a highly offensive term) in the title isn't a blank slate to say anything you want on mental health. The show is camp and hilarious and the cast is amazingly talented though I'm not sure I forgive it for writing out one of my two favourite characters in the second season. It is also full of strong female characters, is racially diverse, and its only strong and stable couple are two men. It gets so many things right, and if you want a sample of this, have some songs as it is a musical after all- I cannot find my favourite from season one which is about having large boobs on Youtube but here are some of my season 2 favourites. Firstly spoilers if you haven't seen the show and want to on this one- this one is about the relationship between my erstwhile favourite character and the lead character as he leaves the show...


Secondly this one is what the main character, who is Jewish, envisions every Jewish gathering is about. It shouldn't spoil anything for you:

Thirdly, probably my favourite from the second season and definitely zero spoilers here, this is the personification of a particular wind that is supposed to blow through town and make everyone act strange.


So you are seeing, it is good, right?- assuming you like musicals. All the songs are in different musical styles but all of them work, and the humour is dark and irreverent. It seems brilliant.

OK so let's go to the problematic context. The premise of the show is that a successful property lawyer from New York has a breakdown due to the stress of her workplace which triggers her existing tableau of mental health issues, and in the midst of this she runs into a man who was her boyfriend at a holiday school camp when they were teenagers, he is in the process of moving back his small Californian home town and she follows him. In song form, her moving is covered below (mainly because I haven't really featured the main character yet):



Now gradually the main character, Rebecca, finds friends, settles into her new job, and on a few occasions seems to be working things out. The problem is that she doesn't listen to the help she is given, she doesn't work things out, and the bulk of the surrounding characters only briefly call her out on these issues before essentially enabling her and that is if they notice at all that there is an issue- e.g the man she follows to California, Josh Chan, is literally one of the dumbest humans ever and it takes him almost all of the first season to notice that she has problems. Even though another character clearly identifies a mental health issue in themselves early in the second season and seeks help and moves in the right direction, no-one stops to think of this woman who is spiraling out of control as essentially the breakdown she has in the first episode continues without break over two seasons. This may all seem a bit too serious as it is a comedy show and it does clearly portray to the viewer that there is something wrong both in the way she interacts with the world and also in the therapy that she attends and ignores (depression has been suggested on the show as has borderline personality disorder and anxiety- I would lean to bipolar 1 or something similar with a side of other things were I to try and diagnose her but that hasn't been suggested yet). Also I understand the urge to deal with mental health with comedy in a positive non mocking tone (the show rarely directly mocks Rebeca's issues) but it just irks me a little that there is a show with a main character with a clear mental health issue who is so strongly in denial about this as the world seeks to fight mental health stigma. As I said I really like the show, but at times I just can't shake how deeply uncomfortable it makes me. Supposedly the diagnosis of Rebecca's condition is coming in season 3 and hopefully that moves the show out of the space that rattles me. Until then, my favourite season 2 moment from the one of my favourite characters who remains, speaks to where I sit with the show at times:
Image result for heather crazy ex girlfriend wine

Beyond that during the week after Mental Health week, I encourage people out there to be honest about their mental health and not to be afraid to see a doctor (and listen to one) when it is less than stellar. Also friends of folks with mental health concerns, love them well, listen to them well, and don't be afraid to be the person who at times has to say the hard words about seeking medical advice.

That is it from me for now. I'm off to watch this week's Outlander and then to continue on Mindhunter (new on Netflix, partly directed by David Fincher, featuring Jonathan Groff (such a big fan of his and no not from Frozen), so far good 70s tunes, and a fictionalised account of the formation of the FBI psychological profiling department that works on serial killers (the real people in this department coined the term "serial killer")...two episodes in and I'm loving it so a post on it might be forthcoming). Laters folks!

Monday, September 18, 2017

2017 Emmy's...the great divide

So hello again from Scotland...yes still in Scotland.

I want to chuck in a word about about the Emmy's. Basically it goes yay!

I haven't posted this year on this blog about TV picks and pretty much they can be summed up by the big winners at this year's Emmy's i.e. The Handmaid's Tale and Big Little Lies. If you run down the Emmy ballot for the awards presented on Emmy night, I picked the best overall in all categories (also being a big Veep and John Oliver fan) except the reality TV (sadly my pick didn't win) and TV movie ones (I must get around to Black Mirror at some stage), picked all the acting categories except Male acting in dramas (I was on the money for miniseries (lead and supporting) and comedy (again lead and supporting), but I've not seen This is Us (my pick for the lead in a drama wasn't even nominated- the season as a whole was patchy but Sam Heughan's portrayal of a man coping with the aftermath of rape in the early section of season 2 of Outlander would have been my pick, actually he was solid the whole season, the plot was at fault not the acting)) nor The Crown), and could have made a solid guess at the writing and directing awards. Pretty much, if I had put money on it, I'd have raked in it- I even picked the female guest acting awards presented a week ago (if they had skipped over Melissa McCarthy and, especially, Alexis Bledel, I would not have been happy- it was amazing work by both these Gilmore Girls alums).

My brief yay aside. This year's Emmy's do raise questions... Let's start with the two shows I was delighted to see rake in the awards.

The Handmaid's Tale and Big Little Lies are adaptations of quite good (in some different and some similar ways) novels by female authors who aren't American- for those unaware, Margaret Atwood is Canadian and Liane Moriarty is Australian.  Both were strong female led productions, and not surprisingly in the female acting categories in which they competed with the exceptions of lead in a drama, there were two nominations from each show as compared to only one nomination for a man in either, Alexander Skarsgard was a deserved winner for Big Little Lies in my opinion too. Both shows also had women working behind the camera- writing, directing, and producing. This is before you get to the plot which I will split and try to keep spoiler free.

The Handmaid's Tale is about a bleak totalitarian future America. Fertility has plummeted and therefore some women in the society who are known to still be fertile has been forced to become handmaids by the government which practices a twisted version of fundamentalist Christianity (their belief system is based on a very small number of bible verses). The role of the handmaid is to bear the children for influential couples who are infertile, and once a month they participate in a ceremony where the husband of the couple essentially rapes the handmaid (though in both the book and the miniseries, the handmaids appear to be losing the concept of their body as their own and therefore have been deadened to the fact that the ceremony is thinly veiled rape). The lead character, Offred (handmaids are striped of their identity and known as "of" followed by the name of the man whose household they are assigned to) is a handmaid who has started to question the structure of the society. That is pretty much all in the first episode, though the ceremony takes longer to be revealed in the book so apologies for that spoiler if you read the book first. I would recommend reading the book first as the show does deviate from it- I found the changes fine (they expanded the training of the handmaids and the structure of their interrelation with each other in society, expanded a few characters, and moved the order of events a little) but a friend likened them to fan fiction based on the novel.

Big Little Lies is set in suburban beach-side California. The show opens with an event at an elementary school, at which someone dies. Before you find out who died or how or if it was murder (though it is implied that it is), events rewind by about six months to orientation for the children starting kindergarten. The viewer is then introduced to Madelaine who splits her time between helping at the local theatre and being a stay at home mother to Chloe and her teenaged daughter from her first marriage, Abi. On her way to the school, she meets Jane, a younger single mother who is new to the area and whose son, Ziggy, will be in Chloe's class- there is a hint of trauma in flashbacks about Jane from the first episode and this is gradually unpacked. The two mothers then meet with Celeste who is a friend of Madelaine's whose twin boys are also starting in the same class. At the orientation, Ziggy is accused of having tried to strangle Amabelle, the daughter of working mother, Renata. The events of the six months between this orientation day and the death at the school event then play out, with occasion interruptions by a chorus of gossiping parents giving testimonies to the police after the event. Again very surface level there and Nicole Kidman spoiled more than I did in her acceptance speech but suffice to say, violence against women committed by men is a big theme of the series and the book as is the idea of how a boy develops into a man who is violent and what acts of violence by children mean. I would recommend again reading the book first but not for the changes on the way to the screen (of course there are some but less than The Handmaid's Tale, beyond a major a location change), instead for the tone. The book is set on the Northern Beaches of Sydney and especially with the Greek chorus of minor characters popping up regularly, it is not just a drama but also at times quite a funny satire of primary school culture and playground politics in Australia (especially if you have any familiarity with that part of Sydney).

As you can see from these plot summaries, the things men do to women is a common theme as is the place of women in society. And based on these themes, you can maybe see why I say this raise questions. America currently has a president who voiced views on consent that are not just questionable but flat out nausea inducing, and whose ways of talking to or about women are terrifying at times (more often than not in fact- whether it is talking creepily about attractiveness of her eldest daughter or his continued attacks on Hilary Clinton). Whilst domestic violence statistics around the developed world are spiraling disgustingly upward at the minute, the US government hasn't announced any clear initiatives to address this- granted neither have many of the other developed nations so that is a black mark in all of their books at the minute. The US Department of Education is currently moving to make changes to Title IX which will make this avenue that currently allows some recourse to those who are victims of sexual assault on college campuses no longer able to be used to this end- again other developed nations also need to work on structures to eliminate sexual assault on college/universities campuses but the US is actively stepping backwards which is very worrying. Finally since coming into office, the Trump government has repeatedly attacked reproductive health services and moved to cut funding to these- doing this by saying Planned Parenthood and others simply exist to supply access to abortions, when this is simply not the case, they supply a range of sex education, and reproductive and sexual health services, and for poorer women, there is often no other option in terms of reproductive health care because of cost of health insurance in America (even post Obama care). These are just some of the examples I could cite but on the place of women in society, the divide between Hollywood and Washington DC in attitudes becomes overwhelming clear and you need to ask is it reconcilable and how does America as a world leader meaningfully move forward on this.

To add I hope these shows, which were both popular in Australia, also serve as a wake up clear on women's issues (oh for a better term) and in particular issues of violence and sexual assault back home, and also everywhere else.

That is my question with regards the two shows that owned the night. Just to add in conclusion on them to the performance by Elisabeth Moss (always a favourite of mine) as Offred, Ann Dowd as Aunt Lydia, and Alexis Bledel as Ofglen (especially Bledel though she was in limited episodes) in The Handmaid's Tale  were incredible and that is before you also turn to the amazing Samira Wiley as Moira who was beaten by Dowd in the supporting actor category- it was a powerhouse of amazing performances by amazing actors. The same goes for Nicole Kidman as Celeste and the outstanding Laura Dern as Renata in Big Little Lies, as well as Reese Whitherspoon as Madelaine and Shailene Woodley as Jane who Kidman and Dern respectively beat in their categories. Let's hope that this is the year that begins year after year of beautifully written, substantial roles for female actors out there to really develop and thrive in.

I do have questions raised by the shows that took out the male miniseries and comedy lead acting categories but unfortunately they are limited by my not seeing any or not seeing all of the shows in question so being unable to summarise them in a meaningful way so bear with me with for patchy descriptions.

To start with anyone else amused by the actors who took out both of these also being rappers who are about to/or just did appear in Star Wars film, or is that just me?

The Night Of for which Riz Ahmed won best actor in a miniseries or movie made for TV (the more I see him in the more I love his work (for example he was outstanding in Rogue One) and when he is not acting but rapping, he performed on my favourite song of 2016, "Immigrants We Get the Job Done" from the Hamilton mix-tape- also randomly discovered fact just now, he is almost exactly the same age as me how about that). I have seen the first episode, and own the DVD but unfortunately for me, I moved house not long after starting it and the DVD went into a box that went into my storage unit back in Sydney so I didn't get to see the rest of it. What I did see was really, really good, and I do very much want to see the rest of it. So plot summary so far as I can do one for The Night Of. A student of Pakstani descent borrows his father's cab one night to go to a party (he doesn't have other transport) and a young woman hops in thinking he is working (he is having issues turning the light off on the cab). He and the young woman get to talking. Soon enough the party is forgotten and he ends up back at her place where they drop some drugs and have sex. The next morning he wakes up in the girl's bed with limited memory of the night before, and then discovers that she has been stabbed repeatedly and is dead. He is quickly identified as having been at her flat and is arrested for her murder. He ends up with the lowest rent cheapest possible lawyer as his family cannot afford more for him.

Atlanta  for which Donald Glover won best actor in a comedy (loved him in Community and looking forward to him as a young Lando in the Han Solo film). Atlanta has been on my to watch list for AGES but I'm yet to see it. As a show, it follows a young black man who wants to be a rapper, and his daily life in Atlanta- sorry brief but even that I had to double check on Wikipedia having not seen the show.

What questions do these shows raise? Well common theme in both is race and the treatment of people of colour in America. The Night Of adds to this, the life of immigrants in America and the treatment of people of colour in the US prison system. In addition, though it didn't win in the acting categories, neck and neck with Atlanta (in my opinion) was the amazing (yes this one I've seen) Master of None which took out the writing in a comedy gong (I thought Donald Glover would win bast actor based on the buzz about Atlanta but I love Aziz Ansari so part of me wanted them to share the acting award), and it also speaks about the idea of race in the US and the place of the children of immigrants. As you can see all the more questions. The events at Charlottesville are still fresh in a lot of people's minds as is the Trump government essentially giving carte blanche (pun unintended) to the white supremacists and Neo Nazis. The US Justice system is currently looking at changing Obama era regulations about arrests on minor offenses that will certainly lead to increases in arrests and gaol time for people of colour. Trump's personal barely coded campaign rhetoric about areas with high populations of people of colour and his not at all coded, recent speech to police in New York that essentially endorsed violence against suspects were both horrifying. The recent proposed roll back of DACA (an act that protects those whose parents illegally immigrated when they were children in order to give these children paths to citizenship once they reach adulthood) and the continued discussion about border walls and what the Trump government sees as the negative impacts of immigration, only heighten the fear of current undocumented immigrants in the US, their families, and any future immigrants to that country. Once again these are just some of the examples I could cite but on race and immigration, again the divide between Hollywood and Washington DC in attitudes becomes overwhelming clear and you need to ask is it reconcilable and how does America as a world leader meaningfully move forward on this.

Unlike The Handmaid's Tale or Big Little Lies, I don't think either The Night Of or Atlanta had a huge audience in Australia (odd as Atlanta and The Handmaid's Tale are both on SBS, and Big Little Lies and The Night Of were both on Foxtel so they are on the same services). Master of None has a slightly larger audience. Needless to say, as on woman's issues, the question of race is just as big a question in Australia so I hope more people see these and I also hope the government starts to take action soon- especially as racism in Australia is so worryingly second nature to so many people that it could be argued that it is more ingrained than it is in the States. The same again is true and many other developed countries.

Finally the other comedy winners and the talk show winners at the Emmy's bring the questions to a head and slap you with them. Veep is about the most biting political satire out there- for those not familiar with it, it is about the first US female vice president and the characters are all deeply flawed and horrible, rife with egotism, amorality, and incompetence in varying mixes, but in the most hilariously delightful way. Listening to podcasts with input from those who have worked or work in government in the US (I need to start listening to Australian version of this as clearly I'm too deep in US politics at the minute but that is another issue), they say that Veep with its cutting satire is the closest of all political shows to the real Washington DC which is terrifying. Saturday Night Live's political views have in the past year become such a hot button with the US administration that Trump has openly attacked it especially in terms of its portrayal of him (Alec Baldwin was such a deserving winner) and it has been suggested that its portrayal of Sean Spicer (great work, Melissa McCarthy) played a tiny role in him losing the role of White House press secretary which is insane- you remember when Hilary Clinton was so polite about Kate McKinnon's brilliant portrayal of her that she appeared opposite her on the show, oh for the good ol' times of less than a year ago. In terms of variety and talk show awards with the exception of the winners in the variety special categories, notice the fact that John Oliver, Samantha Bee, Seth Meyers, and Stephen Colbert were nominated in most every category with Jimmy Fallon nowhere to be seen, and John Oliver winning most all of the categories. Those nominated represented the harshest late night critics of the Trump administration in my option it is a tight race between Oliver, Bee, and Meyers for who is the most critical- I watch all four of them but Oliver most regularly so maybe he wins in my books too. Hollywood appears to boldly declare its disagreement with the US administration in the winner of the comedy category, the winners of the best female actors in comedy (lead and supporting) and male actor (supporting) in comedy, and all the nominations and winners in the talk show and variety categories. In fact it goes further than disagreement, it laughs and mocks.

Now I have no issue with questioning those in power (it is at the root of democracy) and I do stand with Hollywood on these matters, but as someone looking in from the outside, it is a little worrying to see just how deep the political divide in the US has become (as indeed it also deepens around the developed world but currently the US is a big flashing warning light). As an outsider, I struggle to see a way forward so all I can do is hope and pray that the activists in the States won't give up the fight and that someone in power in the right offices finally listens, and that people can actually still seek to approach those they know from across the divide with some modicum of civility and seek to build bridges personally.

Anyhow enough on another country's politics from me...I really need to move back to focusing on Australian politics when I speak politics, not that I'm getting much of it in UK.

Just to say, make sure and watch the shows mentioned above as they are really worth it, or in the case of Atlanta, I hear they are.

As a better way to end this, have my best dressed from the Emmy's. The mad style of the male kids from Stranger Things won that hands down...

Image result for stranger things kids emmys 2017